<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times develops strange new respect for laws, ethics and stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/23/new-york-times-develops-strange-new-respect-for-laws-ethics-and-stuff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/23/new-york-times-develops-strange-new-respect-for-laws-ethics-and-stuff/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:34:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Driscoll &#187; The Warmchurian Candidate</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/23/new-york-times-develops-strange-new-respect-for-laws-ethics-and-stuff/#comment-28055</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Driscoll &#187; The Warmchurian Candidate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16018#comment-28055</guid>
		<description>[...] Of course, the real story lies in the hacked computer code files, not bitchy messages between some scientists, and how they were acquired. (Funny, the mainstream media isnâ€™t this scrupulous about the source of â€œstolen documentsâ€ when they su....) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course, the real story lies in the hacked computer code files, not bitchy messages between some scientists, and how they were acquired. (Funny, the mainstream media isnâ€™t this scrupulous about the source of â€œstolen documentsâ€ when they su&#8230;.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Oh, Bennie, card tricks. If I&#8217;d known&#8230;&#8217; &#171; NewsReal Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/23/new-york-times-develops-strange-new-respect-for-laws-ethics-and-stuff/#comment-28038</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8216;Oh, Bennie, card tricks. If I&#8217;d known&#8230;&#8217; &#171; NewsReal Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16018#comment-28038</guid>
		<description>[...] Of course, the real story lies in the hacked computer code files, not bitchy messages between some scientists, and how they were acquired. (Funny, the mainstream media isn&#8217;t this scrupulous about the source of &#8220;stolen documents&#8221; ....) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course, the real story lies in the hacked computer code files, not bitchy messages between some scientists, and how they were acquired. (Funny, the mainstream media isn&#8217;t this scrupulous about the source of &#8220;stolen documents&#8221; &#8230;.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nothing to See Here, Folks. The Lamestream Media on Climategate</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/23/new-york-times-develops-strange-new-respect-for-laws-ethics-and-stuff/#comment-28054</link>
		<dc:creator>Nothing to See Here, Folks. The Lamestream Media on Climategate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16018#comment-28054</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nothing to See Here, Folks. The Lamestream Media on Climategate &#171; NewsReal Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/23/new-york-times-develops-strange-new-respect-for-laws-ethics-and-stuff/#comment-28037</link>
		<dc:creator>Nothing to See Here, Folks. The Lamestream Media on Climategate &#171; NewsReal Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16018#comment-28037</guid>
		<description>[...] used to seize control of the U.S.â€”and worldâ€”economy in the name of â€œglobal warming,â€ the New York Times is suddenly queasy about exposing documents that were â€œnever intended for the publi... The last time they kept a secret this well, was when Stalin was starving millions of Ukrainians to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] used to seize control of the U.S.â€”and worldâ€”economy in the name of â€œglobal warming,â€ the New York Times is suddenly queasy about exposing documents that were â€œnever intended for the publi&#8230; The last time they kept a secret this well, was when Stalin was starving millions of Ukrainians to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty Trout</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/23/new-york-times-develops-strange-new-respect-for-laws-ethics-and-stuff/#comment-28036</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty Trout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16018#comment-28036</guid>
		<description>Good comment Paul, guess we will have to stop paying attention to them, just like MSNBC. What are they going to do in Florida, not write about people trying to escape from Cuba?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good comment Paul, guess we will have to stop paying attention to them, just like MSNBC. What are they going to do in Florida, not write about people trying to escape from Cuba?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turkeys of the Year &#171; wehategringos.com</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/23/new-york-times-develops-strange-new-respect-for-laws-ethics-and-stuff/#comment-28035</link>
		<dc:creator>Turkeys of the Year &#171; wehategringos.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16018#comment-28035</guid>
		<description>[...] More recently, the paper&#8217;s website demonstrated that its real motto is &#8220;All the inconvenient news that&#8217;s fit to suppress.&#8221; The Times&#8217; lead environmental blogger, Andrew Revkin, haughtily refused to reprint damning e-mails leaked by a hacker in the burgeoning &#8220;ClimateGate&#8221; scandal. The documents reveal a long trail of manipulated data, but Revkin balked at the ill-gotten trove. The  blabbermouths at the Times had no problem exposing national security secrets to undermine Bush. But shed light on scientific hoaxes that undermine Al Gore?  Unethical! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More recently, the paper&#8217;s website demonstrated that its real motto is &#8220;All the inconvenient news that&#8217;s fit to suppress.&#8221; The Times&#8217; lead environmental blogger, Andrew Revkin, haughtily refused to reprint damning e-mails leaked by a hacker in the burgeoning &#8220;ClimateGate&#8221; scandal. The documents reveal a long trail of manipulated data, but Revkin balked at the ill-gotten trove. The  blabbermouths at the Times had no problem exposing national security secrets to undermine Bush. But shed light on scientific hoaxes that undermine Al Gore?  Unethical! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/23/new-york-times-develops-strange-new-respect-for-laws-ethics-and-stuff/#comment-28053</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16018#comment-28053</guid>
		<description>This is just depressing of The New York Times. They will show EVERYTHING, unless it goes against the theory of Global Warming. Head scientists who are showing that their grand scheme had failed from the start and The New York Times just allowing the falsehood and complete treachery to happen is sad. They will absolutely de-classify everything. They could hack into the FBI, CIA, and DoD and get everything and just show it to the world, unless it is against the theory of Global Warming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just depressing of The New York Times. They will show EVERYTHING, unless it goes against the theory of Global Warming. Head scientists who are showing that their grand scheme had failed from the start and The New York Times just allowing the falsehood and complete treachery to happen is sad. They will absolutely de-classify everything. They could hack into the FBI, CIA, and DoD and get everything and just show it to the world, unless it is against the theory of Global Warming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revnant Dream</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/23/new-york-times-develops-strange-new-respect-for-laws-ethics-and-stuff/#comment-28052</link>
		<dc:creator>Revnant Dream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16018#comment-28052</guid>
		<description>What good has ever come from the NYtimes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What good has ever come from the NYtimes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Cottrell</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/23/new-york-times-develops-strange-new-respect-for-laws-ethics-and-stuff/#comment-28034</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Cottrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16018#comment-28034</guid>
		<description>&quot;The documents appear to have been acquired illegally and contain all manner of private information and statements that were never intended for the public eye, so they wonâ€™t be posted here.&quot;

But, by Gum, we&#039;ll publish any classified military strategy or intelligence program we can get our stinky little fingers on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The documents appear to have been acquired illegally and contain all manner of private information and statements that were never intended for the public eye, so they wonâ€™t be posted here.&#8221;</p>
<p>But, by Gum, we&#8217;ll publish any classified military strategy or intelligence program we can get our stinky little fingers on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peachey</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/23/new-york-times-develops-strange-new-respect-for-laws-ethics-and-stuff/#comment-28051</link>
		<dc:creator>peachey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16018#comment-28051</guid>
		<description>Follow the &quot;global warming&quot; sham and you will find the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow the &#8220;global warming&#8221; sham and you will find the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In the Know</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/23/new-york-times-develops-strange-new-respect-for-laws-ethics-and-stuff/#comment-28050</link>
		<dc:creator>In the Know</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16018#comment-28050</guid>
		<description>You are amazing. As a scientist, you understand that your research alone does not constitute a consesus. If there were overwhelming evidence that was unbiased (which, is quite obviously not the case) to support the &quot;warming&quot; claim there would be no argument. I remember the global cooling crisis of the late 70&#039;s, do you? You want to deal with pollution, let&#039;s do it. However, this crap isn&#039;t about pollution. It may have started out like that, but it&#039;s been hijacked by communists and criminals who needed a crisis to use as a vehicle to get through the gate. Now they&#039;re in and I for one ain&#039;t lettin&#039; em get off the bus without a fight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are amazing. As a scientist, you understand that your research alone does not constitute a consesus. If there were overwhelming evidence that was unbiased (which, is quite obviously not the case) to support the &#8220;warming&#8221; claim there would be no argument. I remember the global cooling crisis of the late 70&#8242;s, do you? You want to deal with pollution, let&#8217;s do it. However, this crap isn&#8217;t about pollution. It may have started out like that, but it&#8217;s been hijacked by communists and criminals who needed a crisis to use as a vehicle to get through the gate. Now they&#8217;re in and I for one ain&#8217;t lettin&#8217; em get off the bus without a fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Kabrt</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/23/new-york-times-develops-strange-new-respect-for-laws-ethics-and-stuff/#comment-28048</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Kabrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=16018#comment-28048</guid>
		<description>Quick, put Daniel Ellsberg on it.  Oh, wait, ok, I see.  Forget that idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick, put Daniel Ellsberg on it.  Oh, wait, ok, I see.  Forget that idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

