http://astuteblogger.blogspot.com/2009/11/militarys-arab-student-visa-racket.html

There’s not supposed to be diversity in the military, anyway, hence uniforms, marching in unison, etc.

http://astuteblogger.blogspot.com/2009/11/militarys-arab-student-visa-racket.html

There’s not supposed to be diversity in the military, anyway, hence uniforms, marching in unison, etc.

Exactly. American Muslims live/believe their own form of doublespeak:

- they know and do not know that Islam seeks to convert the kafir and control all nations,
- are conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies knowing that while the Koran and Hadith might advocate violence, it should be viewed “contextually” and is capable of being modernized
- to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, that shariah would be more just and equitable than Western law if only it can be separated from its traditional, tribal implementation
- to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, insisting that (1) America wrong to fight in the Middle East, and (2) Hasan was correct in not wanting to go to Afganistan and fight against fellow Muslims, but that he violated the rules of subtlety and etiquette by shooting up an army base
- to believe that democracy was impossible due to history and ethnic pride but that infecting a democratic nation (UK, France, USA) with their retrogressive beliefs and systems would not rip democracy to shreds
- to forget whatever it was necessary to forget then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed by behaving like a modern in the new home yet wearing the traditional mantle of piety when visiting the mosque or the old country

Exactly. American Muslims live/believe their own form of doublespeak:

- they know and do not know that Islam seeks to convert the kafir and control all nations,
- are conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies knowing that while the Koran and Hadith might advocate violence, it should be viewed “contextually” and is capable of being modernized
- to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, that shariah would be more just and equitable than Western law if only it can be separated from its traditional, tribal implementation
- to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, insisting that (1) America wrong to fight in the Middle East, and (2) Hasan was correct in not wanting to go to Afganistan and fight against fellow Muslims, but that he violated the rules of subtlety and etiquette by shooting up an army base
- to believe that democracy was impossible due to history and ethnic pride but that infecting a democratic nation (UK, France, USA) with their retrogressive beliefs and systems would not rip democracy to shreds
- to forget whatever it was necessary to forget then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed by behaving like a modern in the new home yet wearing the traditional mantle of piety when visiting the mosque or the old country

We have read with concern the many signs Major Hasan provided which would indicate an unstable and potentially dangerous frame of mind. Our concern is that those who actually saw and heard the signs and those to whom the signs were reported did not act upon them. From Hasan’s contact with a radical imam, to the initials SoA (Soldier of Allah) on his business card, to his comment that he was a Muslim first and a soldier second – there is no doubt the signs that he was potentially dangerous were there for all to see.

Furthermore, he was under surveillance by two Terrorist Task Forces, one with Department of Defense oversight and the other with FBI oversight. So why wasn’t he stopped?

The answer is quite simple – The military does not have an objective and culturally neutral system that collects information and evaluates it to determine the degree (or level) of aggression an individual is displaying, nor has it people who have a clear responsibility to observe and report this information within an objective system nor a team who is responsible to evaluate it and respond. The military does not have the AMIS solution and it desperately needs it! Major Hasan has illustrated out vulnerable we are, learn more about the problem and the solution by reading our Blog: http://Blog.AggressionManagement.com

The Shari’ah is an inseperable component of Islam, and our Muslim neighbors–their protestations to the contrary–are fully aware of that and is the reason they cannot and will not publicly renounce and denounce jihad.

Every Muslim American, from the nicest to the most militant, including those serving in the military, is living a lie; believing as they do–even if only casually– in a system, a complete way of life, that is both antithetical to democracy and demonstrably incompatible with our constitution.

Islam–as it’s written–has no legitimate place in the U.S.

Ma and Pa America need to understand that and I believe the Hasan trial will help make that clear.