Cash for Water Heaters? Bet That’ll Work About as Well as Cash for Clunkers…
Posted on March 6 2010 1:30 pm
Get ready to get in line for your next rebate opportunity as these programs go as fast as they come. The organizer in chief is on a roll with a new idea for saving jobs, creating jobs, reducing our dependence on oil, boosting the economy, along with clunkers being discarded before their time. Hmmm? How did the other cash for clunkers program work. Did not. Did not. Did not.
Obama sees the job as president as “seeing to it that every American that wants to work and is able to work can find a job,” And that’s why he’s proposing a cash rebate for anyone who upgrades their water heaters, air conditioners, home appliances, insulation, toasters, coffee makers, lawnmowers to “Homestar” approval. Now he did not specifically mention all of those appliances, as what’s to be included in the program has yet to be written into law. Also not yet determined is who will qualify, where they must be purchased, who can install the items, and for how many billions the program will last. Also, not determined is who will pay for the program. Also not determined is how will it create jobs for Americans who want to find one.
Obama spells out rebates for energy efficiency.
Obama said the administration’s “HOMESTAR” program would reward people who buy energy-saving equipment with an on-the-spot rebate of $1,000 or more. He cast the idea as one that would save people money on utility bills, boost the economy and reduce American dependence on oil.
“That was my focus last year and that is my focus this year,” he said, “to lay a foundation for economic growth that creates jobs.”
Has he ever thought about just reducing taxes across the board? Reducing federal mandates? Reducing federal agencies? Congress working part time jobs shoveling snow to help pay down the deficit?
And now to a question the organizer in chief has not thought about either: What article of the constitution authorizes the president, or congress to send out tax money to the special few who purchase specific products?
The general welfare clause? That’s the answer we’ll get, if the media ever thinks of even asking that question.





















