Error: Unable to create directory uploads/2019/02. Is its parent directory writable by the server?

Hot Post:
  Washington Post and Salon Put Christianity in the Silencing Crosshairs

Posted on January 29 2011 11:00 pm
A life-long conservative Reagan Girl and conservative feminist, Lisa holds a Bachelors of Science in Political Science from Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, CT. Lisa is a staunch, unapologetic, Christian supporter and defender of Israel, who considers herself a spiritual Jew. Lisa resides in CT with her family and assortment of rescued pets.

Pages: 1 2

Be Sociable, Share!
Print This Post Print This Post

Pareene, who described Elliot as “So stupid and insulting,” is gnashing the left side of his face over remarks he considers intolerable: “Muslims are now more aggressive blasphemers against Christianity.” Pareene hit back, stating:

There are a lot of jaw-dropping assertions in this awful piece (‘Muslims don’t know how to behave when they are not in power,’ ‘Muslims are now more aggressive blasphemers against Christianity,’ etc.) but my favorite bit is this little story: Americans don’t have to go to Muslim lands to hear our religion blasphemed by Muslims.  In a Christian church in Portland, OR, I heard an imam (an immigrant from Yemen) say to the post-worship assemblage, ‘God has no son.’ (Not, ‘We Muslims believe that God has no son.’) When I [Dr. Elliot] yelled, ‘Blasphemy!’ the assemblage was shocked to silence and he was so unnerved that he initiated a handshake with me seven times before he left the church. What a really awesome minister this guy is, bravely screaming ‘blasphemy’ at a Muslim, then writing about it for the Washington Post. The Post probably rejected this piece because it was so stupid and insulting—which made it the perfect amount of stupid and insulting for conservative blogs…

Is Pareene living under a rock, or possibly hallucinating in a cave? It’s okay for Islam to defame Christ and murder Christians, but wrong for Elliot to defend Christ and speak out against Islamic violence?  Now who’s intolerant?

Ironically, neither the Post nor Salon recognized Elliot’s peace proposal: “Wouldn’t it help if Christians and Muslims stopped trying to convert each other?  This understandable question is ignorant of the fact that among the world’s religions, these two are the most essentially missionary: sharing one’s world-view, one’s way of seeing and living in the world, is optional to neither.”

Pareene  knowingly ignored Elliot’s call for religious peace, slamming his words as “spiked diatribe” in “listicle form, like Martin Luther,” making Christians out to be gentle “quiet and respectful” lambs, while claiming “Muslims are mean and violent.”

Islam practices violence on its own commanded terms without any help from Christianity’s existence.  Islam threatens aggressive retaliation against anyone speaking out against it, something leftist need to acknowledge–stop protecting genuine violence and seeking nonsensical bans on metaphors.

The truth is, leftists don’t want religious freedom, they want Christians silenced. Religious freedom allows Christians to spread peace when Islam is has come so far in its destruction of Christians and Jews.  And we don’t want that. Anyone daring to point out Islamic aggression must be silenced immediately.

Be Sociable, Share!

Continue reading page: 1 2

2 Responses leave one →

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

Copyright 2019 NewsReal Blog

The Theme Foundry