#1: Grand Prize: Barack Hussein Obama
Barak Hussein Obama, Islamo-fascist Apologist-in-Chief.
Of course, in this connection the word apologist has a double meaning. He walks the great stage of the world making self-demeaning gestures and speeches on America’s behalf. And at the same time he makes every possible effort to plead the case for the failed Mohammedan cultures, flatter their baseless conceits, and promote their imperialist causes. He has no right to either.
I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.
— Obama in Cairo, June 04, 2009
Indeed.
Most of us expect that our presidents will be the first to rush to our defense, the first to deny and refute hostile ideologies, the first to assert our uniqueness among nations and to uphold the clear superiority of our way of thinking and our way of life – indeed of our nation. We expect our presidents to uphold the good name of America, of the western civilization from which we spring, and of the free world that stands with us. We expect our presidents to favor our friends and allies, and to deal coolly with our competitors and enemies. We expect that our presidents, by way of protecting our own freedom, honor freedom wherever it exists and stand for individual freedom and individual rights wherever in the world people stuggle for them.
There are Americans who, for a variety of reasons, feel obliged to give lip service to the notion that Obama is in some complicated, roundabout, obscure fashion striving toward those objectives. But I very strongly doubt that, after watching Obama in office for nearly two years, there are many left who privately believe it, even among his supporters.
He is clearly not for us. But who, or what is he for?
… I spent several years in Indonesia and heard the call of the azaan at the break of dawn and the fall of dusk … I have known Islam on three continents …
Has he indeed? Then we would naturally expect him to actually know something about the subject. We might expect him to have some familiarity with the stagnant poverty, the brutality and oppression of Mohammedan society; familiarity with the stifling atmosphere of intellectual conformity and passivity, the censorship and fear of the morality police. Perhaps he has no interest in us Americans, but at a minimum we might expect him to show some decent concern for the people among whom he lived his childhood.
But he shows no more interest in the well being of say, the average dissident Iranian than any leftist shows for an illiterate child living on welfare in impoverished, decrepit Detroit, i.e. none.
I suspect (he’ll never say) that he doesn’t actually know much about Islam as an ideology or political system. I expect that most of what he knows consists of childhood recollections, of memorizing meaningless Arabic recitations from the Koran in a distant Indonesian madrassa. Perhaps all he remembers is the meaningless Arabic. (Did you know that Islamic education consists of memorizing the Koran, without learning old Arabic?)
With Muslim-outreach this, Alliance-of-Civilizations that, America-is-a-Muslim-country the other, we know that Obama inclines toward the Islamic. But is he more of a leftist, or more of a caliphatist?
My take is that Obama is primarily a leftist. I suspect he has concocted a unique personal blend of communism, third world revanchism, new-left gobbledygook and Mohammedanism in the private confines of his unknowable mind. And my guess is that he, much like the idiot communists of the Iranian revolution against the Shah, imagines that he can ride the Mohammedan tiger, without getting bitten. You will remember that the communists made common cause with the Mohammedan orthodox in Khomeini’s revolution — figuring that they were using the Mohammedans — only to be the first to get killed when the Shah fell. (On a side note, it is terrifically ironic that in supporting a nuclear Iran he is completing the work Carter began by destroying the Shah.)
I think, one of the tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court-focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change. — Obama on WBEZ Radio, Chicago
I’m betting that for Obama, the Mohammedan cultures are one of the elements of “the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change“, due to their extraordinary community organizing power — and I actually am not kidding when I use that phrase — their oil wealth, large population and their hostility and envy toward the western powers.
All that said, Obama (PBUH) is in an absolutely unique position as the president of the United States. His every gesture and words are scrutinized and magnified 10,000-fold. His slightest gesture is gigantic, being the gesture of a nation. His slightest word is pregnant with import. Thus his least concessions to the Islamo-facist cause have enormous significance, not only in America and the capitals of the Mohammedan nations, but also in Europe, Moscow, New Delhi and Beijing — not to mention the hill camps, hideouts and meeting halls of Al Qaeda, the Taliban, Hamas, Hezbolla, the Muslim Brotherhood, MILF, Jemaah Islamiyah, Hizb ut Tahrir and a host of others.
So what is he doing to advance the credibility of his bismillah buddies? Pretty much everything I can imagine, and then some.
Let’s begin with the most obvious thing which he is not saying … or doing anything about for that matter.
There are wars, hot shooting wars, low level skirmishing wars, back alley gang wars and creepy gotcha! assassin wars all over the globe, in which Mohammedans are the aggressors. Israel, Kashmir, Sudan, Nigeria, Thailand, Indonesia, France, Sweden, Chechnya, Lebanon and more. And do I need to mention downtown New York !?!? Yet nowhere in Obama’s (PBUH) words or actions can one detect even the faintest trace of accusation or resistance to aggression.
Nor is there the faintest hint that there might be anything in Mohammedan ideology itself, that might have anything to do with the fact that all of these wars are conducted by people who are solidly convinced, and loudly advertise the fact, that they are acting in strict accordance with the dictates of Islam — to wit, that Islam is the common denominator, and there just might be an issue there.
Now, coming from an ordinary dumb kaffir, someone who had never heard the poetic “call of the azaan at the break of dawn and the fall of dusk“, one might be more dismissive. And surely the Mohammedan observer might be more dismissive, and read less meaning into it. But coming from someone who claims to be initiated, indeed related, this is, in the flowery language of Joe Biden, a big effing deal. It’s a get-out-of-jail-free card. The Mohammedan supremacists must be thinking, “he knows and he’s letting us slide!”
Let’s consider Turkey for a moment. Turkey was one of his first stops and one of his first overseas speeches immediately after his election and well before Cairo. In Turkey he pronounced:
… The United States strongly supports Turkey’s bid to become a member of the European Union. …
… History is often tragic, but unresolved, … I know there’s strong views in this chamber about the terrible events of 1915. … the best way forward for the Turkish and Armenian people is a process that works through the past in a way that is honest, open and constructive …
… a just and lasting settlement that reunifies Cyprus into a bizonal and bicommunal federation …
… we share the goal of a lasting peace between Israel and its neighbors. Let me be clear: The United States strongly supports the goal of two states, Israel and Palestine …
… Both Israelis and Palestinians, both must live up to the commitments they have made. Both must overcome longstanding passions …
… The United States and Turkey can help the Palestinians and Israelis make this journey. Like the United States, Turkey has been a friend and partner in Israel’s quest for security. And like the United States, you seek a future of opportunity and statehood for the Palestinians. …
… I have made it clear to the people and leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran that the United States seeks engagement based on mutual interest and mutual respect. We want Iran to play its rightful role in the community of nations. Iran is a great civilization. …
… Iraq, Turkey, and the United States face a common threat from terrorism. That includes the al Qaeda terrorists who have sought to drive Iraqis apart and destroy their country. That includes the PKK …
… I know that the trust that binds the United States and Turkey has been strained, and I know that strain is shared in many places where the Muslim faith is practiced. So let me say this as clearly as I can: The United States is not, and will never be, at war with Islam. …
… I also want to be clear that America’s relationship with the Muslim community, the Muslim world, cannot, and will not, just be based upon opposition to terrorism. We seek broader engagement based on mutual interest and mutual respect. We will listen carefully, … We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over the centuries to shape the world …
Obama — Ankara, April 6, 2009
Let’s see:
- Unconditional membership in the EU — no meaningful hostility from Muslims toward European Christians that requires consideration.
- No blame for the Armenian genocide, its a “tragedy.“
- No blame about Cyprus. Just split the island and call it a draw.
- Why was he even talking about Israel? Oh, I forgot, the racism that refuses to speak its name. Mohammedans have a nutty thing about Jews. Have to give that a pass.
- Iran is a perfectly normal country. No real problem there.
- The PKK is the same brand of creature as al Qaeda. Just as bad. Same problem. Morally equivalent.
- The US will NEVER be at war with Islam. Um … never? No matter what? Are we quite sure about that? Even, um … if they’re at war with us?
- America’s relationship with the Muslim world will not be based upon opposition to terrorism — that’s not a fundamental requirement for friendship with us.
- “The Islamic faith, which has done so much over the centuries to shape the world” — blameless, blameless, goodie, goodie, kiss, kiss …
And which way has Turkey moved since Obama (PBUH) spoke these glowing golden words of blamelessness and moral equivalence? Well first, Turkey has proceeded cheerfully along the path to sharia takeover, and second, it has become involved in the assault on Israel … on the side of Hamas of course — which is something rather new for the Turks.
Now, he’s been speechifying on these subjects, and employing similar rhetoric around the world. Is it just me, or has there been, in general, globally speaking, no diminution of Muslim aggression? Could one say, in light of Iran’s incipient nuclear attack capacity, and a noticable spike in terrorist attacks on the American mainland, that Mohammedan aggression is on the rise?
As he announced in Turkey, he regards the regime in Tehran as a normal government with a legitimate claim to sovereignty.
I would be unforgivably remiss, if I did not mention Obama’s (PBUH) heartless refusal to lend the slightest moral support to the people of Iran when they last attempted to throw off the government of the mullahs.
His refusal was doubly evil. In addition to abandoning ordinary people struggling for freedom, or at least for some relief from gross tyranny, it was effectively the same as giving his explicit, specific endorsement to the mullahs and their regime. It was an announcement to the world that Islamic theocracy is AOK with the USA.
Of course this had a poliitical dimension, telling our enemies not to fear us and our friends not to trust us. But over and above that it had a moral dimension as well. It was to give moral sanction to evil.
A more blatant example of making the case for those that promote the goal of Islamic theocracy as a global ideal can hardly be imagined.
How about what he has been doing here at home?
It’s a tough call, but I would say that, among his domestic shenanigans, the single most important contribution that Obama (PBUH) has made to the jihad and jihaddist propaganda, is his banning of descriptive vocabulary in all government discussions of jihad or the resistance to the jihad. He wishes to remove all references to anything Islamic, from discussions of what our enemies understand, describe and successfully promote as definitively Islamic.
Now just to be done with that idea as briefly as possible, the governing elites of the world have decided that if they pretend, in front of Western news cameras and international gatherings, that the jihaddists have nothing to do with Islam, that potential jihad supporters and recruits will lose interest in the jihaddists and their cause. It’s entirely possible that politicos outside the Mohammedan cultures actually believe that. And the governing classes of the Mohammedan cultures have decided to at least act as though they believe it too — and who knows, maybe some of them might.
However, it is in the nature of the beast that the jihaddists, and their potential supporters and recruits do not believe in or respect the west, the western media, the western world view, the governing elites of the west, or the governing elites of their own nations. They do respect a LARGE and prestigious population of preachers who are absolutely dead, stoned to the bone convinced, that jihad is a duty incumbent on the believer — not an option, not a suggestion, not a good political choice, but a moral duty. And those preachers are not being clearly, definitively and convincingly refuted by the authorities at the main centers of Islamic study. Nor are they, in countries where free speech is unheard of, and an Un-Islamic word sends you straight to jail, being arrested.
The absolutely, puppies and sunshine, best thing that one can say about that idea is that it is completely disconnected wishful thinking. And the reality is quite dark. Many, if not most of the Mohammedan participants to this charade know it to be a lie. But as a consequence of their cultural background, they are accustomed to entertaining contradictory ideas, and are not troubled by the duplicity.
The effect of this maneuver is to deflect attention from reality, and thus scatter and diffuse, indeed defuse the energy and focus of resistance. A signal service on behalf of the forces of sharia.
We should not neglect to consider at least one other great contribution that Obama (PBUH) has made toward pleading the case for the Islamo-fascists. That is to lend the prestige of his office to a collection of supremacist organizations and individuals, at home and abroad, through his policy of engagement.
We will all recall how well America did by our policy of engagement with Soviet Russia, which got a long succession of American corporations burned — and how well we are profiting from our policy of engagement with China, which looks to displace the dollar with the yuan as the world’s central currency. What delights have we to look forward to from this new “engagement“, which promises to import sharia deep into our society?
In terms of the outside world, Obama (PBUH) is involving America in international associations of a distinctly Islamo-fascist-friendly flavor. One example is the Alliance of Civilizations which Obama (PBUH) joined on our behalf this year.
Here is a sample of AoC’s attitudes toward freedom from the mouth of U.N. High Representative for the Alliance of Civilizations (and mighty Poo-Bah) Jorge Sampaio:
There is a balance to be found between freedom of expression and respect for religion and for religious feelings and principles.
Oh brother! Tell me I don’t need to explain that. Here’s the AoC on Israel:
the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948, [began] a chain of events that continues to be one of the most tortuous in relations between Western and Muslim societies. Israel’s continuing occupation of Palestinian and other Arab territories … are primary causes of resentment and anger in the Muslim world toward Western nations. This occupation has been perceived in the Muslim world as a form of colonialism and has led many to believe, rightly or wrongly, that Israel is in collusion with “the West”.
Yeah. That’s a club we need to belong to. And by joining it Obama (PBUH) gives them, and their pronouncements, his blessing.
On the domestic side Obama (PBUH) is involving the government and its agencies in relations with a variety of individuals and organizations of a decidedly Islamo-fascist bent. One notable example is Ingrid Mattson of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), which is in turn a friendly affiliate of the the Muslim Brotherhood.
Another is the Leadership Group on U.S.-Muslim Engagement, a virtual rogues gallery of leftists, Islamo-fascists and fellow travelers including the brilliant Dalia Mogahed, who we met earlier, and what would you know, Daisy Khan and Imam Rauf of the NYC 9/11 Victory Commemoration Mosque.
Their mission statement, as you might expect, is about as clear as mud, consisting entirely of government nicey-nice. But among their goals they list:
… bringing together educational leaders from the U.S. and Muslim-majority countries to identify top priorities for cross-societal education …
How likely is it, do you think, that “cross-societal education” means promoting the ideals of personal liberty, equality before the law and independence of thought among young Mohammedans? … ? … ? … ? … Me neither.
What we are likely to see, is a continuous and widespread whitewashing of the deficiencies and dangers of Mohammedan culture, ideology and law, with a thick slippery layer of sweet meaningless folk culture and kumbayah — but with a distinctly anti-western pro-Islamic slant.
And that in turn will cripple our ability to fight.
DIMITTIS PULLOS SUB CUSTODIA VULPIS
In the election of Obama we have certainly set the fox to guard the henhouse. He stands in the tradition of Woodrow Wilson, FDR and that malign intellectual pigmy Jimmy Carter — who bequeathed to us the monstrosity of modern Iran — as an enemy of all that is best in America, and all that has contributed to our success, our well being and our power in the world. And he might, in the extraordinary degree of his foreign sympathies, surpass them all.
The damage Obama is doing to our defense against Islamo-fascism may be less apparent than the damage that he is doing to the economy, as it doesn’t show up in your weekly paycheck or expenses. But you can bet your bottom dollar — which you may be reaching soon — that the damage is every bit as deep and just as deadly. Either could bring the end of the American age.
Id like to end this on a joke but I simply can’t. It’s too grim.
We are at a cross roads, and we have already started down the wrong path.
Certainly it is possible for America to prevail, despite opposition, indeed enmity from the top. America is the birthplace of the revolution for individual rights and individual freedom. It is deeply woven into the fabric of our culture. And we are not done yet.
But it will not be possible if we are overconfident, if we imagine the victory is guaranteed.
Obama represents not only Islamic totalitarianism — against which the world has struggled for more than a millenium — but also the more modern but just as deadly communist totalitarianism. And this had better remind us that America has still not recovered fully from the encounter with communism. We struggle with the aftereffects to this day, in our schools, our laws, in our entire political life.
While we may claim to have won the geopolitical and military battle with the communists, we cannot claim a clear win in the ideological battle against communism within America’s borders. And we had better take this as a warning about the costs and difficulty of ideological battle.
We must understand what we are up against. We must be sure of our own minds. So don’t take it from me. Look into it yourself and satisfy your own requirements for certainty.
Believe your eyes and heed your conscience. Act.
