<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Sarah Palin a Birther? No, But the Left Wishes She Was</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/04/is-sarah-palin-a-birther-no-but-the-left-wishes-she-was/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/04/is-sarah-palin-a-birther-no-but-the-left-wishes-she-was/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:34:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The Odd Lies Of Sarah Palin XXXVI: &#8220;Which We Have Done&#8221; &#171; Sarah Palin Truth Squad</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/04/is-sarah-palin-a-birther-no-but-the-left-wishes-she-was/#comment-32376</link>
		<dc:creator>The Odd Lies Of Sarah Palin XXXVI: &#8220;Which We Have Done&#8221; &#171; Sarah Palin Truth Squad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 23:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=17253#comment-32376</guid>
		<description>[...] David Horowitz, excoriating Sullivan, fails to mention Palin&#8217;s lie. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Horowitz, excoriating Sullivan, fails to mention Palin&#8217;s lie. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/04/is-sarah-palin-a-birther-no-but-the-left-wishes-she-was/#comment-32317</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=17253#comment-32317</guid>
		<description>To David Swindle -- Umm . . . There are two separate issues here re: the so-called birther matter:  

(1) where one believes Obama was born; and 

(2) whether one believes, regardless of where Obama was born, that he was ever eligible to be the POTUS per the 3 requirements of that office set forth in Article II of the US Constitution.   

My view, after a lot of study -- which YOU, sir, have apparently not done -- is that most likely Obama was born in Hawaii but there are actual/real legal reasons to be uncertain . . .and  . . .

UNTIL SCOTUS rules otherwise, I do not believe that Obama is a &quot;natural born citizen&quot; of the US.  So, in reality, we do NOT KNOW YET if Obama is a NBC of the US b/c  SCOTUS would need to ADD Obama&#039;s citizenships status (born to one US Citizen and one foreign nation) to the long-recognized definition of NBC which is:  born on US soil/territory to 2 US Citizens.  

The latter definition is the ONLY definition of NBC that we KNOW is legally/constitutionally true.  ALL other possible definitions of NBC are speculative per the rulings of SCOTUS. 

There are only a handful of cases that deal with NBC and ALL are consistent with the definition that NBC = born on US soil/territory to 2 US citizens.  

BTW, &quot;conservative&quot; also includes a &quot;Strict Constructionists&quot; court -- that applies the law AS IT IS instead of how some may think it should be.  It IS conservative to demand that Article I of the US Constitution be enforced as intended, and written, by the Framers of the US Constitution . . .and we DO know what they intended in that provision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To David Swindle &#8212; Umm . . . There are two separate issues here re: the so-called birther matter:  </p>
<p>(1) where one believes Obama was born; and </p>
<p>(2) whether one believes, regardless of where Obama was born, that he was ever eligible to be the POTUS per the 3 requirements of that office set forth in Article II of the US Constitution.   </p>
<p>My view, after a lot of study &#8212; which YOU, sir, have apparently not done &#8212; is that most likely Obama was born in Hawaii but there are actual/real legal reasons to be uncertain . . .and  . . .</p>
<p>UNTIL SCOTUS rules otherwise, I do not believe that Obama is a &#8220;natural born citizen&#8221; of the US.  So, in reality, we do NOT KNOW YET if Obama is a NBC of the US b/c  SCOTUS would need to ADD Obama&#8217;s citizenships status (born to one US Citizen and one foreign nation) to the long-recognized definition of NBC which is:  born on US soil/territory to 2 US Citizens.  </p>
<p>The latter definition is the ONLY definition of NBC that we KNOW is legally/constitutionally true.  ALL other possible definitions of NBC are speculative per the rulings of SCOTUS. </p>
<p>There are only a handful of cases that deal with NBC and ALL are consistent with the definition that NBC = born on US soil/territory to 2 US citizens.  </p>
<p>BTW, &#8220;conservative&#8221; also includes a &#8220;Strict Constructionists&#8221; court &#8212; that applies the law AS IT IS instead of how some may think it should be.  It IS conservative to demand that Article I of the US Constitution be enforced as intended, and written, by the Framers of the US Constitution . . .and we DO know what they intended in that provision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/04/is-sarah-palin-a-birther-no-but-the-left-wishes-she-was/#comment-32313</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=17253#comment-32313</guid>
		<description>RE: the Birther matter: This is a fairly complex LEGAL matter. 

Itâ€™s essentially irrelevant whether Obama is a US Citizen. He is, and would be, even if born in Kenya. That is not the question. 

The question is whether he is a NATURAL Born Citizen of the US per Article II of the US Constitution. Based on all the SCOTUS case law we have that deals with NBC, the answer is NO. 

There are many different ways one can attain US Citizenship: via statute, 14th Amendment, â€œnaturallyâ€=no other citizenship is possible, ie., born to 2 US Citizen parents on US soil/territory. If an illegal alien manages to cross the US border and deliver her child on US soil, 3 minutes after illegally entering the US, then the child IS a US Citizen but would NOT be a NBC of the US and thus eligible to be the POTUS and Commander-in-Chief of the US Armed Forces. 

I donâ€™t know what GAME you (and many others) are playing but itâ€™s OBVIOUS that Obama has SERIOUS Article II eligibility issues. 

The NBC requirement in Article II is a NATIONAL SECURITY PROTECTION. Obama is a â€œcitizen of the worldâ€  â€” literally â€” and heâ€™s proving it as POTUS. Obama was born a DUAL-citizen â€” a citizen of the US and a FOREIGN nation (GB),  Then Obama was a Tri-Citizne (US, GB, Kenya) and it&#039;s quite likely (based on school records) that Obama was (and possibly is still) a citizen of Indonesia too.  We don&#039;t even know the answer to whether Obama was ever, and still is, legally, a citizen of Indonesia.  WHY don&#039;t we know the answer?  He&#039;s never asked to answer that obviously serious question.  Why not?  It&#039;s obviously a relevant question for a mere candidate for the office of POTUS to be asked! 

THIS is the issue -- the fact of multiple-citizenships held by the sitting POTUS -- and itâ€™s one whopper of a serious matter.  . .with long-term consequences for Executive Branch of the US Govt as well as the US Armed Forces.    We&#039;ve actually got a Commander-in-Chief of the US Armed forces, DURING WAR, who is, and has been, a Citizen of at least TWO foreign countries and likely three . . .and THAT is not a problem for anyone? 

Quite frankly, only an idiot canâ€™t see how serious this is. 

RE:  Global Warming:  amazingly, a FEW SCIENTISTS have managed to successfully conspire to convince the WORLD that global warming is caused by man . . .and that anyone who disagrees is a nut-case. Well, surprise, these global warming conspiracists REALLY DID pull if off â€” even at a world-wide level. So, donâ€™t bull-sâ€“ me and tell me that Obama couldnâ€™t pull-off an ATTACK on the US Constitution.  He could and did.  

What Obama did was to VIOLATE, directly, the only known and accepted definition of &quot;natural born citizen&quot; -- one of just 3 requirements to hold the office of POTUS and C-in-C.  Obama challenged the ENFORCEABLITY of an Article of the Constitution . . .and so far, he&#039;s WINNING.   

If a few scientists can conspire together with political statists to MAKE the world believe that Global Warming is caused by man, then OF COURSE Obama can manipulate the &quot;holes&quot; in the enforceability mechanism of the US Constitution -- which he DID do -- with the assistance of the DNC and HI DoH.

Again, Obama is a US Citizen (through his mother -- 14th Amendment) regardless of where he was born -- be it the US (fine) or Kenya or the Soviet Union, okay . . .but he&#039;s NOT a NBC which he MUST be to be the POTUS.   Interestingly, Constitutionally, a CANDIDATE for POTUS doesn&#039;t have to be a NBC but rather only a NBC can BE the POTUS.  That&#039;s one &quot;holes&quot; in Article II. . .so in reality, Obama only had to get through ONE election step (constitutionally) . . .and he did. 

And, that&#039;s WHY Justice Roberts screwed-up the Oath of Office to Obama and he specifically excluded the word: &quot;FAITHFULLY&quot; execute . . .&quot; b/c he already knew that Obama would not &quot;faithfully&quot; execute the office b/c he&#039;d ALREADY violated Article II.  

The only question in my mind is HOW LONG is this going to be tolerated. Obama has SET PRECEDENT for all future POTUS&#039;s.  Now, pretty much any Joe -- including the child of an illegal alien merely born on US soil -- can become the President of the United States and C-in-C of THE most powerful fighting force in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: the Birther matter: This is a fairly complex LEGAL matter. </p>
<p>Itâ€™s essentially irrelevant whether Obama is a US Citizen. He is, and would be, even if born in Kenya. That is not the question. </p>
<p>The question is whether he is a NATURAL Born Citizen of the US per Article II of the US Constitution. Based on all the SCOTUS case law we have that deals with NBC, the answer is NO. </p>
<p>There are many different ways one can attain US Citizenship: via statute, 14th Amendment, â€œnaturallyâ€=no other citizenship is possible, ie., born to 2 US Citizen parents on US soil/territory. If an illegal alien manages to cross the US border and deliver her child on US soil, 3 minutes after illegally entering the US, then the child IS a US Citizen but would NOT be a NBC of the US and thus eligible to be the POTUS and Commander-in-Chief of the US Armed Forces. </p>
<p>I donâ€™t know what GAME you (and many others) are playing but itâ€™s OBVIOUS that Obama has SERIOUS Article II eligibility issues. </p>
<p>The NBC requirement in Article II is a NATIONAL SECURITY PROTECTION. Obama is a â€œcitizen of the worldâ€  â€” literally â€” and heâ€™s proving it as POTUS. Obama was born a DUAL-citizen â€” a citizen of the US and a FOREIGN nation (GB),  Then Obama was a Tri-Citizne (US, GB, Kenya) and it&#8217;s quite likely (based on school records) that Obama was (and possibly is still) a citizen of Indonesia too.  We don&#8217;t even know the answer to whether Obama was ever, and still is, legally, a citizen of Indonesia.  WHY don&#8217;t we know the answer?  He&#8217;s never asked to answer that obviously serious question.  Why not?  It&#8217;s obviously a relevant question for a mere candidate for the office of POTUS to be asked! </p>
<p>THIS is the issue &#8212; the fact of multiple-citizenships held by the sitting POTUS &#8212; and itâ€™s one whopper of a serious matter.  . .with long-term consequences for Executive Branch of the US Govt as well as the US Armed Forces.    We&#8217;ve actually got a Commander-in-Chief of the US Armed forces, DURING WAR, who is, and has been, a Citizen of at least TWO foreign countries and likely three . . .and THAT is not a problem for anyone? </p>
<p>Quite frankly, only an idiot canâ€™t see how serious this is. </p>
<p>RE:  Global Warming:  amazingly, a FEW SCIENTISTS have managed to successfully conspire to convince the WORLD that global warming is caused by man . . .and that anyone who disagrees is a nut-case. Well, surprise, these global warming conspiracists REALLY DID pull if off â€” even at a world-wide level. So, donâ€™t bull-sâ€“ me and tell me that Obama couldnâ€™t pull-off an ATTACK on the US Constitution.  He could and did.  </p>
<p>What Obama did was to VIOLATE, directly, the only known and accepted definition of &#8220;natural born citizen&#8221; &#8212; one of just 3 requirements to hold the office of POTUS and C-in-C.  Obama challenged the ENFORCEABLITY of an Article of the Constitution . . .and so far, he&#8217;s WINNING.   </p>
<p>If a few scientists can conspire together with political statists to MAKE the world believe that Global Warming is caused by man, then OF COURSE Obama can manipulate the &#8220;holes&#8221; in the enforceability mechanism of the US Constitution &#8212; which he DID do &#8212; with the assistance of the DNC and HI DoH.</p>
<p>Again, Obama is a US Citizen (through his mother &#8212; 14th Amendment) regardless of where he was born &#8212; be it the US (fine) or Kenya or the Soviet Union, okay . . .but he&#8217;s NOT a NBC which he MUST be to be the POTUS.   Interestingly, Constitutionally, a CANDIDATE for POTUS doesn&#8217;t have to be a NBC but rather only a NBC can BE the POTUS.  That&#8217;s one &#8220;holes&#8221; in Article II. . .so in reality, Obama only had to get through ONE election step (constitutionally) . . .and he did. </p>
<p>And, that&#8217;s WHY Justice Roberts screwed-up the Oath of Office to Obama and he specifically excluded the word: &#8220;FAITHFULLY&#8221; execute . . .&#8221; b/c he already knew that Obama would not &#8220;faithfully&#8221; execute the office b/c he&#8217;d ALREADY violated Article II.  </p>
<p>The only question in my mind is HOW LONG is this going to be tolerated. Obama has SET PRECEDENT for all future POTUS&#8217;s.  Now, pretty much any Joe &#8212; including the child of an illegal alien merely born on US soil &#8212; can become the President of the United States and C-in-C of THE most powerful fighting force in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2bluestarmom</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/04/is-sarah-palin-a-birther-no-but-the-left-wishes-she-was/#comment-32226</link>
		<dc:creator>2bluestarmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=17253#comment-32226</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t see anything racial here at all! And frankly am getting sick of hearing the damn race card crap being used!

Because she&#039;s not black, or I&#039;m not black or brown or purple we can&#039;t speak?!

This is getting ridiculous and I doubt very seriously &quot;blackrepubican&quot; if you are black or republican!

And further more, who ever wrote this article and saying that Sarah&#039;s baby&#039;s birth certificate should be pursued is ludicrous!

What kind of idiots are you? 

Her baby is not running for the damn POTUS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t see anything racial here at all! And frankly am getting sick of hearing the damn race card crap being used!</p>
<p>Because she&#8217;s not black, or I&#8217;m not black or brown or purple we can&#8217;t speak?!</p>
<p>This is getting ridiculous and I doubt very seriously &#8220;blackrepubican&#8221; if you are black or republican!</p>
<p>And further more, who ever wrote this article and saying that Sarah&#8217;s baby&#8217;s birth certificate should be pursued is ludicrous!</p>
<p>What kind of idiots are you? </p>
<p>Her baby is not running for the damn POTUS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia Thornburg</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/04/is-sarah-palin-a-birther-no-but-the-left-wishes-she-was/#comment-32186</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia Thornburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=17253#comment-32186</guid>
		<description>Where are the ratings? Put them back, please. I can understand that you are still working out the kinks ie: double postings, but do put the comments&#039; ratings back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are the ratings? Put them back, please. I can understand that you are still working out the kinks ie: double postings, but do put the comments&#8217; ratings back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/04/is-sarah-palin-a-birther-no-but-the-left-wishes-she-was/#comment-32179</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=17253#comment-32179</guid>
		<description>I really can&#039;t believe the comments on this post! Palin is a racist? Where the heck did that come from? I read the original post and quote and I didn&#039;t think Palin mis-spoke. Why shouldn&#039;t the electorate know everything about a presidential candidate when the rules for becoming president are clear, such as where he or she was born (a rule) and what he or she did in university. He/She is running for the highest office of the greatest country on earth, for God&#039;s sake! People in this position, as well as, a couple of lower positions should be subject to ultra vetting in my mind. I, for one, will not obsess over The One&#039;s birth certificate but, I think it&#039;s a valid question for those who wish to. If a valid certificate is not produced it just opens him up to the conjecture noted above. I can&#039;t understand why he would want questions like this to fester and poison a segment of the electorate.
I find it more troubling for him not to release his university papers. What he thinks is more important than where he was born!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really can&#8217;t believe the comments on this post! Palin is a racist? Where the heck did that come from? I read the original post and quote and I didn&#8217;t think Palin mis-spoke. Why shouldn&#8217;t the electorate know everything about a presidential candidate when the rules for becoming president are clear, such as where he or she was born (a rule) and what he or she did in university. He/She is running for the highest office of the greatest country on earth, for God&#8217;s sake! People in this position, as well as, a couple of lower positions should be subject to ultra vetting in my mind. I, for one, will not obsess over The One&#8217;s birth certificate but, I think it&#8217;s a valid question for those who wish to. If a valid certificate is not produced it just opens him up to the conjecture noted above. I can&#8217;t understand why he would want questions like this to fester and poison a segment of the electorate.<br />
I find it more troubling for him not to release his university papers. What he thinks is more important than where he was born!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Bob Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/04/is-sarah-palin-a-birther-no-but-the-left-wishes-she-was/#comment-32168</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Bob Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=17253#comment-32168</guid>
		<description>Amazing how many comments about birtherism but hardly anyone addressing the actual question posed on Sullivan&#039;s blog: when did Sarah Palin release Trig&#039;s birth certificate and, if she didn&#039;t, why did she say she did? If she simply misspoke then, from her statement,  it seems reasonable to conjecture that she&#039;s willing to release the certificate. So why, given the terribly biased, elite liberal media that insist on hounding her, aren&#039;t there any mainstream reporters following up on this? Isn&#039;t that what a biased, elite liberal media would do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing how many comments about birtherism but hardly anyone addressing the actual question posed on Sullivan&#8217;s blog: when did Sarah Palin release Trig&#8217;s birth certificate and, if she didn&#8217;t, why did she say she did? If she simply misspoke then, from her statement,  it seems reasonable to conjecture that she&#8217;s willing to release the certificate. So why, given the terribly biased, elite liberal media that insist on hounding her, aren&#8217;t there any mainstream reporters following up on this? Isn&#8217;t that what a biased, elite liberal media would do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Redman</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/04/is-sarah-palin-a-birther-no-but-the-left-wishes-she-was/#comment-32121</link>
		<dc:creator>John Redman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=17253#comment-32121</guid>
		<description>Screw what the left thinks or says. The object is to defeat them, not argue with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screw what the left thinks or says. The object is to defeat them, not argue with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane comeback</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/04/is-sarah-palin-a-birther-no-but-the-left-wishes-she-was/#comment-32120</link>
		<dc:creator>shane comeback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=17253#comment-32120</guid>
		<description>Someone has fallen asleep at the switch in site maintenance today. Oh well it&#039;s Sunday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone has fallen asleep at the switch in site maintenance today. Oh well it&#8217;s Sunday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lizblaine</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/04/is-sarah-palin-a-birther-no-but-the-left-wishes-she-was/#comment-31636</link>
		<dc:creator>lizblaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=17253#comment-31636</guid>
		<description>Well, isn&#039;t that special...the birthers are on the offensive. They&#039;ve had ample time to produce proof supporting their accusations, yet continue to denegrate the Conservative movement by their endless conspiratorial theories about President Obama&#039;s citizenship status. Perhaps Alex Jones will devise a new conspiracy theory they can follow for the next three years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, isn&#8217;t that special&#8230;the birthers are on the offensive. They&#8217;ve had ample time to produce proof supporting their accusations, yet continue to denegrate the Conservative movement by their endless conspiratorial theories about President Obama&#8217;s citizenship status. Perhaps Alex Jones will devise a new conspiracy theory they can follow for the next three years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustSayin</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/04/is-sarah-palin-a-birther-no-but-the-left-wishes-she-was/#comment-31635</link>
		<dc:creator>JustSayin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=17253#comment-31635</guid>
		<description>But what about the LIE?  When, where did she provide all that?  It was a lie. Make it NOT A LIE by showing Andrew WHEN or WHERE Palin provided the information on Trig.

&quot;Hey, you know, thatâ€™s a great point, in that weird conspiracy-theory freaky thing that people talk about that Trig isnâ€™t my real son. And a lot of people say, â€œWell you need to produce his birth certificate! You need to prove that heâ€™s your kid!â€ Which we have done.&quot; Sarah Palin, 12/04/2009

Come on. Make a liar out of Andrew or out of Palin. One of them is lying. Which one?  Produce the evidence of ANY kind, just as Andrew asked for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what about the LIE?  When, where did she provide all that?  It was a lie. Make it NOT A LIE by showing Andrew WHEN or WHERE Palin provided the information on Trig.</p>
<p>&#8220;Hey, you know, thatâ€™s a great point, in that weird conspiracy-theory freaky thing that people talk about that Trig isnâ€™t my real son. And a lot of people say, â€œWell you need to produce his birth certificate! You need to prove that heâ€™s your kid!â€ Which we have done.&#8221; Sarah Palin, 12/04/2009</p>
<p>Come on. Make a liar out of Andrew or out of Palin. One of them is lying. Which one?  Produce the evidence of ANY kind, just as Andrew asked for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rogert</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/04/is-sarah-palin-a-birther-no-but-the-left-wishes-she-was/#comment-31601</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=17253#comment-31601</guid>
		<description>And while we&#039;re at it; why does the left attack the right so much fro daring to question them? When they demanded that &quot;W&quot; produce his military records...he did! When the right responded by ASKING that John Kerry produce HIS military records...he refused! Once again...the left hypocritically demands something but refuses to respond in kind!
I would defy anyone to produce ANY evidence that I am a racist in any way shape or form, but I am sick and tired of any opposition to BO being classified as racist. Let&#039;s face it; that accusation is, in itself, become racist...and is most illuminating on the accusers.
I am completely against prejudice...in ANY form or direction! And I can provide witnesses!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And while we&#8217;re at it; why does the left attack the right so much fro daring to question them? When they demanded that &#8220;W&#8221; produce his military records&#8230;he did! When the right responded by ASKING that John Kerry produce HIS military records&#8230;he refused! Once again&#8230;the left hypocritically demands something but refuses to respond in kind!<br />
I would defy anyone to produce ANY evidence that I am a racist in any way shape or form, but I am sick and tired of any opposition to BO being classified as racist. Let&#8217;s face it; that accusation is, in itself, become racist&#8230;and is most illuminating on the accusers.<br />
I am completely against prejudice&#8230;in ANY form or direction! And I can provide witnesses!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

