Comments on: Renegade Leftist Judge Permanently Restores ACORN’s Taxpayer Funding

By: ACORN On “Life Support”; Shouldn’t It Be Dead Already? | NewsReal Blog

Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:46:15 +0000

[...] stay a judge’s ruling that prevents the federal government from de-funding ACORN. Renegade federal judge Nina Gershon of the Eastern District of New York ruled it was an unconstitutional bill of attainder (punishment [...]

By: ACORN Dies But Like An Indestructible Fictional Android Assassin It’ll Be Baaaack | NewsReal Blog

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:11:20 +0000

[...] memo came a week after renegade federal judge Nina Gershon of the Eastern District of New York made permanent her temporary injunction prohibiting Congress [...]

By: Obama Refunds ACORN for Healthcare Support – Funds Given « The Dysfunction of Maryland Politics and The National Scene

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:48:17 +0000

[...] memo came a week after renegade federal judge Nina Gershon of the Eastern District of New York made permanent her temporary injunction prohibiting Congress [...]

By: No Mighty Oaks Here; ACORN Is Gone

No Mighty Oaks Here; ACORN Is Gone — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:42:37 +0000

[...] a variety of crimes including child prostitution and tax evasion. The memo came a week after renegade federal judge Nina Gershon of the Eastern District of New York made permanent her temporary injunction prohibiting Congress [...]

By: The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Obama Restores Cash-Strapped ACORN's Funding As Reward For Loyal Health Care Support

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:18:10 +0000

[...] memo came a week after renegade federal judge Nina Gershon of the Eastern District of New York made permanent her temporary injunction prohibiting Congress [...]

By: » Breaking: While An Anxious Nation Is Transfixed By The Healthcare Debate, The Obama Administration Restores ACORN Funding - Big Government

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:00:07 +0000

[...] memo came a week after renegade federal judge Nina Gershon of the Eastern District of New York made permanent her temporary injunction prohibiting Congress [...]

By: Jason

Jason — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:41:35 +0000

This is why republicans will lose the next election… you are all batsheet crazy.

By: Swemson

Swemson — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:27:22 +0000

You don't sound emotional at all…

You're just wrong!

In ever single one of the items you addressed, your assumptions are 180 degrees from truth & reality.

By: Judger

Judger — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:05:06 +0000

How does it make sense to say something like "Liberals HATE facts and truth, they are creatures of emotion, not reason". You can't really think that ALL liberals are like that. Obviously there are good arguments on both sides of the debate or else there wouldn't be a debate. There is a way to disagree with someone and still not call them out as irrational. Liberals and conservatives share many of the same goals for the country. They both want the country to be free and prosperous. It is a question of how to achieve those goals.

Having said that, why do you think that "Big government never has worked and never will"? I can think of a number of countries where big government works pretty damn well. I'd also like to see your argument for how gun control "=" increased violent crimes. For point 4, conservatives often hold that massive social security fraud is taking place AND illegal aliens are bankrupting the government. If an illegal alien presents a bogus social security card where do you think that money goes? The money goes into social security. Because they are illegal they cannot withdraw whatever their employer puts into social security for them. That doesn't sound like something that will bankrupt the government. So the argument against illegals on grounds of social security grounds doesn't hold water.

Does it sound like I am a creature of emotion and not a creature of reason? Or do you think maybe you went too far in calling ALL liberals irrational and emotional? Maybe your emotions got the better of you and you weren't thinking rationally or intelligently.

p.s. haha just realized your statements about liberals would apply to supposedly liberal academia including all sorts of scientists. What better examples are there of cold, calculating rationality than scientists? Surely you don't mean that.

By: Jim

Jim — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 01:06:06 +0000

Why are Liberals so stupid? If you like Socialism, please MOVE ! This is the last "free" country left in this screwed up world. Why are liberals trying so hard to destroy it? Big government never has worked and never will. Liberals HATE facts and truth, they are creatures of emotion, not reason.

1. Welfare = destruction of families and increased dependence on government.
2. Social Security = destruction of financial independence & increased govt. dependence.
3. Gun Control= increased violent crimes (lots of data to prove this).
4. Illegal aliens= bankrupt hospitals, schools and police departments.

The list goes on and on and on….

By: WilliamJamesWard

WilliamJamesWard — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:59:21 +0000

It is interesting if that is the language used in the judgement, as the judge clearly speaks to
deprivation of opportunity, yet does not state where it occured and insinuates in and
insouciant way and obligation by Congress and thus the government to
fund sans application. If it was not so stupid it would be relegated to the idiot box of
law school dropouts which does not deserve that much insult…………..
However as this is ad hoc legislating from the bench any thing is game, and as far as
it goes it is just more pulling of the chain…………..William

By: WilliamJamesWard

WilliamJamesWard — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:42:04 +0000

Yes!