SUBSCRIBE:
Error: Unable to create directory uploads/2014/08. Is its parent directory writable by the server?

Inside the Mind of an Islamist: 5 Keys to the Psychology of an Honor Killer

by
Posted on February 8 2011 6:00 am
Phyllis Chesler is an Emerita Professor of Psychology and Women's Studies at City University of New York. For extended biography visit The Phyllis Chesler Organization.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • PDF
Print This Post Print This Post

Editor’s note: Muzzammil Syed Hassan was found guilty of second-degree murder by a jury yesterday. Read Phyllis Chesler’s post on the verdict here.

1. When Is The Aggressor Not The Aggressor? When He Has Been Forced to Defend Himself and His Lost Honor

On February 12, 2009, immediately after stabbing his unarmed wife 40 times with two large hunting knives and then brutally beheading her, he became calm, relieved. For the first time in years, he felt “peaceful.” Only then did he feel “safe from the Evil Dragon Terrorist” which is how he referred to Aasiya Zubair Hassan, the wife he had viciously battered for seven years.

Muzzammil Syed Hassan quietly told the police that he had killed his wife—but he immediately pleaded “not guilty” to second-degree murder. In fact, he told the police and the media what he is now telling the judge, prosecutors and jury in a Buffalo courtroom: that he, not she, was the “abused” and long-suffering spouse.

How is this possible? How can a man with a long and terrible history of physically and psychologically battering three wives and physically and psychologically abusing his children as well—he once punched his 13-year-old son in the nose—say this and believe it with his whole heart?

In pre-trial interviews, Hassan insisted that he suffered immense psychological abuse and humiliation during his seven year marriage to a woman who publicly nurtured a false image as a kinder and more sympathetic woman.

“All abuse happens behind closed doors, thus NO witnesses,” Hassan stated in his most recent letter. “All abuse is psychological, emotional wounds are not visible, thus NO evidence. . . . What a perfect crime! Only the poorly trained abusers use physical violence and get caught, for physical abuse leaves behind evidence.”

In the hour leading up to the murder, Hassan sent Aasiya text messages saying:

I am a good man, Aasiya…a humble and decent man, made some mistakes, please don’t punish me so hard. God likes forgiveness…I have not done anything to hurt you since Sunday…

Like other batterers, he is not merely saying that Aasiya “provoked” him to kill her but that she had been torturing him for seven years: cleverly leaving no marks, while he had been suffering the torments of the damned. Finally, afraid of being exposed—either as a batterer or as a battered spouse, both humiliating possibilities for a leader of the Muslim-American community—he said that he “snapped.” He could take no more. He had to kill her to restore his peace of mind.

And so, he took control.

Next: Where else have we heard such reasoning? —>

Continue reading page: 1 2 3 4 5

7 Responses leave one →
  1. February 8, 2011

    Why are people calling reputation killings, honor killings. The only person that can destroy your honor is you.

  2. February 8, 2011

    I have been reading lately about the similiarities between the Far Leftist/Progressive ideology and Islamists. References include those of the two groups having similiar dreams of bringing America to her knees and potential alliances, since, after all, the "enemy of my enemy is my friend."

    The similiarities are like a flashing billboard when you read these two excerpts from above about Hassan:
    "What this means is that he has been brought up to believe that he is entitled to whatever he needs, thinks he needs, or wants. Anyone who deprives him of what he needs or wants, is a dangerous “terrorist” enemy…."

    and
    "But his lack of remorse, concern only for his own image, his willingness to do anything, including murder, to punish those who have tarnished his image teaches us all something about the mind of an Islamist jihadist."

    Sounds like an American progressive and, especially, our President doesn't it?

  3. February 8, 2011

    One can only hope that his stay in prison will be both torturous and degrading. This would be a fit sentence for this animal.

  4. February 8, 2011

    It was either Noni Darwish or Ayaan Hirsi Ali who described radical Islamic family life as a cycle.

    Men take wives whom they abuse.
    Wives have sons whom they abuse.
    Sons take wives whom they abuse.

    And the cycle repeats.

  5. February 8, 2011

    What kind of justice could be served up to this person, I had to erase everything
    I just put down as it became cruel and unusual and to unbecoming. Yet after reading
    his side of the story I wonder just how brain damaged the rest of his race is and
    totally unfit to reside in our society, a society with so many problems yes but
    they are unfit to share air, light and freedom. Maybe now I understand just
    why the British were so cruel to these Pakastani people and other Muslims,
    maybe the British have been maligned and probably they heard and experienced
    to much of the other side of the story, a story that would make me do things that
    I would not be proud of. He should be put away forever…………………………….William

  6. February 9, 2011

    I'm so glad justice was served–especially because his claim of "self-defense" was the height of Islamic misogynistic arrogance.

  7. April 19, 2011

    bull$hit. conservatives obviously think like terrorists. they are the first to pick up weapons to get their way. they are the first to use religious justification for killing.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

Copyright 2014 NewsReal Blog

The Theme Foundry