<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Going Rogue&#8221; Author Would Never Endorse Rand Paul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/08/the-author-of-going-rogue-would-never-have-endorsed-rand-paul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/08/the-author-of-going-rogue-would-never-have-endorsed-rand-paul/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:34:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Wins, America Loses &#171; Calvin Freiburger Online</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/08/the-author-of-going-rogue-would-never-have-endorsed-rand-paul/#comment-102466</link>
		<dc:creator>Rand Wins, America Loses &#171; Calvin Freiburger Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 02:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30605#comment-102466</guid>
		<description>[...] notice, blah blah blah.  Does she know anything about Paul&#8217;s record?  About how he&#8217;s diametrically opposed to her own views on national [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] notice, blah blah blah.  Does she know anything about Paul&#8217;s record?  About how he&#8217;s diametrically opposed to her own views on national [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AllAcrossAmerica</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/08/the-author-of-going-rogue-would-never-have-endorsed-rand-paul/#comment-91345</link>
		<dc:creator>AllAcrossAmerica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 03:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30605#comment-91345</guid>
		<description>Neo-con THIS! How about an America with some common sense. Our troops fight wherever  they are sent. Our freedom has been paid for with their blood. Ron Paul has a decent domestic policy but his foreign policy is a joke. You leave scum like Saddam or the nut in Iran or Venezuela alone long enough and we&#039;ll get our asses attacked again, do any of you Paul morons happen to remember 911 or were you even born yet. 
 
Fiscal responsibly is fine but the NUMBER ONE job of our government is to protect us from our enemies in case any of you Paul kool-aid drinking idiots would like to know.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neo-con THIS! How about an America with some common sense. Our troops fight wherever  they are sent. Our freedom has been paid for with their blood. Ron Paul has a decent domestic policy but his foreign policy is a joke. You leave scum like Saddam or the nut in Iran or Venezuela alone long enough and we&#039;ll get our asses attacked again, do any of you Paul morons happen to remember 911 or were you even born yet. </p>
<p>Fiscal responsibly is fine but the NUMBER ONE job of our government is to protect us from our enemies in case any of you Paul kool-aid drinking idiots would like to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Sarah Palin, It’s Time to Re-Think That Rand Paul (Anti-Israel, Pro-Kokesh) Endorsement! &#124; NewsReal Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/08/the-author-of-going-rogue-would-never-have-endorsed-rand-paul/#comment-90321</link>
		<dc:creator>Dear Sarah Palin, It’s Time to Re-Think That Rand Paul (Anti-Israel, Pro-Kokesh) Endorsement! &#124; NewsReal Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30605#comment-90321</guid>
		<description>[...] of great repute have risked their credibility by backing Rand Paul, including Tea Party First Lady, Sarah Palin. Her endorsement, proudly displayed on Paul’s campaign site, is enough to convince many [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of great repute have risked their credibility by backing Rand Paul, including Tea Party First Lady, Sarah Palin. Her endorsement, proudly displayed on Paul’s campaign site, is enough to convince many [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Brutus</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/08/the-author-of-going-rogue-would-never-have-endorsed-rand-paul/#comment-56370</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Brutus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30605#comment-56370</guid>
		<description>Enlighten me Calvin. I never saw a WMD in Iraq, and I never talked to any other officer who had located any, so perhaps you can tell me where they were, and where they are now?  
 
Saddam did not have WMDs, that is a fact.  
 
Connections to international terrorists? Ok, sure, so does the United States government, we negotiate with insurgents all the time. Does that make us terrorist allies?  
 
Saddam&#039;s primary motivator was power, not ideology. What little ideology he had was fiercely anti-Wahhabi, and pro authoritarian-socialist.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enlighten me Calvin. I never saw a WMD in Iraq, and I never talked to any other officer who had located any, so perhaps you can tell me where they were, and where they are now?  </p>
<p>Saddam did not have WMDs, that is a fact.  </p>
<p>Connections to international terrorists? Ok, sure, so does the United States government, we negotiate with insurgents all the time. Does that make us terrorist allies?  </p>
<p>Saddam&#039;s primary motivator was power, not ideology. What little ideology he had was fiercely anti-Wahhabi, and pro authoritarian-socialist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Brutus</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/08/the-author-of-going-rogue-would-never-have-endorsed-rand-paul/#comment-56369</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Brutus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30605#comment-56369</guid>
		<description>Nonsense, Washington&#039;s address is particularly relevant in regards to Iraq. It has little to do with Afghanistan however, perhaps that&#039;s what you were shooting for.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nonsense, Washington&#039;s address is particularly relevant in regards to Iraq. It has little to do with Afghanistan however, perhaps that&#039;s what you were shooting for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Palin to Campaign for Rand Paul &#124; NewsReal Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/08/the-author-of-going-rogue-would-never-have-endorsed-rand-paul/#comment-55065</link>
		<dc:creator>Palin to Campaign for Rand Paul &#124; NewsReal Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30605#comment-55065</guid>
		<description>[...] More Here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More Here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barely A Blog &#187; The Fair Lady Endorses The Randian</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/08/the-author-of-going-rogue-would-never-have-endorsed-rand-paul/#comment-50843</link>
		<dc:creator>Barely A Blog &#187; The Fair Lady Endorses The Randian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30605#comment-50843</guid>
		<description>[...] bid for the Kentucky U.S. Senate seat. Neoconservatives are furious. David Horowitz&#8217;s new NewsReal blog offers an attempt at an analysis of the contradictions of a Palin endorsement of a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bid for the Kentucky U.S. Senate seat. Neoconservatives are furious. David Horowitz&#8217;s new NewsReal blog offers an attempt at an analysis of the contradictions of a Palin endorsement of a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Bluegrass &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Funny Thing Happened On the Way To The Republican Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/08/the-author-of-going-rogue-would-never-have-endorsed-rand-paul/#comment-50599</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Bluegrass &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Funny Thing Happened On the Way To The Republican Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30605#comment-50599</guid>
		<description>[...] David Horowitz went through point by point on how Rand Paul&#8217;s positions contradict those of Sarah Palin on an array of issues. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Horowitz went through point by point on how Rand Paul&#8217;s positions contradict those of Sarah Palin on an array of issues. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/08/the-author-of-going-rogue-would-never-have-endorsed-rand-paul/#comment-50431</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30605#comment-50431</guid>
		<description>Jeanette Pryor, sincerely, what are your thoughts on Ron Paul&#039;s statements about &quot;Just War,&quot; 
in this clip: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Dyyd4rcuZc&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Dyyd4rcuZc&lt;/a&gt;  
- there is an important segment at 4:55 - I know you disagree-- 
but I imagine you don&#039;t think he&#039;s insincere? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeanette Pryor, sincerely, what are your thoughts on Ron Paul&#39;s statements about &quot;Just War,&quot;<br />
in this clip: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Dyyd4rcuZc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Dyyd4rcuZc</a><br />
- there is an important segment at 4:55 &#8211; I know you disagree&#8211;<br />
but I imagine you don&#39;t think he&#39;s insincere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LucyQ</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/08/the-author-of-going-rogue-would-never-have-endorsed-rand-paul/#comment-50193</link>
		<dc:creator>LucyQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30605#comment-50193</guid>
		<description>That was a very good and interesting article. Thanks for posting it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a very good and interesting article. Thanks for posting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/08/the-author-of-going-rogue-would-never-have-endorsed-rand-paul/#comment-50252</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30605#comment-50252</guid>
		<description>Comparing Rand Paul to Michael Moore? The Neo-Cons have reached a desperate new low. After the rest of the country turned on the Iraq war and Republicans lost in &#039;06 and &#039;08, one would think the hawkish right would wisen up and realize that nobody is in line with their aggressive military policies. Rand Paul believes in the Constitution. Period. Anyone who doesn&#039;t agree with him doesn&#039;t believe in the rule of law.  
 
This sentence: 
 
&quot;Deviating from principled intellectualism will reduce the Tea Party to a gruesome mirror image of the eschatological, savior-seeking deplored in the Obama apotheosis.&quot; 
 
is hilarious. Palin and &quot;principled intellectualism?&quot; Palin is a pitchforker, pure and simple. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparing Rand Paul to Michael Moore? The Neo-Cons have reached a desperate new low. After the rest of the country turned on the Iraq war and Republicans lost in &#039;06 and &#039;08, one would think the hawkish right would wisen up and realize that nobody is in line with their aggressive military policies. Rand Paul believes in the Constitution. Period. Anyone who doesn&#039;t agree with him doesn&#039;t believe in the rule of law.  </p>
<p>This sentence: </p>
<p>&quot;Deviating from principled intellectualism will reduce the Tea Party to a gruesome mirror image of the eschatological, savior-seeking deplored in the Obama apotheosis.&quot; </p>
<p>is hilarious. Palin and &quot;principled intellectualism?&quot; Palin is a pitchforker, pure and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GDS</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/08/the-author-of-going-rogue-would-never-have-endorsed-rand-paul/#comment-50090</link>
		<dc:creator>GDS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=30605#comment-50090</guid>
		<description>&quot;Palin is cultured enough to support Obama&#039;s troop surge&quot;  
 
This is called a sardonic sentence. You miss the intended humour. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Palin is cultured enough to support Obama&#39;s troop surge&quot;  </p>
<p>This is called a sardonic sentence. You miss the intended humour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

