<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: â€œMarxo-Sapiensâ€ to the Rescue, Part 2: Prepare for 1,900 Pages of Unintended Consequences</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/09/%e2%80%9cmarxo-sapiens%e2%80%9d-to-the-rescue-part-2-prepare-for-1900-pages-of-unintended-consequences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/09/%e2%80%9cmarxo-sapiens%e2%80%9d-to-the-rescue-part-2-prepare-for-1900-pages-of-unintended-consequences/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:34:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve R</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/09/%e2%80%9cmarxo-sapiens%e2%80%9d-to-the-rescue-part-2-prepare-for-1900-pages-of-unintended-consequences/#comment-24204</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=14380#comment-24204</guid>
		<description>Many are the pundits now who claim the Senate will moderate, diminish, perhaps even kill Obamacare.  I am not one who buys that song-and-dance.  Hawwy Weed won&#039;t be outdone, and there are too many fence-sitters in the Senate for comfort.  Joe Leiberman is talking a good fight right now, but some tinkering (a &#039;trigger&#039;?) could well turn him.
I&#039;m reinforced in this view by this transcript(from NRO) of Charles Krauthammer&#039;s take on the issue from last night&#039;s Fox News All-stars.

Krauthammer&#039;s Take   [NRO Staff]



From last night&#039;s Fox News All-Stars.


On the passage of health care in the House:



In the Senate, Lieberman has said he will stand in the way of a public option. I&#039;m not sure that will succeed, because all the Senate has to do is put in a trigger, and if a trigger is inserted, then Lieberman will be against it but Olympia Snowe will probably support it, and you will get Democrats like Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, who have been on the fence on this, who will also [vote yes].



So I think it&#039;s possible that a public option will come out of the Senate which could be under a trigger.



But I think the more general issue about the politics of this is that Pelosi has led her party over a cliff. If, as is less likely, it gets stuck in the Senate, then a lot of Democrats are way out on a limb the way they were after the cap-and-trade vote in the House. [And] if it passes in any form in the Senate, the Democrats are going to have a health-care proposal which I think will haunt them for a decade.



There is so much pain in here â€” increase in taxes, increase in premiums, extra bureaucracy, interference in the medical treatment of patients â€” which people will be able to feel and to see within months and surely within years. This will be a millstone around Democrats for years if it passes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many are the pundits now who claim the Senate will moderate, diminish, perhaps even kill Obamacare.  I am not one who buys that song-and-dance.  Hawwy Weed won&#8217;t be outdone, and there are too many fence-sitters in the Senate for comfort.  Joe Leiberman is talking a good fight right now, but some tinkering (a &#8216;trigger&#8217;?) could well turn him.<br />
I&#8217;m reinforced in this view by this transcript(from NRO) of Charles Krauthammer&#8217;s take on the issue from last night&#8217;s Fox News All-stars.</p>
<p>Krauthammer&#8217;s Take   [NRO Staff]</p>
<p>From last night&#8217;s Fox News All-Stars.</p>
<p>On the passage of health care in the House:</p>
<p>In the Senate, Lieberman has said he will stand in the way of a public option. I&#8217;m not sure that will succeed, because all the Senate has to do is put in a trigger, and if a trigger is inserted, then Lieberman will be against it but Olympia Snowe will probably support it, and you will get Democrats like Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, who have been on the fence on this, who will also [vote yes].</p>
<p>So I think it&#8217;s possible that a public option will come out of the Senate which could be under a trigger.</p>
<p>But I think the more general issue about the politics of this is that Pelosi has led her party over a cliff. If, as is less likely, it gets stuck in the Senate, then a lot of Democrats are way out on a limb the way they were after the cap-and-trade vote in the House. [And] if it passes in any form in the Senate, the Democrats are going to have a health-care proposal which I think will haunt them for a decade.</p>
<p>There is so much pain in here â€” increase in taxes, increase in premiums, extra bureaucracy, interference in the medical treatment of patients â€” which people will be able to feel and to see within months and surely within years. This will be a millstone around Democrats for years if it passes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve R</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/09/%e2%80%9cmarxo-sapiens%e2%80%9d-to-the-rescue-part-2-prepare-for-1900-pages-of-unintended-consequences/#comment-24209</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=14380#comment-24209</guid>
		<description>Many are the pundits now who claim the Senate will moderate, diminish, perhaps even kill Obamacare.  I am not one who buys that song-and-dance.  Hawwy Weed won&#039;t be outdone, and there are too many fence-sitters in the Senate for comfort.  Joe Leiberman is talking a good fight right now, but some tinkering (a &#039;trigger&#039;?) could well turn him.
I&#039;m reinforced in this view by this transcript(from NRO) of Charles Krauthammer&#039;s take on the issue from last night&#039;s Fox News All-stars.

Krauthammer&#039;s Take   [NRO Staff]



From last night&#039;s Fox News All-Stars.


On the passage of health care in the House:



In the Senate, Lieberman has said he will stand in the way of a public option. I&#039;m not sure that will succeed, because all the Senate has to do is put in a trigger, and if a trigger is inserted, then Lieberman will be against it but Olympia Snowe will probably support it, and you will get Democrats like Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, who have been on the fence on this, who will also [vote yes].



So I think it&#039;s possible that a public option will come out of the Senate which could be under a trigger.



But I think the more general issue about the politics of this is that Pelosi has led her party over a cliff. If, as is less likely, it gets stuck in the Senate, then a lot of Democrats are way out on a limb the way they were after the cap-and-trade vote in the House. [And] if it passes in any form in the Senate, the Democrats are going to have a health-care proposal which I think will haunt them for a decade.



There is so much pain in here â€” increase in taxes, increase in premiums, extra bureaucracy, interference in the medical treatment of patients â€” which people will be able to feel and to see within months and surely within years. This will be a millstone around Democrats for years if it passes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many are the pundits now who claim the Senate will moderate, diminish, perhaps even kill Obamacare.  I am not one who buys that song-and-dance.  Hawwy Weed won&#8217;t be outdone, and there are too many fence-sitters in the Senate for comfort.  Joe Leiberman is talking a good fight right now, but some tinkering (a &#8216;trigger&#8217;?) could well turn him.<br />
I&#8217;m reinforced in this view by this transcript(from NRO) of Charles Krauthammer&#8217;s take on the issue from last night&#8217;s Fox News All-stars.</p>
<p>Krauthammer&#8217;s Take   [NRO Staff]</p>
<p>From last night&#8217;s Fox News All-Stars.</p>
<p>On the passage of health care in the House:</p>
<p>In the Senate, Lieberman has said he will stand in the way of a public option. I&#8217;m not sure that will succeed, because all the Senate has to do is put in a trigger, and if a trigger is inserted, then Lieberman will be against it but Olympia Snowe will probably support it, and you will get Democrats like Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, who have been on the fence on this, who will also [vote yes].</p>
<p>So I think it&#8217;s possible that a public option will come out of the Senate which could be under a trigger.</p>
<p>But I think the more general issue about the politics of this is that Pelosi has led her party over a cliff. If, as is less likely, it gets stuck in the Senate, then a lot of Democrats are way out on a limb the way they were after the cap-and-trade vote in the House. [And] if it passes in any form in the Senate, the Democrats are going to have a health-care proposal which I think will haunt them for a decade.</p>
<p>There is so much pain in here â€” increase in taxes, increase in premiums, extra bureaucracy, interference in the medical treatment of patients â€” which people will be able to feel and to see within months and surely within years. This will be a millstone around Democrats for years if it passes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMM</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/09/%e2%80%9cmarxo-sapiens%e2%80%9d-to-the-rescue-part-2-prepare-for-1900-pages-of-unintended-consequences/#comment-24205</link>
		<dc:creator>MMM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=14380#comment-24205</guid>
		<description>This bill was written to &#039;redistribute wealth&#039; and doesn&#039;t do a damn thing to provide affordable healthcare.  What are middle class Americans going to do when they have to replace a heater, or replace a roof -- they aren&#039;t going to be able to afford to do it because the government has &#039;redistributed&#039; their wealth in the form of this ridiculous tax on their income.

FIGHT OPPRESSION.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This bill was written to &#8216;redistribute wealth&#8217; and doesn&#8217;t do a damn thing to provide affordable healthcare.  What are middle class Americans going to do when they have to replace a heater, or replace a roof &#8212; they aren&#8217;t going to be able to afford to do it because the government has &#8216;redistributed&#8217; their wealth in the form of this ridiculous tax on their income.</p>
<p>FIGHT OPPRESSION.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMM</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/09/%e2%80%9cmarxo-sapiens%e2%80%9d-to-the-rescue-part-2-prepare-for-1900-pages-of-unintended-consequences/#comment-24210</link>
		<dc:creator>MMM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=14380#comment-24210</guid>
		<description>This bill was written to &#039;redistribute wealth&#039; and doesn&#039;t do a damn thing to provide affordable healthcare.  What are middle class Americans going to do when they have to replace a heater, or replace a roof -- they aren&#039;t going to be able to afford to do it because the government has &#039;redistributed&#039; their wealth in the form of this ridiculous tax on their income.

FIGHT OPPRESSION.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This bill was written to &#8216;redistribute wealth&#8217; and doesn&#8217;t do a damn thing to provide affordable healthcare.  What are middle class Americans going to do when they have to replace a heater, or replace a roof &#8212; they aren&#8217;t going to be able to afford to do it because the government has &#8216;redistributed&#8217; their wealth in the form of this ridiculous tax on their income.</p>
<p>FIGHT OPPRESSION.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theodore Blunt</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/09/%e2%80%9cmarxo-sapiens%e2%80%9d-to-the-rescue-part-2-prepare-for-1900-pages-of-unintended-consequences/#comment-24208</link>
		<dc:creator>Theodore Blunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=14380#comment-24208</guid>
		<description>This bill was written to buy the votes of people who no longer want the government to care for them &quot;from womb to tomb&quot; but now expect care  from &quot;injection to reserection&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This bill was written to buy the votes of people who no longer want the government to care for them &#8220;from womb to tomb&#8221; but now expect care  from &#8220;injection to reserection&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theodore Blunt</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/09/%e2%80%9cmarxo-sapiens%e2%80%9d-to-the-rescue-part-2-prepare-for-1900-pages-of-unintended-consequences/#comment-24213</link>
		<dc:creator>Theodore Blunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=14380#comment-24213</guid>
		<description>This bill was written to buy the votes of people who no longer want the government to care for them &quot;from womb to tomb&quot; but now expect care  from &quot;injection to reserection&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This bill was written to buy the votes of people who no longer want the government to care for them &#8220;from womb to tomb&#8221; but now expect care  from &#8220;injection to reserection&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy DeWhitney</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/09/%e2%80%9cmarxo-sapiens%e2%80%9d-to-the-rescue-part-2-prepare-for-1900-pages-of-unintended-consequences/#comment-24207</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy DeWhitney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=14380#comment-24207</guid>
		<description>Whatever happend to the Plain English Amendment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever happend to the Plain English Amendment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy DeWhitney</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/09/%e2%80%9cmarxo-sapiens%e2%80%9d-to-the-rescue-part-2-prepare-for-1900-pages-of-unintended-consequences/#comment-24212</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy DeWhitney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=14380#comment-24212</guid>
		<description>Whatever happend to the Plain English Amendment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever happend to the Plain English Amendment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/09/%e2%80%9cmarxo-sapiens%e2%80%9d-to-the-rescue-part-2-prepare-for-1900-pages-of-unintended-consequences/#comment-24206</link>
		<dc:creator>John Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=14380#comment-24206</guid>
		<description>There must have been a multitude of lawyers writing the bill and right there is why it is convoluted and incomprehensable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There must have been a multitude of lawyers writing the bill and right there is why it is convoluted and incomprehensable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/11/09/%e2%80%9cmarxo-sapiens%e2%80%9d-to-the-rescue-part-2-prepare-for-1900-pages-of-unintended-consequences/#comment-24211</link>
		<dc:creator>John Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=14380#comment-24211</guid>
		<description>There must have been a multitude of lawyers writing the bill and right there is why it is convoluted and incomprehensable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There must have been a multitude of lawyers writing the bill and right there is why it is convoluted and incomprehensable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

