<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Savoring the Left&#039;s Tear-Stained Tweets Over Obama&#039;s Afghanistan Speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/01/savoring-the-lefts-tear-stained-tweets-over-obamas-afghanistan-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/01/savoring-the-lefts-tear-stained-tweets-over-obamas-afghanistan-speech/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:34:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: politicalmoxie</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/01/savoring-the-lefts-tear-stained-tweets-over-obamas-afghanistan-speech/#comment-30903</link>
		<dc:creator>politicalmoxie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16903#comment-30903</guid>
		<description>Mr. Swindle,

Now&#039;s a good time:
After reading the above comment by Chuckie, perhaps a From the Pen with info on how many civilian were slaughtered thanks to ALL  those decisions. Make sure he includes the lack of outrage by those who purported to care so much about humanity.

At News Real: I laugh, I&#039;m inspired, I weep... above all I am educated by some of the best editors and commenters on the net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Swindle,</p>
<p>Now&#8217;s a good time:<br />
After reading the above comment by Chuckie, perhaps a From the Pen with info on how many civilian were slaughtered thanks to ALL  those decisions. Make sure he includes the lack of outrage by those who purported to care so much about humanity.</p>
<p>At News Real: I laugh, I&#8217;m inspired, I weep&#8230; above all I am educated by some of the best editors and commenters on the net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F. Swemson</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/01/savoring-the-lefts-tear-stained-tweets-over-obamas-afghanistan-speech/#comment-30870</link>
		<dc:creator>F. Swemson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16903#comment-30870</guid>
		<description>Len;

You&#039;re giving him far too much credit.

The military to him, just like the poor, the rich, &amp; everyone in between are merely pawns to be used &amp; discarded when it suits his needs to enhance his political prestige...

He&#039;s a sociopath... please don&#039;t assume that he&#039;s doing anything that might be considered normal by a rational observer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Len;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re giving him far too much credit.</p>
<p>The military to him, just like the poor, the rich, &amp; everyone in between are merely pawns to be used &amp; discarded when it suits his needs to enhance his political prestige&#8230;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s a sociopath&#8230; please don&#8217;t assume that he&#8217;s doing anything that might be considered normal by a rational observer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len Powder</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/01/savoring-the-lefts-tear-stained-tweets-over-obamas-afghanistan-speech/#comment-30902</link>
		<dc:creator>Len Powder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16903#comment-30902</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s suppose that Obama had decided not to dispatch 30,000 troops to Afghanistan. What would the result have been? His only other option would have been to set a withdrawal timetable in order to keep too many American soldiers&#039; lives from being sacrificed in a losing cause. The Left would have gleefully supported his decision. Who would have opposed it? Most Americans would have accepted the decision although their impression of Obama as a Commander in Chief would have diminished even more. The military community, especially, would find it difficult to view him as a Commander, even if it experienced relief because soldiers would at least be removed from Harm&#039;s Way.

Is it possible that Obama felt compelled to establish his credentials as Commander in Chief? He probably never took this role seriously, even during his campaign. One has to wonder why he didn&#039;t simply appoint a surrogate Czar to fulfill this role. Perhaps he has no surrogates in his past experiences who would be willing to serve in this capacity. After all, Marxists and Communists are generally opposed to waging &#039;imperialist&#039; wars. In this case Obama had to reluctantly accept that being a community organizer is not sufficient to fulfill the role of Commander of the Armed Forces. Reality may finally be sinking in and his inflated ego may have finally been forced to confront a challenge it was not prepared for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s suppose that Obama had decided not to dispatch 30,000 troops to Afghanistan. What would the result have been? His only other option would have been to set a withdrawal timetable in order to keep too many American soldiers&#8217; lives from being sacrificed in a losing cause. The Left would have gleefully supported his decision. Who would have opposed it? Most Americans would have accepted the decision although their impression of Obama as a Commander in Chief would have diminished even more. The military community, especially, would find it difficult to view him as a Commander, even if it experienced relief because soldiers would at least be removed from Harm&#8217;s Way.</p>
<p>Is it possible that Obama felt compelled to establish his credentials as Commander in Chief? He probably never took this role seriously, even during his campaign. One has to wonder why he didn&#8217;t simply appoint a surrogate Czar to fulfill this role. Perhaps he has no surrogates in his past experiences who would be willing to serve in this capacity. After all, Marxists and Communists are generally opposed to waging &#8216;imperialist&#8217; wars. In this case Obama had to reluctantly accept that being a community organizer is not sufficient to fulfill the role of Commander of the Armed Forces. Reality may finally be sinking in and his inflated ego may have finally been forced to confront a challenge it was not prepared for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Swindle</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/01/savoring-the-lefts-tear-stained-tweets-over-obamas-afghanistan-speech/#comment-30901</link>
		<dc:creator>David Swindle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16903#comment-30901</guid>
		<description>Do you understand what an &quot;ad hominem argument&quot; is and why it&#039;s illegitimate in intellectual discussion?

Apparently not.

Ad hominem is when you attack the speaker to try and disqualify their argument. That&#039;s what you&#039;re doing right now by saying that because I&#039;m not serving in the military I&#039;m not allowed to advocate that we continue the fight against Islamofascism.

As soon as someone employs an ad hominem argument in a debate then you immediately know that this is someone who does not know how to think. You&#039;ve demonstrated yourself as such. Rather than dialogue -- respond to the points raised in my response -- you just took the opportunity to further your monologue.

Thus you demonstrate that you&#039;re not here to engage in honest intellectual discussion. You&#039;re not here to expand your mind and your perspective through friendly engagement. You&#039;re here to sabotage people you hate. This will not be tolerated very long.

If you continue to respond to arguments with ad hominem attacks then you&#039;ll be in clear violation of our commenting guidelines and your commenting PRIVILEGES will be revoked. You have been warned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you understand what an &#8220;ad hominem argument&#8221; is and why it&#8217;s illegitimate in intellectual discussion?</p>
<p>Apparently not.</p>
<p>Ad hominem is when you attack the speaker to try and disqualify their argument. That&#8217;s what you&#8217;re doing right now by saying that because I&#8217;m not serving in the military I&#8217;m not allowed to advocate that we continue the fight against Islamofascism.</p>
<p>As soon as someone employs an ad hominem argument in a debate then you immediately know that this is someone who does not know how to think. You&#8217;ve demonstrated yourself as such. Rather than dialogue &#8212; respond to the points raised in my response &#8212; you just took the opportunity to further your monologue.</p>
<p>Thus you demonstrate that you&#8217;re not here to engage in honest intellectual discussion. You&#8217;re not here to expand your mind and your perspective through friendly engagement. You&#8217;re here to sabotage people you hate. This will not be tolerated very long.</p>
<p>If you continue to respond to arguments with ad hominem attacks then you&#8217;ll be in clear violation of our commenting guidelines and your commenting PRIVILEGES will be revoked. You have been warned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F. Swemson</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/01/savoring-the-lefts-tear-stained-tweets-over-obamas-afghanistan-speech/#comment-30900</link>
		<dc:creator>F. Swemson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16903#comment-30900</guid>
		<description>Hey Harmon;

Were you born stupid, or do you work at it ?

I&#039;m a former Marine, and I wouldn&#039;t advise my kids to join the service these days... not the way THIS administration treats the military...

Besides, David&#039;s making a far more important contribution to his country doing what he&#039;s doing, to help prevent jerks like you continue to screw up this country even further that it already is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Harmon;</p>
<p>Were you born stupid, or do you work at it ?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a former Marine, and I wouldn&#8217;t advise my kids to join the service these days&#8230; not the way THIS administration treats the military&#8230;</p>
<p>Besides, David&#8217;s making a far more important contribution to his country doing what he&#8217;s doing, to help prevent jerks like you continue to screw up this country even further that it already is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F. Swemson</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/01/savoring-the-lefts-tear-stained-tweets-over-obamas-afghanistan-speech/#comment-30899</link>
		<dc:creator>F. Swemson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16903#comment-30899</guid>
		<description>Sorry.. I don&#039;t twitter...

I don&#039;t even have an iPod, &amp; I&#039;m a classical pianist......

Well... maybe that&#039;s WHY I don&#039;t have an iPod...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry.. I don&#8217;t twitter&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even have an iPod, &amp; I&#8217;m a classical pianist&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Well&#8230; maybe that&#8217;s WHY I don&#8217;t have an iPod&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuckie</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/01/savoring-the-lefts-tear-stained-tweets-over-obamas-afghanistan-speech/#comment-30898</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuckie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16903#comment-30898</guid>
		<description>We had a Democrat in office when we split Korea into two countries,a Democrat in office when we sent advisors into Nam, a Democrat who started a Draft to feed the Gods of War in Nam and a Democrat who lost VietNam. Some where in all of this how does one equate the Democrats as the PEACE PARTY. Now we have a Democrat who Voted against the War before he was FOR the War.
As those who have been in the HELL HOLE of War have told me,&quot;Either go in and win or get the hell out!
Nothing will help the cause of Peace more than the Democrats starting the Draft and being Politically Correct, as they are, start DRAFTING all those Pretty little Girls 18 and over!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had a Democrat in office when we split Korea into two countries,a Democrat in office when we sent advisors into Nam, a Democrat who started a Draft to feed the Gods of War in Nam and a Democrat who lost VietNam. Some where in all of this how does one equate the Democrats as the PEACE PARTY. Now we have a Democrat who Voted against the War before he was FOR the War.<br />
As those who have been in the HELL HOLE of War have told me,&#8221;Either go in and win or get the hell out!<br />
Nothing will help the cause of Peace more than the Democrats starting the Draft and being Politically Correct, as they are, start DRAFTING all those Pretty little Girls 18 and over!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harmon</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/01/savoring-the-lefts-tear-stained-tweets-over-obamas-afghanistan-speech/#comment-30897</link>
		<dc:creator>Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16903#comment-30897</guid>
		<description>&quot;Upon encountering the Chickenhawk argument you should immediately realize that youâ€™re dealing with someone who is unable to think rationally.&quot;

Really? You may think you are being rational, however I think that you might be singing a different tune if you were subject to the draft as Dick &quot;Five deferments&quot; Cheney was.  You would not be as idealistic, if at all, if that was the case. Maybe I am crazy and unable to this rationally, but that what I think.

You are a lucky ducky, you never have to serve our country in the military. You can sit on you duff at you computer and criticize others.  Nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Upon encountering the Chickenhawk argument you should immediately realize that youâ€™re dealing with someone who is unable to think rationally.&#8221;</p>
<p>Really? You may think you are being rational, however I think that you might be singing a different tune if you were subject to the draft as Dick &#8220;Five deferments&#8221; Cheney was.  You would not be as idealistic, if at all, if that was the case. Maybe I am crazy and unable to this rationally, but that what I think.</p>
<p>You are a lucky ducky, you never have to serve our country in the military. You can sit on you duff at you computer and criticize others.  Nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: politicalmoxie</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/01/savoring-the-lefts-tear-stained-tweets-over-obamas-afghanistan-speech/#comment-30896</link>
		<dc:creator>politicalmoxie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16903#comment-30896</guid>
		<description>So true...it is sketchy in the beginning.  I love it though....you will
find me on twitter @politicalmoxie let me know if you&#039;re on and how
to follow you.  If you aren&#039;t on Twitter, join...you will fit right
into the conservative scene.   Again, thanks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So true&#8230;it is sketchy in the beginning.  I love it though&#8230;.you will<br />
find me on twitter @politicalmoxie let me know if you&#8217;re on and how<br />
to follow you.  If you aren&#8217;t on Twitter, join&#8230;you will fit right<br />
into the conservative scene.   Again, thanks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F. Swemson</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/01/savoring-the-lefts-tear-stained-tweets-over-obamas-afghanistan-speech/#comment-30895</link>
		<dc:creator>F. Swemson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16903#comment-30895</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t be intimidated by your first look into the software.. It takes a little getting used to..

It probably took me about 2 to 3 days to get the help I needed from the company to learn what I needed to learn.

It was rather extraordinary, because the president of the company actually replied directly to my questions.

If you have any problems, I&#039;ll help you through them as best I can... The big trick is to get your preferences panels set up the right way.

Ribbit !   :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t be intimidated by your first look into the software.. It takes a little getting used to..</p>
<p>It probably took me about 2 to 3 days to get the help I needed from the company to learn what I needed to learn.</p>
<p>It was rather extraordinary, because the president of the company actually replied directly to my questions.</p>
<p>If you have any problems, I&#8217;ll help you through them as best I can&#8230; The big trick is to get your preferences panels set up the right way.</p>
<p>Ribbit !   <img src='http://www.newsrealblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: politicalmoxie</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/01/savoring-the-lefts-tear-stained-tweets-over-obamas-afghanistan-speech/#comment-30894</link>
		<dc:creator>politicalmoxie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16903#comment-30894</guid>
		<description>@ Swemson

You Sir are my Prince, and all this time I was thinking...FROG!

Am on my way to rainmaker...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Swemson</p>
<p>You Sir are my Prince, and all this time I was thinking&#8230;FROG!</p>
<p>Am on my way to rainmaker&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F. Swemson</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/12/01/savoring-the-lefts-tear-stained-tweets-over-obamas-afghanistan-speech/#comment-30893</link>
		<dc:creator>F. Swemson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16903#comment-30893</guid>
		<description>PS: The 2 Davids have no control over the technical functions of the Wordpress blog software. And I think it&#039;s safe to say that none of the blog software system out there have those tool attached to what it basically a rather simple messaging software.

There is a way to do this for yourself however.

There&#039;s an incredible piece of (inexpensive) spell checking software called Spell Catcher, that I use, and which I highly recommend to everyone. You can find it here:

http://www.rainmakerinc.com/

Spell Catcher positions itself between the user and anything on the computer that you write in, including all word processing software (It beats the hell out of the spell checking tool in MS Word) you mail software, your browser and any blogs you might be posting on. So wherever you type anything, the software is always there to correct virtually all the errors that you make. The best thing about it IMHO, is that it&#039;s super easy to teach the software the correct spelling for any mistake you may make, and regardless of what program you make the mistake in, it then automatically corrects the same mistake, no matter where you make it in the future. This means that the software gets smarter and more useful, the more you use it.

You can download it for a free 2 week trial, and if you decide to buy it, it&#039;s only $40.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS: The 2 Davids have no control over the technical functions of the WordPress blog software. And I think it&#8217;s safe to say that none of the blog software system out there have those tool attached to what it basically a rather simple messaging software.</p>
<p>There is a way to do this for yourself however.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an incredible piece of (inexpensive) spell checking software called Spell Catcher, that I use, and which I highly recommend to everyone. You can find it here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rainmakerinc.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.rainmakerinc.com/</a></p>
<p>Spell Catcher positions itself between the user and anything on the computer that you write in, including all word processing software (It beats the hell out of the spell checking tool in MS Word) you mail software, your browser and any blogs you might be posting on. So wherever you type anything, the software is always there to correct virtually all the errors that you make. The best thing about it IMHO, is that it&#8217;s super easy to teach the software the correct spelling for any mistake you may make, and regardless of what program you make the mistake in, it then automatically corrects the same mistake, no matter where you make it in the future. This means that the software gets smarter and more useful, the more you use it.</p>
<p>You can download it for a free 2 week trial, and if you decide to buy it, it&#8217;s only $40.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

