F. Swemson

Global Warming: Exposing the Far Left’s Lies, Part 4

Posted on November 11 2009 5:00 am
I'm an Objectivist, a disciple of Ayn Rand since I was 15. Graduate of NBI (Nathaniel Branden Institute) 1964 I was a philosophy major @ NYU & dropped out to join the Marine Corps Served as a Combat Photographer in late 60's I've been writing for over 20 years.
Be Sociable, Share!
Print This Post Print This Post


Click here for Part 1 of this 5-part series.

One of the most common problems people have when I explain the truth about the AGW hoax, is that they simply can’t understand how such a huge number of people in science, government, the UN, and the media can all be lying. Of course they’re NOT all lying. A large percentage of these people are just blind followers, who believe that the AGW theory must be true, simply because President Barack Obama, former Vice President Al Gore and all those big shot scientists, media spokesmen and “environmentalists” say it is. When you think about it, it’s easy to understand why that’s the case.

But they ARE lying, and we’ve known that for a fact for quite a while now.

When you think about it, it almost seems like a case of mass hysteria caused by a mass psychosis of some kind. Maybe the conspiracy theorists were right when they started complaining about the government fluoridating our water supply. H.L. Mencken once said that,

“Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public”

An updated version of that famous quote for today, when referring to “the great unwashed” might read: “Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the American public.”

We now know of course, that the entire CO2 story they’ve been pushing is pure nonsense. As I said in Part 2 of this series: It’s The Sun Stupid! Since there IS no scientific evidence that CO2 has anything more than an insignificant effect on our climate, the IPCC has been covering their tracks for years. As the absurdity of their entire scientific premise began to become more obvious to rational observers, they started massaging the data to fit their story in rather extraordinary ways. The best example of this is seen in their “Hockey Stick” graph.

When the IPCC issued it’s first report in 1991, before they became as corrupt as they are now, they used a simplified but accurate version of the graph, showing the temperature history of the last thousand years. So we have to take one more look at it, as I believe what you’re about to see may well prove to be the smoking gun that puts these liars out of business.

It’s easy to see what their problem was… it was the Medieval Warm Period. In order to get anyone to believe that the emissions from our use of hydrocarbon based fuels were the primary cause of warming, they would need to explain what caused the 3 centuries of warming leading up to the peak of the Medieval Warm Period. In his presentation made in Minnesota, Lord Monckton spoke of a University of Oklahoma Geology professor by the name of David Deming, who said that in 2005 he received an email from someone deeply involved in the AGW movement which said: “We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period”, and that’s exactly what they did, with their new graph which replaced the one above. This new graph appeared for the first time in the IPCC’s 2001 report, and it’s called the “HOCKEY-STICK” for obvious reasons.

The IPCC’s infamous and now discredited “hockey-stick” graph that falsely abolished the medieval warm period and enhanced by at least half of the true temperature increase since 1980, giving the misleading impression that temperatures in the latter half of the 20th century were unprecedented in the recent history of the Earth. In fact temperatures were warmer than the present for almost two-thirds of the last 10,000 years – most recently during the “medieval climate optimum,” a period from about 950 to 1350 A.D. The “hockey-stick” appeared in the IPCC’s 2001 assessment report six time, and in full color, the only graph to be so favored. The graph was not based on science. It was a political statement.

They deny falsifying any of the statistics of course, and say that they merely “normalized” the earlier data. They also fail to disclose what they’ve done to the more recent data on this graph. Notice the red lines at the far right side of the graph? They’re not red in the IPCC report. What they don’t tell you is that the red line data above, comes only from Northern Hemisphere statistics. They don’t represent real “global” statistics at all! They’ve been lying through their teeth for years, and we know it. Gore however wasn’t satisfied with the IPCC’s lies, he had go one better. They didn’t seem scary enough to him, so he predicted that the melting ice sheets in the arctic would cause sea levels to rise 610cm (20 ft), even though the IPCC’s prediction for sea level rise was only 6cm (2.36”).

Gore’s been simply shameless with his lies. Remember how he keeps telling us, that the consensus is in, and that the 2,500 scientists at the IPCC have proved it? Well the fact is that the IPCC’s climate estimates were based on only 4 scientific papers, not on the consensus of 2,500 scientists. I don’t think any rational person can look at the two graphs above, and see the IPCC’s reports as anything other than what they are, a pack of lies.

Fortunately, we do have 2 things to be happy about right now.

The first is what I like to think of as a divine intervention. It began when the warming ended in 1998, continues to this day, and will probably last for the next 10 to 20 years, as the earth has now entered another cooling cycle. Solar activity goes up and down in known cycles that allow us to make fairly accurate predictions. I can’t wait to see the first photo of Gore in a heavy overcoat and earmuffs, but the lying weasel will probably be hiding under his desk at his beach front condo for the next 20 or so winters from now on. I think it’s a safe bet that we’ll never see any more photos of him skiing with his family

The second is that it looks like these charlatans may already know that the jig is up, and have begun to circle their wagons in order to begin their cover-up. On September 23, 2009, writing in The National Review Online, Patrick Michaels published an article entitled “The Dog Ate Global Warming.” The article begins as follows:

Imagine if there were no reliable records of global surface temperature. Raucous policy debates such as cap-and-trade would have no scientific basis, Gore would at this point be little more than a historical footnote, and Obama would not be spending this U.N. session talking up a (likely unattainable) international climate deal in Copenhagen in December.

Steel yourself for the new reality, because the data needed to verify the gloom-and-doom warming forecasts have disappeared.

Legitimate scientists have been filing freedom of information act suits, demanding to see the original data upon which the IPCC and others involved in this scam have been basing their projections and their conclusion, and just as you would expect, the dog ate the data!

I recommend that you read the whole story, which you can do right here.

In Part 5, we’ll conclude with the political ramifications of this whole disgusting affair.

Be Sociable, Share!
5 Responses leave one →

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

Copyright 2019 NewsReal Blog

The Theme Foundry