Comments on: Ryan Sorba is an Arrogant Tool

By: Media Matters Swings At my FOX News Segment and Misses | NewsReal Blog

Media Matters Swings At my FOX News Segment and Misses | NewsReal Blog — Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:20:34 +0000

[...] Apparently aware that their case is weak, Media Matters attacks the president of the Christian Action Network, Martin Mawyer, where I serve as National Security Advisor, for comments he made over a decade ago regarding homosexuality that he has since admitted regret over. I joined CAN after their campaign against gay marriage ended and have had no role in that issue. Mawyer has not expressed bigotry or hatred towards anyone to me at any moment, including homosexuals. My own personal views on the issue (which Media Matters conveniently leaves out) can be read here and here. I also publicly referred to anti-homosexual crusader Ryan Sorba as an “arrogant tool” here. [...]

By: The Blue and “Teh Ghey”—A Brewing Civil War on the Right? :

The Blue and “Teh Ghey”—A Brewing Civil War on the Right? : — Wed, 29 Dec 2010 23:29:37 +0000

[...] chops—was in 2010, when anti-gay activist and “Young Americans for Freedom” organizer Ryan Sorba was invited to give a speech about his efforts to expose ACORN’s anti-American activities… and [...]

By: shadow_man

shadow_man — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:53:13 +0000

To those of you using the Bible as a weapon against homosexuality, you are wrong. Homosexuality is not a sin. The Bible is constantly being taken out of context to support anti-gay views. Any educated Christian would know that. Scholars who have studied the Bible in context of the times and in relation to other passages have shown those passages (Leviticus, Corinthians, Romans, etc) have nothing to do with homosexuality. These passages often cherry-picked while ignoring the rest of the Bible. The sins theses passages are referring to are idolatry, Greek temple sex worship, prostitution, pederasty with teen boys, and rape, not homosexuality or two loving consenting adults.

By: shadow_man

shadow_man — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:51:07 +0000

Repost since it's obvious many posters are still clueless about sexual orientation.

For those of you claiming homosexuality is a "lifestyle", that is a false and ignorant statement. Homosexuality is not a choice. Just like you don't choose the color of your skin, you cannot choose whom you are sexually attracted to. If you can, sorry, but you are not heterosexual, you are bi-sexual. Virtually all major psychological and medical experts agree that sexual orientation is NOT a choice. Most gay people will tell you its not a choice. Common sense will tell you its not a choice. While science is relatively new to studying homosexuality, studies tend to indicate that its biological.

http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/03/differen...
http://www.newscientist.com/channel/sex/dn14146-g...
Gay, Straight Men's Brain Responses Differ
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,155990,00.htm...
http://www.livescience.com/health/060224_gay_gene...
http://www.springerlink.com/content/w27453600k586...
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/06...

There is overwhelming scientific evidence that homosexuality is not a choice. Sexual orientation is generally a biological trait that is determined pre-natally, although there is no one certain thing that explains all of the cases. "Nurture" may have some effect, but for the most part it is biological.

And it should also be noted that:
"It is worth noting that many medical and scientific organizations do believe it is impossible to change a person's sexual orientation and this is displayed in a statement by American Academy of Pediatrics, American Counseling Association, American Association of School Administrators, American Federation of Teachers, American Psychiatric Association, American Psychological Association, American School Health Association, Interfaith Alliance Foundation, National Association of School Psychologists, National Association of Social Workers, and National Education Association."

By: shadow_man

shadow_man — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:47:57 +0000

Also if you still think homosexuality is a lifestyle despite all credible scientific organizations saying it's not, answer the following questions: Are you male? (If not, reverse the questions to the other gender) If so, Are you sexually attracted to other men? Would you be able to enjoy sex with a man? Do you get sexual urges with a man? Do men turn you on sexually and emotionally? Could you be happy with a man sexually for the rest of your life? Does male/male porn or male sexual situations turn you on and arouse you?

I'm sure i won't be hearing from you again

By: shadow_man

shadow_man — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:46:55 +0000

Lmao, another clueless person who claims "lifestyle" Homosexuality is not a choice. Just like you don't choose the color of your skin, you cannot choose whom you are sexually attracted to. Virtually all major psychological and medical experts agree that sexual orientation is NOT a choice. Most gay people will tell you its not a choice. Common sense will tell you its not a choice. While science is relatively new to studying homosexuality, studies tend to indicate that its biological.

Also, the only harm done to children is teaching them intolerance and bigotry. Teaching them the false notion that homosexuality is a "lifestyle" Sorry, but as science and logic disproves more and more of your lies and distortions, you will realize why you will inevitably lose this battle.

By: DavidSwindle

DavidSwindle — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:31:52 +0000

Well done!

By: shadow_man

shadow_man — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:49:26 +0000

Except it's not a "special right" If marriage is a special right, then heterosexuals currently are the only ones that have that special right. Denying that right to homosexuals but giving that special right to heterosexuals is discrimination and inequality.

By: shadow_man

shadow_man — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:43:47 +0000

Religious people who vote other people's civil rights away deserve no respect. It goes both ways son.

By: shadow_man

shadow_man — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:42:42 +0000

The problem is, science disproves every single one of his "theories"

By: shadow_man

shadow_man — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:39:42 +0000

That's just like saying we don't hate black people, just as long as they don't change the traditional meaning of marriage of a white man and white woman, black man and black woman, etc. It's prejudice. Claiming is not simply makes you look laughable. And if you support traditional things, you support slavery, subjugation of women, woman being property of their husbands, etc. Those all existed for majority of mankind. That doesn't make them right.

By: shadow_man

shadow_man — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:33:32 +0000

Then stop sticking your nose in other peoples life and bedrooms and denying them their civil rights.