Gawker Thinks “Teabaggers” are Irrelevant, Writes Treatise About Their Irrelevancy

So many words for such a little thing, right?  I mean, “teabaggers” are nothing more than a bunch of angry white men co opting another angry white man’s literature to effect change.  Silly, inept, irrational middle-agers in tricorner hats, don’t you know that activism is strictly for communists and community organizers?   So says Gawker in its coverage of the official Tea Party Nation convention.

But, how about these guys?  (Content warning.)  Do they qualify as proper protesters?

I just need to be clear on what the rules are.  Thanks.