It’s Official – Tony Blair A Murderer And A Liar – England Surrendering To Islam
It’s official. Tony Blair (pictured above as Hitler in the British paper The Daily Mail), former Prime Minister of the once-great nation of the United Kingdom, has been branded a liar and a murderer by current Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s Chilcot Inquiry, and by a British national press that has lost its collective senses. The leftist British government’s fear of Muslim mass violence as retaliation for resisting England’s ongoing Islamization is now greater than the fear of incremental surrender to the Forces of Islam, and what that surrender will eventually bring to the English people – Sharia.
Blair testified eloquently and convincingly Friday, reiterating that he believes that toppling Saddam Hussein was the correct course of action. The members of Inquiry were not of a mind to be swayed by his arguments and Chilcot himself held out two opportunities for Blair to express remorse. Courageously, Blair stuck to his guns and refused to acquiesce.
With video included of parts of Blair’s testimony, The TimesUK Online story is here:
“Tony Blair was branded a murderer and liar last night after he ended his historic appearance before the Iraq inquiry with a blank refusal to voice regrets over toppling Saddam Hussein.
After six hours in which the Chilcot inquiry team had largely failed to breach his defences, the former Prime Minister brought trouble on himself by failing to show the contrition that his critics wanted.
Mr Blair, who gave a fluent, assured performance, refused to apologise for going to war, said that he would do the same again, and then warned that today’s leaders might have to take similar action to disarm Iran…”
This story is far from finished and it bears close watching here in America. Is Mr. Blair headed for a War crimes trial in The Netherlands for leading The UK into an “illegal” war? That is a specialty of the International Criminal Court (ICC), to which many on the Left in the United States want to cede and surrender our national judicial authority.
This month President Obama very quietly made the offices and records of Interpol sovereign and exempt from American law enforcement by amending Ronald Reagan’s Executive Order 12425. Interpol is the investigative arm of the ICC. Why would he do that and then refuse to discuss it with reporters?
And a more troubling question arises: If, in the worst case, Mr. Blair becomes a defendant at The Hague, what does that mean for President Bush and Vice President Cheney? Keep your eye on this story, ladies and gentlemen. Do not believe for a second that something like this cannot happen here.
There are far too many examples of Obama engaging in anti-american policy, this is one that moves under the radar screen, Ask your congressperson-What is the end game?
Left wing historical revisionists are very active in England these days. The British citizens need an equivalent of DiscoverTheNetworks in England !
You don't get anyone more anti-Islam than me, but I detest Tony Blair.
Every conflict we have been in is "illegal", such as bombing Serbia. That aspect is a total irrelevence.
There'll be no war-crimes trial.
What nobody in authority is asking is, if Al-Qaeda and the Taliban practice such a perverse form of Islam, then why isn't every Muslim country in the world fighting them in the name of Islam, in order to install the "correct" version?
The Saudis and Yemen are fighting Al-Qaeda and the Pakistanis are fighting the Taliban. Jordan is fighting both and Egypt is fighting the Muslim Brotherhood.
The only places I know of where religious extremists (looking forwards to blowing up the entire world amongst other things) are respectable and not being fought are the US and Israel.
Tony Blair professed to having the Koran by his bed and described it as "progressive" if I'm not mistaken. He and Bush should have forced the Islamic leaders to show just how "progressive" Islam is by martyring their young people instead of us using ours. Pakistan is supposedly fighting the Taliban (which originated in Pakistan), but is simultaneously harbouring Al-Qaeda.
At the very least Saudi Arabia and all the other Muslim oil-rich countries should be paying for the war. Instead they are financing the Islamisation of the West and for Muslims to kill our young people in Iraq and Afghanistan.
We are in a war with Islam (that is Muslims) and we should conduct ourselves as if we are in a war.
Blair and Bush are guilty of not confronting Muslims and Islamisation. Americans should beware becoming complacent about Islamisation in America. From where we are looking in Europe, the USA is sinking faster than us. Both the American Constitution and the EU Constitreaty have 'freedom of religion' enshrined.
That clause/amendment needs removing from both documents otherwise they both permit sharia law with its stoning of women etc.
Dear Stephen,
I view Blair and Bush as two world-leaders who were entirely ignorant of Muslim Doctrine as the basis for this War we are fighting. The depths of their misunderstanding of Islam defies description. I am sickened, however, at the caving in by Britain to Islam and the pillorying of a Prime Minister who at least had the courage to send British Troops to fight alongside our own after 9/11.
He deserves to be remembered as one who was without a shred of knowledge about Islam and jihad. He does not deserve this.
And it remains to be seen what is to become of him. I don't know what that will be. I do know what the Left wants to do with him.
Best,
JW
The infidel does not get to dicate to Muslims what Islam is and nation building was a huge mistake.
Hi Mr. Gash,
Tony Blair did say that about the Koran, and we cannot defeat an enemy if we cannot even name it.
Religions were invented by men to address mortality, to comfort those left behind after the deceased no longer walks among them. A true religion does not command its practitioners to actively die in its name (i.e to follow the deceased) due to the problem of societal extinction. Since Islam does command suicidal sacrifice with infidel homicide, it is a flawed religion and should be rejected on the grounds that it is a homicidal ideology to non-Muslims. An ideology that should be soundly rejected by freedom loving non-Muslim societies that value life more than death.
Hello, Bill. I agree with you, mostly. But what would happen to any of us for standing on a street corner in a Muslim state and saying aloud what you just wrote here. The Brits, and many Americans, did not see what's coming down the path by giving in to Muslim demands and allowing massive Islamic immigration. Islam does not compromise or assimilate in a host state, does it. It takes over.
Best, and thanks for reading my post.
JW
It’s official. Tony Blair (pictured above as Hitler in the British paper The Daily Mail)
Errrmmmm, isn't that the same Daily Mail which fawned over Hitler and Mussolini back in the 1930s and told us that we needed a leader like them?
England is done. It's just done.
Who cares?
A couple of years ago the Archbishop of Canterbury admonished that England should start incorporating Sharia law into its Civil law. What England needs is another Winston Churchill. England is well on its way to becoming another part of Eurabia. Most of the western european nations have historically had more of a willingness to roll over for tyrants who come down the pike than stand up to them. In that they resemble leftists and libertarians in this country. A mixed combobulation of America haters and cowards.
Indeed, VN vet. There are already Sharia courts operating in the UK. I'm afraid at this point that a Winston Churchill would be imprisoned over there in very short order for inciting hatred or some such charge as Geert Wilders faces in The Netherlands.
Which brings me to the U.S.A. Who will lead us through this?
Thanks so much for reading along and thank you for your service.
Best regards,
JW
This is a very troubling development and I see a similiar agenda happening here at breakneck speed. Mr Obama, along with the rest of the progressives have used a very successful tactic and that is "continue to bash Bush & Cheney". Since Mr Bush has refused to answer his critics for these many years, he has allowed BULLIES to define him. He is still on that track, sad to say. And since it works, they keep it up. I believe the reason for criminalizing all enemy combatants is so Bush and Cheny will be demonized and "exposed" by the left and world opinion will marginalize the right. Same with the Interpol changes. The left has so many "tricks up their sleeves" it's hard for the right to keep up with exposing them. I am praying these radicals are waking up the country and will be voted out enmasse come November and in 2012.
Dear Kris,
Thanks for reading and taking the time to make a comment. I had the same thoughts you expressed here as Obama piled executive action after action onto the heap, faster than I could keep up with him.
We shall have to see what happens now, both overseas and here, with the Left yelling for prosecutions of them who defended us. There are soldiers sitting in prison for killings in the Iraq war zone. And terrorists who killed Americans have been released from prison.
Chin up.
Best, JW
Presently and since what is left of the UK is busily conspiring to harm our very existence in our land, one may care less about what is happening to the Brutish…
Yet, there are concerns. Islam would take a large nuclear complex and corresponding nuclear weapons if they control that island. It is not only Harrod's at stake but also the Antartic operations as well as other British occupied Lands.
Blair is at best uninteresting to us, but the process in place should cause US residents to ponder about the US falling as much. Mr. Saetoro-Obama is doing everything possible to follow Islamic designs.
This all falls in line with what I've read in "Eurabia" by Bat Ye'or and I'm afraid that if we don't wake up soon we will find ourselves in the same mess. It seems like we are in for a great battle and I'm afraid we just don't have the will or intelligence to fight it.
Dear Margaret,
Congrats for reading Eurabia. I've had to take it in pieces, I find it so depressing. It's about time for me to pick it back up and finish.
Best,
JW
Wow, the muslims did what Hitler couldn't. They brought Britain to it's knees and put it's head in the stock. Next on the news, Islam shall cut off the head of the isles.
I'm going to be highly ANGRY if, sometime in the future, America is called upon to once again go to Europe and save those people from their own stupidity. If these morons have the gall to turn themselves over to these barbarians, then they deserve to be slaves. All the better that we not help them after the way many of them have turned on us.
Have any of you heard of the EuroMed agreement signed recently? The EU wants to merge with the Mediterranean African states into one big superunion? They plan to open the floodgates of Islamic immigration even more over the next decade. Idiots.
I don't dispute what you say, but right now here in the U.S. we are in danger of the same thing. The democ-rats are in bed with CAIR, a terror organization. The dems did everything they could to lose the terror war in Iraq. They did everything they could to cause the U.S. to pull out of Iraq. Which would have had the same devastating effect that pulling out of Viet Nam prematurely had in Southeast Asia, to wit: 2.5 million souls murdered by the communists. The numbers in the middle east would possibly have made that number pale. The muslims are using our courts and other of our free institutions against us. They, like the democ-rats are trying desperately to undermine our free speech rights.
Try the book: 'America Alone', by Mark Steyn
I was remiss in not pointing out that it was the democ-rats/leftists/communists who worked tirelessly for our early withdrawal from Viet Nam. All of it, the demonstrations, etc., funded btw, we now know from declassified files and declassified KGB files, by the Soviet Union. Makes one wonder if Dem Senators Fullbright and Symington, who provided a Senate venue for John F'n sKerry to testify (lie) back in 1971 was bankrolled by the KGB. Naw, the American taxpayer most likely was the victim of that sham.
Where do all these moslems get off calling everyone they don't like Hitler or Nazis. I thought moslems and Nazis were thick as thieves during WWII. Also, since Mein Kampf is the second biggest selling book after the unHoly Koran in the Islamic world, I can only guess they use 'Hitler' or 'Nazi' as a term of respect and admiration.
Why, Alex, I detest the idea of fascism. Actually David Horowitz is pretty smart, and a very good speaker. And I'm sorry you don't like my writing, but do come back and read some more.
Best,
JW
I'm taking my family somewhere else than the British muslim Isles this spring.
I as an Indian, who should I go to complain to try Mr. Jinnah for aggression against India by invading the State of Jammu and Kashmir, blatantly and complicitely causing the worst holocaust even after the one suffered just prior to that during the partition of India/Pakistan in August 1947? It may be a far complicated matter, of the massacre related to the actual partition in Agust 1947. But the one inflicted in October 1947 by the rapacious, lier and profane Jinnah was not at all desired. Though he is no more, but the trail of legacy left behind by him is still hound-ing the people in Kashmir and mainland India; for no fault of them even in the slightest.
contd…..
contd from previous note….
This is why, I call the word "HUMANITY" a farse in the anthropological context of so-called "Human" history. There are hardly 'Humans', but only 'Hunted Men/Women'. Churchill said,"History is written by the Victors". A shameless and an egoistic statement. Contrast it with Abraham Lincoln's statement,"As I can not be a Slave, so I can not be a Master". Sir Winston Churchill lived and said it long after Abraham Lincoln had departed.
We rejoice in such statements as a rhetoric to boost our emotional literary and communicative skills. But how much relevance does it have is another matter.