Error: Unable to create directory uploads/2019/01. Is its parent directory writable by the server?

The Paul Krugman Con: Social Security

Posted on June 22 2010 10:00 pm
Be Sociable, Share!
Print This Post Print This Post

Paul Krugman

Know what really bugs me about Paul Krugman? It’s that he’s a Nobel Prize  winner in economics who’s probably forgotten more about the subject than most of us will ever know. So, what does he do with all that knowledge? Very little, actually. In fact, a large part of his shtick is to say ridiculously stupid things about  the  economy that panders  to liberal sensibilities. In other words, instead of using the tremendous amount of knowledge he has to try to better people’s lives, Krugman instead uses it to enhance his credibility while he misleads people. It would be like Greg LeMond getting paid millions to convince people that they need to become experts at riding  tricycles to become Tour De France champions.

Now, if you’re wondering what inspired this outburst, beyond Krugman’s usual nonsense, it’s his latest deliberately deceptive ramblings on Social Security:

We went through all this at length back in 2005, but let me do this yet again.

Social Security is a government program funded by a dedicated tax. There are two ways to look at this. First, you can simply view the program as part of the general federal budget, with the dedicated tax bit just a formality. And there’s a lot to be said for that point of view; if you take it, benefits are a federal cost, payroll taxes a source of revenue, and they don’t really have anything to do with each other.

Alternatively, you can look at Social Security on its own. And as a practical matter, this has considerable significance too; as long as Social Security still has funds in its trust fund, it doesn’t need new legislation to keep paying promised benefits.

OK, so two views, both of some use. But here’s what you can’t do: you can’t have it both ways. You can’t say that for the last 25 years, when Social Security ran surpluses, well, that didn’t mean anything, because it’s just part of the federal government — but when payroll taxes fall short of benefits, even though there’s lots of money in the trust fund, Social Security is broke.

And bear in mind what happens when payroll receipts fall short of benefits: NOTHING. No new action is required; the checks just keep going out.

So according to Krugman, since Social Security ran a surplus for all those years, all is well! Nothing to see here — and it’s silly to suggest otherwise…except, what happened to those surpluses?

Continue reading at Right Wing News.

Be Sociable, Share!
One Response leave one →

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

Copyright 2019 NewsReal Blog

The Theme Foundry