SUBSCRIBE:
Error: Unable to create directory uploads/2019/02. Is its parent directory writable by the server?

Top 10 Islamapologists in the Obama Administration

by
Posted on March 15 2011 6:00 am
Lisa Graas has covered politics and religion at her blog LisaGraas.com since 2008. She has served as a crisis pregnancy counselor, youth speaker, mental health advocate and legislative consultant.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Be Sociable, Share!
Print This Post Print This Post

#4 James Clapper: Is Dhimmitude Taking its Toll on His Mind?

As White House Director of Intelligence, James Clapper oversees the federal Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act. It is Clapper’s job to know as much as he can possibly know about terrorism in the United States. Unfortunately, as of late, he’s made too many glaring errors to be considered competent for the job. His inability to answer even basic questions related to terrorism was noted by Senator Lindsey Graham who has called for his resignation. Clapper has said that Russia and China — not Iran and North Korea — represent the largest security threat to America.  He has also said that the Muslim Brotherhood is “largely secular“.

Imagine if you will that you were in this man’s position, being told everything there is to know about terrorism in America, and being surrounded by so many dhimmis, likely without even knowing for sure what a dhimmi is. Wouldn’t it take its toll on your mind? Rather than being the most foolish person in the Obama Administration, it could be that Clapper has been the most reasonable, and the shock to his reason has pushed him so far off his game that he’s now unable to coherently address the subject. Perhaps we need to send Clapper to therapy and keep him on so that the healing process of the Obama Adminstration’s denials may begin.

#3 Janet Napolitano: A Useful Idiot for the Caliphate?

Janet Napolitano, head of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in 2009 busied herself with targeting politically conservative citizens to monitor for “extremist” activity and the potential for “radicalization”, even wrongly tracking pro-life groups. In November of that same year, it was a radicalized Muslim, not a radicalized Bible teacher, who shook America to the core by murdering 13 American soldiers at Fort Hood, Texas. Nearly one month later, Janet Napolitano finally offered a statement that might be characterized as a threat alert, though she still would not use the word “terror” to describe it. Two months after that, Napolitano finally used the word “terror” and “violent Islamic extremism” in her reporting on the threat to America and the attack at Fort Hood. However, the Fort Hood soldiers have yet to receive Purple Hearts because the Obama Administration as a whole, including Janet Napolitano, does not recognize it as a combat incident in the War on Terror.

The Administration, you see, takes the same basic position as the Fort Hood attacker, Nidal Hassan, on what the “War on Terror” means.

In late 2008, while working towards a graduate degree at the military’s health sciences university, Hasan gave a Power Point presentation titled “Why the War on Terror is a War on Islam.”

Nidal Hasan, Janet Napolitano and others on the Left need to understand that no matter how much Christians, Jews and others disagree with Islam, we are in no way “at War with Islam”. It would be preposterous for America to go to war with Islam, or any other religion. The reason it would be preposterous is that America was founded on the Judeo-Christian view, not the Muslim Brotherhood view, of freedom and justice. As we can see from the attack at Fort Hood by Nidal Hasan, America is at war with “radical Islam”, not “Islam”, even though Janet Napolitano and others in the White House, including President Obama, will not face that reality.

Having said that, Jews, Christians, atheists, Wiccans, agnostics and pagans of various views all have the freedom in America to stand up and say “Islam is wrong” or “Islam is evil” or “Islam is a blight”, if that’s what they believe. Muslims, too, have every right to speak out openly about their beliefs in our national discourse, because in America we believe in freedom to disagree, freedom of religion, freedom of conscience, and freedom of speech. Unfortunately, the Left can’t seem to distinguish anymore between “speech” and “murder” on the scale of justice. It is precisely this confusion in the area of speech, violence and justice that those who oppose political, radical Islam cannot say so in a university without having security check-points. “Speech” that dissents from the Left is “War” to the Left. It is for this reason that Janet Napolitano has targeted conservatieve Americans as terror threats, while terror-supporting organizations in the Muslim community are given a pass and considered part of the solution.

Next: Hillary Clinton Embraces Those Who Seek to Destroy Freedom

Be Sociable, Share!

Continue reading page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

3 Responses leave one →

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

Copyright 2019 NewsReal Blog

The Theme Foundry