Comments on: Was Sarah Palin Snookered Into Endorsing a Stealth Anti-Israel Candidate?

By: Sela

Sela — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 18:25:28 +0000

The issue or Ron Paul's anti semitism has nothing to do with how much aid Israel is given compared to how much is given to the Arabs. There is just so much more to the story. Comparing the Israeli treatment of Gazans to that of a concentration camp. Recognizing the terrorist Hamas as a legit govt. Denying Israel's right to defend itself. Those are a few of the reasons.

By: Rookie Rand #2: No Citizenship for Children of Illegal Immigrants | NewsReal Blog

Fri, 28 May 2010 20:08:50 +0000

[...] with as great as he’s been at covering up his anti-American foreign policy views I really expected Rand to be a bit more politically saavy than the Old Man. Guess I was wrong. [...]

By: CheMan

CheMan — Thu, 20 May 2010 15:21:53 +0000

Unfortunately, we live in an age of McCarthyism where every criticism of anything Jewish (whether it be the crazy Jewish settlements, Israel's spying efforts in America or its atrocities in Lebanon and Gaza) must be subdued for fear of being called an "ANTI-SEMITE". Given how there are 200 million Arab Semites- this term makes no sense and is thrown around like the "Communist" label under the late Senator.

If anything we haven't been "Anti-Semitic" enough in that we don't debate things closely for fear of this over-represented minority (look at Hollywood, Wall St, Legal Profession, etc. and then tell me if i'm overstating the case). The fact that tens of millions of fanatical Christians (Palin's buddies) worship and serve a foreign nation is nothing to be proud of. Paul- like many others- is sick of the Jewish welfare state and how it is hurting US interests with the Islamic world and image globally. It is time to come out of the close and say so.

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 05 May 2010 12:05:51 +0000

David, don't be fooled, Palin is also a very stealth anti-Israel politician. Her agenda is to use people of Israel as fodder for realizing armageddon fantasies of right winger extremists like her, she opposes same sex marriage, abortion and inter racial marriages that seperate modern day Israel from her medieval neighbors. She is supporting wars only to get holy land ready as a landing strip for Jesus and subsequent mass bloodshed of the locals if they didn't convert and accept the savior. As infomed as you apear otherwise, did you really not know stealth agenda of likes of her?

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 05 May 2010 07:53:45 +0000

Does Palin believe in return of Jesus and cleansing of holy land?

By: Frank Gaffney Needs Our Support In an Important Task: Getting the Right Back on Track in the Battle with Islamofascism | NewsReal Blog

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:45:07 +0000

[...] A: Conservative icon Sarah Palin endorses Rand Paul for one of Kentucky’s Senate seats. The son of notorious non-interventionist Congressman Ron [...]

By: It Was Nice While It Lasted: Self-Appointed Conservative Gatekeepers Begin Their Purge « Conservative Policy News

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:36:44 +0000

[...] Sarah Palin and suggesting in another that her political career may be over. Apparently, they were infuriated that Gov. Palin endorsed Rand Paul in the Republican primary for Kentucky U.S. Senate. Writers at [...]

By: Andrew Hoffman

Andrew Hoffman — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:38:05 +0000

I have nothing against Israel. I have nothing against Iran either. I don’t think we should be involved in either country in any respect. People constantly worried about Israel tend to forget they have about 300 high tech nukes lying around and a trigger finger that no one in the middle east wants to test. Let them take care of themselves.

If you call someone an anti-semite just because they disagree with you, then the term anti-semite will lose all meaning. That has already happened to a large extent.

I support Rand Paul, but I wish he was less of a panderer to the warmongering Republicans in Kentucky. No one matches up to Ron Paul.

By: Anon

Anon — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:26:12 +0000

Actually, those newsletters came out 20 some years ago. They got rehashed during that campaign by James Kirchich as a dirty political ploy, who claimed Ron Paul spoke in "racist code" on Tucker Carson's show. So, no. That article came out after the newsletters. Nice try, sir. But go ahead and believe what some self-important, wet behind the ears, yellow journalist, looking to score some points and fame, rather then the former Texas NAACP President, now Director, Nelson Linder, who defended Ron Paul. I doubt you believe that Director Linder is a self-hating black man, right? Or, maybe this is just projection on your part and the one who's really racist is you?

To continue to call Ron Paul racist for a resolved issue over 20 years ago is to perpetuate a conspiracy, shows ignorance of history (which is proof in your statement), and displays the utter intellectual bankruptcy of a person who decides to attack a viewed opponent at any means necessary (libel, slander, ad hominems, fallacies, etc). Seriously, this is old. The horse is dead already, quit beating it, unless you're in to that kind of thing. If so, I'd suggest moving to Enumclaw.

By: ashamed

ashamed — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 04:37:28 +0000

This is a bullshit.

As a Jew and an Israeli, I am ashamed of you for your ignorant attack on the Pauls.

Ron Paul is the biggest friend of Israel in he house. He wants his beast to starve our beast. We in Israel do not want the US gov involved in our bloated military budget with their military aid.

Shame on you.

By: poq

poq — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:50:12 +0000

“the policies of Ron Paul would result in the destruction of Israel and the empowerment of Islamic Nazis. ”

That’s quite the crystal ball you have there. Any picks for the superbowl? lotto?

The fact is you don’t know what Paul’s policies would result in. They very well could lead to peace in the middle east. What we do know is what our current policy will result in because it has been tragically repeating for the last 60 years! I think it’s about time we reconsider our foreign policy and I believe the Paul’s are on to something.

By: DavidSwindle

DavidSwindle — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:09:26 +0000

I was very gentle with Sarah.