I wish that our President would actually take the time to read your letter, but I do not think he would understand nor would he even make an attempt to understand what you have written. I come from a long line of military veterans, ours is a military family. My grandfather flew B-17's and took 4 tours in them even though he could have rotated stateside after the first tour. My Dad was in the 1st Cav. and I was and Military Intelligence officer. So, like you, I am stunned and amazed by what our Commander and Chief is up to. I have often thought "Is this why I played roulette with my life?". I believe that what you, my grandfather and so many others have done has kept us free. As a student of history, I am frightened by the thought of what this world would have looked like if people like you had not stepped up.

While I may feel like we our losing, I believe that the American people will wake up and stop this man and his little band of progressives. The American people are waking up and boy are they not happy. So if you should read this post, which was made two weeks after yours, I would implore you to send a copy of this letter by email and by post to the President. I would ask you to send it to every Congressman and Senator who you believe would read it. You have been gifted with a clarity of thought gained through those 95 years of life. Someone is bound to actually listen, hey it could happen.

In closing I would like to say that I am happy to know there are people like you who are still out there. Please believe that there are younger people that are ready to do all we can to make sure your county does outlive you and will outlive us.

Thank you for your time,

David M. Nelson

I thank you for reading my posting and for your service to our country. My father, who died in 1995, served during WWII in the CBI Theatre under General Joseph "Vinegar Joe" Stillwell.

I echo many of your sentiments and hope you will continue to read and comment.

Very best wishes,

John L. Work

Thank you, sir, for reading my posting and for taking your time to comment. I think you misread or misunderstood what I wrote. You are quite correct in asserting that Interpol does not YET have extra-Constitutional arrest powers and I did not assert that it does. However Interpol's offices and documents are now exempt from search and seizure under the guidelines of the Fourth Amendment by our law enforcement agencies, by virtue of Obama amending Reagan's original executive order. Any documents given to Interpol by our own government officials for storage or concealment are therefore also exempt from lawful search and public inspection.

Reagan did not grant Interpol that protection for a very good reason. It is no secret that the left wing in this nation is very anxious to assign and cede to the International Criminal Court supremacy over our own Courts. This is but one more small step toward a World Government. It is a step that the White House took very quietly and, ominously has refused to discuss with reporters.

Very best wishes,

John L. Work

My name is Harold Estes, approaching 95 on December 13 of this year. People meeting me for the first time don't believe my age because I remain wrinkle free and pretty much mentally alert.

I enlisted in the U.S. Navy in 1934 and served proudly before, during and after WW II retiring as a Master Chief Bos'n Mate. Now I live in a "rest home" located on the western end of Pearl Harbor, allowing me to keep alive the memories of 23 years of service to my country.

One of the benefits of my age, perhaps the only one, is to speak my mind, blunt and direct even to the head man.

So here goes.

I am amazed, angry and determined not to see my country die before I do, but you seem hell bent not to grant me that wish.

I can't figure out what country you are the president of. You fly around the world telling our friends and enemies despicable lies like:

"We're no longer a Christian nation"

"America is arrogant" – (Your wife even announced to the world, "America is mean- spirited." Please tell her to try preaching that nonsense to 23 generations of our dead buried all over the globe who died for no other reason than to free a lot of strangers from tyranny and hopelessness.)

I'd say shame on the both of you, but I don't think you like America, nor do I see an ounce of gratefulness in anything you do, for the obvious gifts this country has given you. To be without shame or gratefulness is a dangerous thing for a man sitting in the White House.

After 9/11 you said, "America hasn't lived up to her ideals."

Which ones did you mean?

Was it the notion of personal liberty that 11,000 farmers and shopkeepers died for to win independence from the British?

Or maybe the ideal that no man should be a slave to another man, that 500,000 men died for in the Civil War?

I hope you didn't mean the ideal 470,000 fathers, brothers, husbands, and a lot of fellas I knew personally died for in WWII, because we felt real strongly about not letting any nation push us around, because we stand for freedom.

I don't think you mean the ideal that says equality is better than discrimination. You know the one that a whole lot of white people understood when they helped to get you elected.

Take a little advice from a very old geezer, young man.

Shape up and start acting like an American. If you don't, I'll do what I can to see you get shipped out of that fancy rental on Pennsylvania Avenue . You were elected to lead not to bow, apologize and kiss the hands of murderers and corrupt leaders who still treat their people like slaves.

And just who do you think you are telling the American people not to jump to conclusions and condemn that Muslim major who killed 13 of his fellow soldiers and wounded dozens more. You mean you don't want us to do what you did when that white cop used force to subdue that black college professor in Massachusetts, who was putting up a fight?

You don't mind offending the police calling them stupid but you don't want us to offend Muslim fanatics by calling them what they are, terrorists.

One more thing. I realize you never served in the military and never had to defend your country with your life, but you're the Commander-in-Chief now, son. Do your job. When your battle-hardened field General asks you for 40,000 more troops to complete the mission, give them to him.

But if you're not in this fight to win, then get out. The life of one American soldier is not worth the best political strategy you're thinking of.

You could be our greatest president because you face the greatest challenge ever presented to any president.

You're not going to restore American greatness by bringing back our bloated economy. That's not our greatest threat. Losing the heart and soul of who we are as Americans is our big fight now.

And I sure as hell don't want to think my president is the enemy in this final battle.

Sincerely,

Harold B. Estes

This post was mentioned on Twitter by brandootr: Obama Unleashes International Cops On The United States http://bit.ly/7Jazh8 #tcot #teaparty #912 #interpol…

First, the USSC decided in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) that executive orders don’t have the impact of law. This should be evident to anyone who reads Section 1 of Article I; Congress has all legislative powers. So regardless what constitutional “experts” like “King” Obama have been indoctrinated to “think” about executive orders, Obama doesn’t have the power to force international police on US citizens via executive orders that he thinks are laws.

And if you think that Congress has the power to use an international police force to limit our constitutional rights, you might want to reconsider. Although I haven’t seen the word treaty concerning Obama’s international police force, consider the following. Regardless that the President and Senate have the power to negotiate treaties, keep in mind that the federal government has no powers outside those expressly delegated to it by the Constitution, particularly those listed in Section 8 of Article I, to negotiate treaties; the Founding States made the 10th A. to reserve the lion’s share of government power to serve the people to the states, not the Oval Office and Congress.

What all this means, IMO, is that Obama and the Senate cannot use their power to negotiate treaties as a back door to forcing US citizens to do things that the federal government has no constitutional authority to do anyway. And if you don’t believe me then perhaps you’ll believe a respected constitutional expert.

“Surely the President and Senate cannot do by treaty what the whole government is interdicted from doing in any way.” –Thomas Jefferson: Parliamentary Manual, 1800.

Again, Obama and Congress cannot use executive orders or treaties as loopholes to water down our constitutional rights.

Also, 2nd A. advocates might find this interesting. I have yet to find any constitutional statute which expressly delegates power to Congress to regulate civilian firearms, with or without the 2nd Amendment; the 2nd A. is certainly not a delegation of such power.

And having briefly reviewed federal gun regulations for civilians, significant federal gun regulations seemingly didn’t appear in the books until the FDR administration. What is disturbing about FDR-period gun regulations is that the corrupt Congress was blatantly overstepping is constitutional limits on many aspects of everyday life anyway. So I question the constitutionality of federal gun regulations for civilians.

Finally, to be blunt, I don’t think that citizens would lose as much sleep over the unconstitutional shenanigans of Obama and Congress as much if they got themselves up to speed on the Constitution and its history. Citizens would at least have the satisfaction of knowing that Obama has likely been indoctrinated with politically correct interpretations of the Constitution and, other than acting out the socialistic fantasies that he’s been programmed to obey, simply doesn’t know what he’s doing.

The bottom line is that voters have a big mess to clean up in DC in 2010. Voters need to use the opportunity provided by the 2010 elections to destroy the phony powers associated with the Oval Office and Congress.