SUBSCRIBE:
Error: Unable to create directory uploads/2018/07. Is its parent directory writable by the server?

AUDIO PROOF! UN Human Rights Council Special Rapporteur Richard Falk LIED About Not Being a “Truther”

by
Posted on March 21 2011 2:20 pm
Editor/Publisher The Lid Contributor to: American Thinker, Big Government,Big Hollywood, Big Journalism, Big Peace, Red State diarist, and proud to be one of the Blogs Lucianne Loves
Be Sociable, Share!
Print This Post Print This Post

In the twisted world of the United Nations, where fair is foul and foul is fair, Richard Falk is the perfect UN employee. As I pointed out when he was appointed to his position, as United Nations Special Rapporteur on Palestinian Human Rights (the official Israel basher) Falk is a believer of all kinds of conspiracy theories including “trutherism.”

After doubling down on his “trutherism” on his personal blog this past November, Falk was admonished by United States United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon for his public declarations that the full story of who was behind 9/11 is still unknown. Falk replied by saying that he wasn’t doubting the official version of 9/11,  he just wanted to fill some holes of unknown information, and that the criticism against him was just the work of “The Lobby” trying to silence him from talking about Palestine.  It appears that Falk’s denial is just another one of those Falk-ing lies.

Just before his controversial blog post, and the ensuing controversy, Falk appeared on the Kevin Barrett “Truther” radio show:

HOST: Well, hospitals are not the best places to be if you can possibly avoid them, that’s for sure. You’ve offered words of praise for his most recent book, on Cass Sunstein the Obama advisor who wrote that outrageous article urging the government to infiltrate the 9/11 truth movement, and disable the purveyors of conspiracy theories and so on, which would seem to be wildly unconstitutional. What’s your take on David’s book and why Cass Sunstein would be so extreme in his urging the government to drop the constitution and take down the 9/11 truth movement?

FALK: Well, of course very speculative, I think that Griffin’s book is a devastating critique of the Sunstein position. The Sunstein position seems to reflect either an implicit or explicit anxiety in the power elite that is running this country that they have to do everything they can to discredit those that are questioning the official version of what took place on 9/11. That they do this in part by pretending that by calling something a conspiracy theory, you’ve eliminated the need to investigate the factual reality of what took place. The liberal press has gone along with that to a frightening degree because they seem to feel that their reputation depends on not endorsing any kind conspiracy notion or anything that is labeled a conspiracy, unless of course it comes from a progressive source, in which case they jump to establish a conspiracy theory. [The liberal press] are very ready ever since the Cold War, to call any sympathy with progressive causes as the basis for criminal accountability. You see that in the pursuit of some Muslim religious figures, not only here, but in Western Europe and elsewhere.

Gee that doesn’t sound like someone who feels a need to “plug some holes” of information. It sounds more like someone who claims that there is a Government conspiracy to cover  up the truth.

Listen to the interview, and see more examples of Richard Falk’s full blown “trutherism” click below:

AUDIO PROOF! UN Human Rights Council Special Rapporteur Richard Falk LIED About Not Being a “Truther”

Be Sociable, Share!
One Response leave one →

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

Copyright 2018 NewsReal Blog

The Theme Foundry