Comments on: Maddow Misinforms, Muckrakes to Stop Stupak

By: Alice

Alice — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:23:36 +0000

Ah, theft, murder, bribery, and fraud are ever-present parts of human society and we outlawed all of them. If a person believes that abortion kills an innocent human being with rights, wanting it to be outlawed is the only logical response.

By: Jake

Jake — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:38:21 +0000

Would someone please show me the language in the bill that allows federal funds to pay for abortions. It seems Congressman Stupak has lost hie Avatar.

Max, you've said it all. Nothing like refreshing the memory cells of the short memoried right. .
Anybody know why Limbaugh would want to live in Costa Rica?
They've had single payer healthcare for just over 60 years now. Even gringos who live their are extremely happy with it. I guess RL liked it so much awhile back in Hawaii that he thinks its really a pretty good way for people to not be wards and victims of the Health insurance rackets and syndicates.

I have a friend who runs a travel agency,so Rush can just let me know when he needs a ticket.

By: Will Simons

Will Simons — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:48:37 +0000

This was the EXACT article I was hoping to find, except…

It was not the Maddow show I had in mind. Have you considered doing another one on subsequent segments she's done on Stupak? Specifically, she is now saying that the abortion concerns Stupak has are not even in the Senate's legislation. I'd love to see you do an analysis of that. I have no way of knowing if she has a point or is distorting.

By: DavidForsmark

DavidForsmark — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:39:15 +0000

Nice try, Max, Bart Stupak is in NO way in the gubernatorial conversation in Michigan. Maddow is making this up.

By: WilliamJamesWard

WilliamJamesWard — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 04:41:25 +0000

Ganymede, the fact of abortion is a bad thing in
the minds of most caring people but to use our tax dollars, yours or mine if we are in moral
objection and it violates our conscience is not acceptable. I can not think of anything more
morally objectionable than the attack on innocent life, I refuse to have any part in it, and
I should not be having my tax dollar help what I detest. That you think Christians would have
anything to do with killing gay people is hard to believe if you have lived in America long,
I can not fathom such and idea, you have a ways to go in understanding what is evil and
what is real…………Regards, William

By: PaulMCooper

PaulMCooper — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 04:31:45 +0000

Well I don't help their ratings. I watch clips of the shows on youtube:)

By: PaulMCooper

PaulMCooper — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 04:30:24 +0000

Ganymede,
Your comment doesn't make sense. Stupak is simply trying to keep tax payer funded abortions out of health care. That will not make abortion illegal. It will simply means tax money won't go to abortions. The vast majority of Americans are against gov't funded abortions.

By: Ganymede

Ganymede — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 23:41:44 +0000

Hello Looney Tunes, Bart Stupack, Bart Simpson, what's in a name. What you Horowitz-ites don't get is that the issue of abortion is a scam. No one is for abortion, but every authentic human being understands that you can't outlaw something that's always been an ever present part of human society. Yes, everything should be done to reduce the incidence of abortion but only fools and evil-doers would forcibly try to prevent a woman from deciding for herself what to do with her body. Also, the C Street House already has a wellknown reputation for housing some of the bigger 'Christian' hypocrites in Washington such as Ensign and the idiots who got the Ugandan government to outlaw and try to execute gay people. For Stupack to gtrandstand on the abortion issue when tens of thousands of people are dying each year in this country because of our broken down health care system is at best stupid.

By: James Gibson

James Gibson — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:54:23 +0000

I am now firmly convinced that well over half of all the people viewing Maddow, Olberman, Matthews, and even Schultz are either paid by the Daily Caller or otherwise doing it just to comment on how bad they are.

Put another way, if everyone stopped watching just to hear them rant, MSNBCs ratings would completely tank and they would be off the air like Air America. Which would be no big loss to me.

I stopped viewing Matthews a few years ago when I couldn't stand anymore his rants: We're occupying South Korea, the war in Iraq was for Oil, the war in Afghanistan the same, That Matthews (in 2008) had been watching Obama for years and knew him very well.

As for Maddow, I actually stopped watching Tucker since they would constantly have Rachel on in these kitchen table segments. I have never watched her program which was begun just to ride the Obama tide in late 2008.

Finally as for Oberman, I have never forgiven him for disavowing the existence of a nuclear weapon in order to attack George Bush. I won't even watch the football games if they have him on for play-by-play.

By: Peachey

Peachey — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:00:03 +0000

Max, so what you are saying is that Ms. Maddow is a pathological liar and an intellectual barbarian?Graduating from from Oxford (with any degree) does not automatically imbue integrity or wisdom.
You can also graduate from Harvard with a law degree and suffer from the same delusions and need to couch radical and anti-American ideological beliefs in the guise of "just looking out for the folks" retoric. Ms Maddow is Olbermann's shadow on camera and has taken on the attempt to mimic Olbermann's on-camera rage and outlandish grandstanding and posturing. I actually do not watch her show, and deeply admire all of those that give of themselves to watch and analyze. The clips of her deceitful and reckless presentations are too much for us mere mortals. It takes the stamina exhibited by Paul, the Birkel team and others to sit and watch the display and give us analysis.Thank you.

By: Chris

Chris — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:57:30 +0000

Max, in your blog you imply that many members of congress are affilliated with C street Housing organization. Are you implying that Rep. Bart Stupak IS affilliated with the "The Family"? Because he stated that he doesn't know anything about that.

By: WilliamJamesWard

WilliamJamesWard — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:58:54 +0000

Who is ignored is Olberman and Maddow, that they are deserving of ridicule is self evident.
Max forgot her most outstanding credit, she is leftist with no observable redeaming qualities.
Oh and Max may be unaware that Rep. Stupak has had a long standing objection to
abortion and Maddow's comments are specious at best, and to make a simple observation
Mr. Stupak is a politician and in the pursuit of his own agenda, a Democrat that is in opposition
to the leftist desire for abortion on demand paid for by our taxes.