<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tim Tebow the Abuser and His Poor, Defenseless Mom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/09/tim-tebow-the-abuser-and-his-poor-defenseless-mom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/09/tim-tebow-the-abuser-and-his-poor-defenseless-mom/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:34:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: criolle johnny</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/09/tim-tebow-the-abuser-and-his-poor-defenseless-mom/#comment-59254</link>
		<dc:creator>criolle johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30928#comment-59254</guid>
		<description>How many feminists does it take to screw in a light bulb? 
That&#039;s NOT funny! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many feminists does it take to screw in a light bulb?<br />
That&#39;s NOT funny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buttery Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/09/tim-tebow-the-abuser-and-his-poor-defenseless-mom/#comment-54669</link>
		<dc:creator>Buttery Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30928#comment-54669</guid>
		<description>&quot;What I find so funny about this is that: before the Super Bowl, NOW (National Organization of Women) criticized the ad (without EVER seeing it) for being &quot;anti-women&quot;, &quot;anti-abortion&quot;, &quot;anti-choice&quot;, &quot;anti-rights&quot;,&quot; 
 
No, they criticized Focus On The Family for being all of those things, which they are. I don&#039;t know if they said &quot;anti-rights&quot; but they called them homophobic, which they also are. I&#039;d correct all of the other misinformation and flat-out bogus stuff on this page, but I don&#039;t have all day. What happened to honesty as a virtue in this country? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;What I find so funny about this is that: before the Super Bowl, NOW (National Organization of Women) criticized the ad (without EVER seeing it) for being &quot;anti-women&quot;, &quot;anti-abortion&quot;, &quot;anti-choice&quot;, &quot;anti-rights&quot;,&quot; </p>
<p>No, they criticized Focus On The Family for being all of those things, which they are. I don&#039;t know if they said &quot;anti-rights&quot; but they called them homophobic, which they also are. I&#039;d correct all of the other misinformation and flat-out bogus stuff on this page, but I don&#039;t have all day. What happened to honesty as a virtue in this country?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buttery Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/09/tim-tebow-the-abuser-and-his-poor-defenseless-mom/#comment-54665</link>
		<dc:creator>Buttery Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30928#comment-54665</guid>
		<description>&quot;Under a definition this broad, it&#8217;s easy to see why Ms. O&#8217;Neil thinks pushing one&#8217;s mother aside in a joking manner is evidence of violence. (Feminists have no sense of humor, you know.)&quot; 
 
This is an absolute lie. I just can&#039;t stand 75% of conservatives for this reason. Even when they&#039;re tearing down a fairly easy target such as this (the ad was a CELEBRATION OF VIOLENCE!!!!) they just have to lie about it. In the context of the commercial, he hits her in the side at full running speed, imitating a linebacker hitting a QB. Don&#039;t lie and position this as a harmless little push, because it wasn&#039;t. That doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s some big anti-female thing, but I personally found it kinda weird. I mean, they do this benign commercial with the seemingly intended message that the Tebows are a loving family, and then they show him blindside her like she got hit by a frigging bus and knocking her off her feet. I love my mom and I wouldn&#039;t do that to her, so it just kinda caught me off guard and didn&#039;t make any sense. 
 
I know you guys will love to talk about this as long as possible, because you get to, once again, talk about &quot;those daggone feminists and their lack of a sense of humor&quot;, and the feminist groups, to their dis-credit, took the bait, but just be honest. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Under a definition this broad, it&rsquo;s easy to see why Ms. O&rsquo;Neil thinks pushing one&rsquo;s mother aside in a joking manner is evidence of violence. (Feminists have no sense of humor, you know.)&quot; </p>
<p>This is an absolute lie. I just can&#039;t stand 75% of conservatives for this reason. Even when they&#039;re tearing down a fairly easy target such as this (the ad was a CELEBRATION OF VIOLENCE!!!!) they just have to lie about it. In the context of the commercial, he hits her in the side at full running speed, imitating a linebacker hitting a QB. Don&#039;t lie and position this as a harmless little push, because it wasn&#039;t. That doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s some big anti-female thing, but I personally found it kinda weird. I mean, they do this benign commercial with the seemingly intended message that the Tebows are a loving family, and then they show him blindside her like she got hit by a frigging bus and knocking her off her feet. I love my mom and I wouldn&#039;t do that to her, so it just kinda caught me off guard and didn&#039;t make any sense. </p>
<p>I know you guys will love to talk about this as long as possible, because you get to, once again, talk about &quot;those daggone feminists and their lack of a sense of humor&quot;, and the feminist groups, to their dis-credit, took the bait, but just be honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gloria Allred: The Quintessential American Feminist &#187; Right Pundits</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/09/tim-tebow-the-abuser-and-his-poor-defenseless-mom/#comment-54413</link>
		<dc:creator>Gloria Allred: The Quintessential American Feminist &#187; Right Pundits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30928#comment-54413</guid>
		<description>[...] off her nipple rings in a  Texas airport. And, most recently, Allred was on board with the whole Tim Tebow ad debacle &#8212; and hashed it out with Megyn Kelly of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] off her nipple rings in a  Texas airport. And, most recently, Allred was on board with the whole Tim Tebow ad debacle &#8212; and hashed it out with Megyn Kelly of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jen</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/09/tim-tebow-the-abuser-and-his-poor-defenseless-mom/#comment-52916</link>
		<dc:creator>jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30928#comment-52916</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe what I just read. Have any of you ever been beaten to the point you could not see, walk or eat or needed 5 brain surgeries to even remember how to cook an egg? Have you ever had a sister, mother, aunt, friend murdered by a spouse? What you are calling feminism is just ignorance on your part as to the real reason women want abuse stopped! It is not whining it is awareness! Do your homework! One in three women will be abused at some point in their life and I bet you know her. I am ashamed of you. Especially Ms. Venker!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe what I just read. Have any of you ever been beaten to the point you could not see, walk or eat or needed 5 brain surgeries to even remember how to cook an egg? Have you ever had a sister, mother, aunt, friend murdered by a spouse? What you are calling feminism is just ignorance on your part as to the real reason women want abuse stopped! It is not whining it is awareness! Do your homework! One in three women will be abused at some point in their life and I bet you know her. I am ashamed of you. Especially Ms. Venker!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aenarion28</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/09/tim-tebow-the-abuser-and-his-poor-defenseless-mom/#comment-50793</link>
		<dc:creator>Aenarion28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30928#comment-50793</guid>
		<description>To Henpecked: The problem with feminism is that they want their &#039;equal rights&#039; but they want to keep their &#039;womens benefits&#039; like the man picking up the check, the man giving up his seat, etc.  But the problem is that the movement has been hijacked by radicals. 
 
The truth is feminism is now being touted by these leaders as a Nazi-esque movement that believe women are superior to men, that men need to be regulated to second class citizens, that all men today are responsible for every bad thing that has happened to women 200 years ago, that just looking at a woman is rape, or that consensual sex between men and women is also rape. 
 
In a equal society, which feminists claim to want, both men and women would be paying alimony but now that women can make more money then men, these &#039;strong&#039; women whine and complain that they may now have to pay alimony to men. 
 
Feminists are also like religious fanatics/Fox News pundits in that they reconstruct reality to fit their views regardless of the facts.  For example, a study was done about domestic violence in relationships and it was discovered that lesbian relationships had the highest incidence of domestic violence.  The feminists did what they could to bury the conclusions because it did not support their mantra that only men are violent.   
 
In addition, the data stated that in domestic violence, women are just as violent as men, and while physically a man can beat a woman, a woman can inflict just as much damage in that they use weapons and start the conflict by taking the man completely by surprise. 
 
What I also find pathetic about feminists is that they say they don&#039;t need men yet in divorce they go for everything then when men don&#039;t marry because of divorce, they make new laws stating a guy has to support a woman if their live-in relation lasted x amount of years. 
 
Because of feminism, there is a saying that goes &#039;Happiness is having a American Salary, a Chinese Cook, an English house and a (insert nationality here) wife.  Misery is having a (insert nationality here) salary, an English cook, a Chinese house and an American wife.&#039; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Henpecked: The problem with feminism is that they want their &#039;equal rights&#039; but they want to keep their &#039;womens benefits&#039; like the man picking up the check, the man giving up his seat, etc.  But the problem is that the movement has been hijacked by radicals. </p>
<p>The truth is feminism is now being touted by these leaders as a Nazi-esque movement that believe women are superior to men, that men need to be regulated to second class citizens, that all men today are responsible for every bad thing that has happened to women 200 years ago, that just looking at a woman is rape, or that consensual sex between men and women is also rape. </p>
<p>In a equal society, which feminists claim to want, both men and women would be paying alimony but now that women can make more money then men, these &#039;strong&#039; women whine and complain that they may now have to pay alimony to men. </p>
<p>Feminists are also like religious fanatics/Fox News pundits in that they reconstruct reality to fit their views regardless of the facts.  For example, a study was done about domestic violence in relationships and it was discovered that lesbian relationships had the highest incidence of domestic violence.  The feminists did what they could to bury the conclusions because it did not support their mantra that only men are violent.   </p>
<p>In addition, the data stated that in domestic violence, women are just as violent as men, and while physically a man can beat a woman, a woman can inflict just as much damage in that they use weapons and start the conflict by taking the man completely by surprise. </p>
<p>What I also find pathetic about feminists is that they say they don&#039;t need men yet in divorce they go for everything then when men don&#039;t marry because of divorce, they make new laws stating a guy has to support a woman if their live-in relation lasted x amount of years. </p>
<p>Because of feminism, there is a saying that goes &#039;Happiness is having a American Salary, a Chinese Cook, an English house and a (insert nationality here) wife.  Misery is having a (insert nationality here) salary, an English cook, a Chinese house and an American wife.&#039;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VinceP1974</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/09/tim-tebow-the-abuser-and-his-poor-defenseless-mom/#comment-50720</link>
		<dc:creator>VinceP1974</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30928#comment-50720</guid>
		<description>How anyone takes these people seriously after what Clinton did is a mystery to me </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How anyone takes these people seriously after what Clinton did is a mystery to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dixie</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/09/tim-tebow-the-abuser-and-his-poor-defenseless-mom/#comment-50608</link>
		<dc:creator>dixie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30928#comment-50608</guid>
		<description>national organization of whiners.....please give it a rest. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>national organization of whiners&#8230;..please give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henpecked</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/09/tim-tebow-the-abuser-and-his-poor-defenseless-mom/#comment-50600</link>
		<dc:creator>Henpecked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30928#comment-50600</guid>
		<description>According to the article, &quot;Under the VAWA, domestic acts don&#8217;t have to be violent to be punished under the definition of domestic violence. Name-calling, put-downs, shouting, negative looks or gestures, ignoring opinions, or constant criticizing can all be legally labeled domestic violence.&quot; 
 
  So, what if the wife does it? Ever get a dirty look from the little woman? Criticism? Name calling? Why isn&#039;t it abuse if the woman does it? Happens all the time. It&#039;s OK then, right? Gee, that&#039;s fair... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the article, &quot;Under the VAWA, domestic acts don&rsquo;t have to be violent to be punished under the definition of domestic violence. Name-calling, put-downs, shouting, negative looks or gestures, ignoring opinions, or constant criticizing can all be legally labeled domestic violence.&quot; </p>
<p>  So, what if the wife does it? Ever get a dirty look from the little woman? Criticism? Name calling? Why isn&#039;t it abuse if the woman does it? Happens all the time. It&#039;s OK then, right? Gee, that&#039;s fair&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JennQPublic</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/09/tim-tebow-the-abuser-and-his-poor-defenseless-mom/#comment-50469</link>
		<dc:creator>JennQPublic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30928#comment-50469</guid>
		<description>Suzanne wrote:  &quot;Moreover, they package their policies &#8211; such as the Violence against Women Act (VAWA) &#8211; in such a way that people feel compelled to sympathize.&quot; 
 
This same strategy is used over and over: the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, Al Franken&#039;s so-called Anti-Rape Amendment, and many other pieces of legislation are given titles that scream, &quot;You&#039;re a misogynist if you vote against this.&quot;  Meanwhile, the bills are almost never about helping women, they&#039;re about advancing elements of the anti-capitalist far Left agenda. 
 
Nice to see you blogging at NewsReal, Suzanne! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suzanne wrote:  &quot;Moreover, they package their policies &ndash; such as the Violence against Women Act (VAWA) &ndash; in such a way that people feel compelled to sympathize.&quot; </p>
<p>This same strategy is used over and over: the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, Al Franken&#039;s so-called Anti-Rape Amendment, and many other pieces of legislation are given titles that scream, &quot;You&#039;re a misogynist if you vote against this.&quot;  Meanwhile, the bills are almost never about helping women, they&#039;re about advancing elements of the anti-capitalist far Left agenda. </p>
<p>Nice to see you blogging at NewsReal, Suzanne!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pops</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/09/tim-tebow-the-abuser-and-his-poor-defenseless-mom/#comment-50446</link>
		<dc:creator>Pops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30928#comment-50446</guid>
		<description>I swear these people have dark hearts and refuse to use the brain that God gave them.  Because they are unhappy, everybody needs to be unhappy.  They make my ears bleed with their screeching... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I swear these people have dark hearts and refuse to use the brain that God gave them.  Because they are unhappy, everybody needs to be unhappy.  They make my ears bleed with their screeching&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul T.</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/09/tim-tebow-the-abuser-and-his-poor-defenseless-mom/#comment-50298</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30928#comment-50298</guid>
		<description>What I find so funny about this is that: before the Super Bowl, NOW (National Organization of Women) criticized the ad (without EVER seeing it) for being &quot;anti-women&quot;, &quot;anti-abortion&quot;, &quot;anti-choice&quot;, &quot;anti-rights&quot;, yet they don&#039;t realize that Pam Tebow CHOSE to NOT have an abortion, that&#039;s her choice. I&#039;m pro-abortion, and this pisses me off for them to criticize her choice. THEN after it aired, they change their position from being &quot;anti-women&quot;, &quot;anti-abortion&quot;, &quot;anti-choice&quot;, &quot;anti-rights&quot; toooo &quot;anti-women&quot; (I guess they kept that), &quot;pro-violence against women&quot;. Whaat? She&#039;s showing how strong she is. Oh what, women CANT be strong, they must be weak and must listen, MUST listen, to the National Organization of Women (NOW) or... else..  I like what Jim Norton said about it on Red Eye. He say&#039;s that, that was pro-violence against women like the Jay Len0-Oprah Winfrey-David Letterman ad was pro-3 ways. They truly are just trying to find something to criticize. Pam Tebow was showing how strong she was, stronger than any players to go against her HEISMAN winning son. And ALSO that she is STRONGER than her son. Watch him play, and say he&#039;s not strong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find so funny about this is that: before the Super Bowl, NOW (National Organization of Women) criticized the ad (without EVER seeing it) for being &#8220;anti-women&#8221;, &#8220;anti-abortion&#8221;, &#8220;anti-choice&#8221;, &#8220;anti-rights&#8221;, yet they don&#8217;t realize that Pam Tebow CHOSE to NOT have an abortion, that&#8217;s her choice. I&#8217;m pro-abortion, and this pisses me off for them to criticize her choice. THEN after it aired, they change their position from being &#8220;anti-women&#8221;, &#8220;anti-abortion&#8221;, &#8220;anti-choice&#8221;, &#8220;anti-rights&#8221; toooo &#8220;anti-women&#8221; (I guess they kept that), &#8220;pro-violence against women&#8221;. Whaat? She&#8217;s showing how strong she is. Oh what, women CANT be strong, they must be weak and must listen, MUST listen, to the National Organization of Women (NOW) or&#8230; else..  I like what Jim Norton said about it on Red Eye. He say&#8217;s that, that was pro-violence against women like the Jay Len0-Oprah Winfrey-David Letterman ad was pro-3 ways. They truly are just trying to find something to criticize. Pam Tebow was showing how strong she was, stronger than any players to go against her HEISMAN winning son. And ALSO that she is STRONGER than her son. Watch him play, and say he&#8217;s not strong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

