<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr: A Conservative, not a Radical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/12/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-a-conservative-not-a-radical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/12/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-a-conservative-not-a-radical/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:34:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr: A Conservative, not a Radical &#124; NewsReal Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/12/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-a-conservative-not-a-radical/#comment-43046</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr: A Conservative, not a Radical &#124; NewsReal Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=11388#comment-43046</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ben Coultry and Ben Coultry, Robot J. McCarthy. Robot J. McCarthy said: What Zedong? RT @BenInNy Horowitz on MLK not socialist: scroll down a little - http://is.gd/6KjFk @glennbeck [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ben Coultry and Ben Coultry, Robot J. McCarthy. Robot J. McCarthy said: What Zedong? RT @BenInNy Horowitz on MLK not socialist: scroll down a little &#8211; <a href="http://is.gd/6KjFk" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/6KjFk</a> @glennbeck [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/12/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-a-conservative-not-a-radical/#comment-16838</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=11388#comment-16838</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s True....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s True&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/12/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-a-conservative-not-a-radical/#comment-16859</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=11388#comment-16859</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s True....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s True&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cee</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/12/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-a-conservative-not-a-radical/#comment-16837</link>
		<dc:creator>cee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=11388#comment-16837</guid>
		<description>it is funny in a sick sort of way, that once a person is dead and unable to speak for herself or himself as the case may be; each side rewrites history to suit that side.  King was a radical in that he wanted  a society where one would be judged by ones deeds rather than  by skin color.  He was a conservative in that he advocated non-violent means to gain the desired ends.   Kennedy was a liberal in many ways.  Kennedy was a conservative in many ways.

political parties have really polarized themselves to the point of being ridiculous.   I don&#039;t fit into either party any more.  What am I?  A woman of a certain age who believe in equal pay for equal work,  my medical decisions are between me and my physicians.  A Jew who believes that Israel must be secure in its borders with an undivided Jerusalem.  A  person with a life threatening disease whose medications cost anywhere from $500  a month to $15 for a three month supply depending on the insurance policy that one has.  I want a single payer system,  where non one would be denied care.  I have good health insurance but my adult children pay as much as I do but get  far less.   A person who believes that people should never starve to death or die from lack of health care or be uneducated.  Children are not throwaways.  The Governments, local, state, and national, are bogged down with regulations that are unwieldy, costly and contradictory in many cases.  The lobbyists should be banned, or at least severely limited to the amount of people they can employ and money that they can contribute to any thing.   elections should be limited to a set amounts,  only local people should be able to contribute to local politicians.   just as the states and local governments are forced to have a balanced budget, so should the federal government.  there should be no earmarks, there should be term limits. 8 years and let the next group in.  okay I am mostly fiscally conservative and socially liberal and progressive in that I think that we need to be green, independent of foreign industry,  grow out capacity to manufacture rather than to consume, and be personally responsible.  Also I like political debate, not personal vilification.   I don&#039;t fit into a pigeon hole.  I am ticked with all the parties.  What does that make me.?  where is my label?  and most of all why do I need to have a label</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is funny in a sick sort of way, that once a person is dead and unable to speak for herself or himself as the case may be; each side rewrites history to suit that side.  King was a radical in that he wanted  a society where one would be judged by ones deeds rather than  by skin color.  He was a conservative in that he advocated non-violent means to gain the desired ends.   Kennedy was a liberal in many ways.  Kennedy was a conservative in many ways.</p>
<p>political parties have really polarized themselves to the point of being ridiculous.   I don&#8217;t fit into either party any more.  What am I?  A woman of a certain age who believe in equal pay for equal work,  my medical decisions are between me and my physicians.  A Jew who believes that Israel must be secure in its borders with an undivided Jerusalem.  A  person with a life threatening disease whose medications cost anywhere from $500  a month to $15 for a three month supply depending on the insurance policy that one has.  I want a single payer system,  where non one would be denied care.  I have good health insurance but my adult children pay as much as I do but get  far less.   A person who believes that people should never starve to death or die from lack of health care or be uneducated.  Children are not throwaways.  The Governments, local, state, and national, are bogged down with regulations that are unwieldy, costly and contradictory in many cases.  The lobbyists should be banned, or at least severely limited to the amount of people they can employ and money that they can contribute to any thing.   elections should be limited to a set amounts,  only local people should be able to contribute to local politicians.   just as the states and local governments are forced to have a balanced budget, so should the federal government.  there should be no earmarks, there should be term limits. 8 years and let the next group in.  okay I am mostly fiscally conservative and socially liberal and progressive in that I think that we need to be green, independent of foreign industry,  grow out capacity to manufacture rather than to consume, and be personally responsible.  Also I like political debate, not personal vilification.   I don&#8217;t fit into a pigeon hole.  I am ticked with all the parties.  What does that make me.?  where is my label?  and most of all why do I need to have a label</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cee</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/12/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-a-conservative-not-a-radical/#comment-16858</link>
		<dc:creator>cee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=11388#comment-16858</guid>
		<description>it is funny in a sick sort of way, that once a person is dead and unable to speak for herself or himself as the case may be; each side rewrites history to suit that side.  King was a radical in that he wanted  a society where one would be judged by ones deeds rather than  by skin color.  He was a conservative in that he advocated non-violent means to gain the desired ends.   Kennedy was a liberal in many ways.  Kennedy was a conservative in many ways.

political parties have really polarized themselves to the point of being ridiculous.   I don&#039;t fit into either party any more.  What am I?  A woman of a certain age who believe in equal pay for equal work,  my medical decisions are between me and my physicians.  A Jew who believes that Israel must be secure in its borders with an undivided Jerusalem.  A  person with a life threatening disease whose medications cost anywhere from $500  a month to $15 for a three month supply depending on the insurance policy that one has.  I want a single payer system,  where non one would be denied care.  I have good health insurance but my adult children pay as much as I do but get  far less.   A person who believes that people should never starve to death or die from lack of health care or be uneducated.  Children are not throwaways.  The Governments, local, state, and national, are bogged down with regulations that are unwieldy, costly and contradictory in many cases.  The lobbyists should be banned, or at least severely limited to the amount of people they can employ and money that they can contribute to any thing.   elections should be limited to a set amounts,  only local people should be able to contribute to local politicians.   just as the states and local governments are forced to have a balanced budget, so should the federal government.  there should be no earmarks, there should be term limits. 8 years and let the next group in.  okay I am mostly fiscally conservative and socially liberal and progressive in that I think that we need to be green, independent of foreign industry,  grow out capacity to manufacture rather than to consume, and be personally responsible.  Also I like political debate, not personal vilification.   I don&#039;t fit into a pigeon hole.  I am ticked with all the parties.  What does that make me.?  where is my label?  and most of all why do I need to have a label</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is funny in a sick sort of way, that once a person is dead and unable to speak for herself or himself as the case may be; each side rewrites history to suit that side.  King was a radical in that he wanted  a society where one would be judged by ones deeds rather than  by skin color.  He was a conservative in that he advocated non-violent means to gain the desired ends.   Kennedy was a liberal in many ways.  Kennedy was a conservative in many ways.</p>
<p>political parties have really polarized themselves to the point of being ridiculous.   I don&#8217;t fit into either party any more.  What am I?  A woman of a certain age who believe in equal pay for equal work,  my medical decisions are between me and my physicians.  A Jew who believes that Israel must be secure in its borders with an undivided Jerusalem.  A  person with a life threatening disease whose medications cost anywhere from $500  a month to $15 for a three month supply depending on the insurance policy that one has.  I want a single payer system,  where non one would be denied care.  I have good health insurance but my adult children pay as much as I do but get  far less.   A person who believes that people should never starve to death or die from lack of health care or be uneducated.  Children are not throwaways.  The Governments, local, state, and national, are bogged down with regulations that are unwieldy, costly and contradictory in many cases.  The lobbyists should be banned, or at least severely limited to the amount of people they can employ and money that they can contribute to any thing.   elections should be limited to a set amounts,  only local people should be able to contribute to local politicians.   just as the states and local governments are forced to have a balanced budget, so should the federal government.  there should be no earmarks, there should be term limits. 8 years and let the next group in.  okay I am mostly fiscally conservative and socially liberal and progressive in that I think that we need to be green, independent of foreign industry,  grow out capacity to manufacture rather than to consume, and be personally responsible.  Also I like political debate, not personal vilification.   I don&#8217;t fit into a pigeon hole.  I am ticked with all the parties.  What does that make me.?  where is my label?  and most of all why do I need to have a label</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swathdiver</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/12/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-a-conservative-not-a-radical/#comment-16836</link>
		<dc:creator>swathdiver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=11388#comment-16836</guid>
		<description>While Horowitz didn&#039;t count King as one of them, it doesn&#039;t discount the fact that King was not a Commie, he was.  I would argue based on all the Soviet Spies in his organization that he was better connected with Moscow then the Black Panthers.  The Panthers did for a time work with King.  While he walked arm-in-arm at the front of marches, the Panthers and other Marxist thugs were further back along the sides inciting violence to sensationalize the marches for television and their cause.  Most video accounts do not show them engaging the police and onlookers but former members and some videos do show it.  I think Horowitze mentioned this tactic in one of his books, cannot remember anymore.

The values you list are Judeo-Christian values.  One does not have to be spiritual to possess, use or support them.  When I was an atheist, I still embraced many of these values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Horowitz didn&#8217;t count King as one of them, it doesn&#8217;t discount the fact that King was not a Commie, he was.  I would argue based on all the Soviet Spies in his organization that he was better connected with Moscow then the Black Panthers.  The Panthers did for a time work with King.  While he walked arm-in-arm at the front of marches, the Panthers and other Marxist thugs were further back along the sides inciting violence to sensationalize the marches for television and their cause.  Most video accounts do not show them engaging the police and onlookers but former members and some videos do show it.  I think Horowitze mentioned this tactic in one of his books, cannot remember anymore.</p>
<p>The values you list are Judeo-Christian values.  One does not have to be spiritual to possess, use or support them.  When I was an atheist, I still embraced many of these values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swathdiver</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/12/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-a-conservative-not-a-radical/#comment-16857</link>
		<dc:creator>swathdiver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=11388#comment-16857</guid>
		<description>While Horowitz didn&#039;t count King as one of them, it doesn&#039;t discount the fact that King was not a Commie, he was.  I would argue based on all the Soviet Spies in his organization that he was better connected with Moscow then the Black Panthers.  The Panthers did for a time work with King.  While he walked arm-in-arm at the front of marches, the Panthers and other Marxist thugs were further back along the sides inciting violence to sensationalize the marches for television and their cause.  Most video accounts do not show them engaging the police and onlookers but former members and some videos do show it.  I think Horowitze mentioned this tactic in one of his books, cannot remember anymore.

The values you list are Judeo-Christian values.  One does not have to be spiritual to possess, use or support them.  When I was an atheist, I still embraced many of these values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Horowitz didn&#8217;t count King as one of them, it doesn&#8217;t discount the fact that King was not a Commie, he was.  I would argue based on all the Soviet Spies in his organization that he was better connected with Moscow then the Black Panthers.  The Panthers did for a time work with King.  While he walked arm-in-arm at the front of marches, the Panthers and other Marxist thugs were further back along the sides inciting violence to sensationalize the marches for television and their cause.  Most video accounts do not show them engaging the police and onlookers but former members and some videos do show it.  I think Horowitze mentioned this tactic in one of his books, cannot remember anymore.</p>
<p>The values you list are Judeo-Christian values.  One does not have to be spiritual to possess, use or support them.  When I was an atheist, I still embraced many of these values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MLK Was No &#8220;Conservative&#8221; &#171; NewsReal Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/12/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-a-conservative-not-a-radical/#comment-16835</link>
		<dc:creator>MLK Was No &#8220;Conservative&#8221; &#171; NewsReal Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=11388#comment-16835</guid>
		<description>[...] much as I hate to take issue with my colleagues here, it is hyperbolic to call Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. a &#8220;conservative.&#8221; It is true King was no New Left radical. He had little use for Malcolm X and in his &#8220;Letter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] much as I hate to take issue with my colleagues here, it is hyperbolic to call Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. a &#8220;conservative.&#8221; It is true King was no New Left radical. He had little use for Malcolm X and in his &#8220;Letter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MLK Was No &#8220;Conservative&#8221; &#171; NewsReal Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/12/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-a-conservative-not-a-radical/#comment-16856</link>
		<dc:creator>MLK Was No &#8220;Conservative&#8221; &#171; NewsReal Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=11388#comment-16856</guid>
		<description>[...] much as I hate to take issue with my colleagues here, it is hyperbolic to call Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. a &#8220;conservative.&#8221; It is true King was no New Left radical. He had little use for Malcolm X and in his &#8220;Letter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] much as I hate to take issue with my colleagues here, it is hyperbolic to call Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. a &#8220;conservative.&#8221; It is true King was no New Left radical. He had little use for Malcolm X and in his &#8220;Letter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/12/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-a-conservative-not-a-radical/#comment-16834</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=11388#comment-16834</guid>
		<description>Dr. Martin Luther King wanted real change,to get an idea of what he really ment here&#039;s a summery of his last book(Where do we go from Here)http://www.progress.org/dividend/cdking.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Martin Luther King wanted real change,to get an idea of what he really ment here&#8217;s a summery of his last book(Where do we go from Here)http://www.progress.org/dividend/cdking.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/12/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-a-conservative-not-a-radical/#comment-16855</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=11388#comment-16855</guid>
		<description>Dr. Martin Luther King wanted real change,to get an idea of what he really ment here&#039;s a summery of his last book(Where do we go from Here)http://www.progress.org/dividend/cdking.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Martin Luther King wanted real change,to get an idea of what he really ment here&#8217;s a summery of his last book(Where do we go from Here)http://www.progress.org/dividend/cdking.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Swindle</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/12/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-a-conservative-not-a-radical/#comment-16833</link>
		<dc:creator>David Swindle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=11388#comment-16833</guid>
		<description>Horowitz was a Marxist in the &#039;60s. He and other leftists did not count King as one of them. That&#039;s the argument you&#039;re ignoring.

You did define conservatism in your post. You defined it as someone who is morally pure. And you and I are operating under different definitions of Conservatism. The &quot;constant application of Judeo-Christian values&quot; is a spiritual pursuit, not a political one.

This is how we view Conservatism at the Freedom Center:
    *  Individual Freedom
    * Rule of Law
    * Private Property
    * Limited Government
http://horowitzfreedomcenter.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horowitz was a Marxist in the &#8217;60s. He and other leftists did not count King as one of them. That&#8217;s the argument you&#8217;re ignoring.</p>
<p>You did define conservatism in your post. You defined it as someone who is morally pure. And you and I are operating under different definitions of Conservatism. The &#8220;constant application of Judeo-Christian values&#8221; is a spiritual pursuit, not a political one.</p>
<p>This is how we view Conservatism at the Freedom Center:<br />
    *  Individual Freedom<br />
    * Rule of Law<br />
    * Private Property<br />
    * Limited Government<br />
<a href="http://horowitzfreedomcenter.org/" rel="nofollow">http://horowitzfreedomcenter.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

