<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Neo-Communist Left (Michael Moore) Debates Neo-Socialist Left (Bill Maher) on Real Time, Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/07/neo-communist-left-michael-moore-debates-neo-socialist-left-bill-maher-on-real-time-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/07/neo-communist-left-michael-moore-debates-neo-socialist-left-bill-maher-on-real-time-part-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:34:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Sparrowdancer</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/07/neo-communist-left-michael-moore-debates-neo-socialist-left-bill-maher-on-real-time-part-2/#comment-15801</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Sparrowdancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10689#comment-15801</guid>
		<description>The US was supposed to be a Republic, but it descended into a state of Socialism embracing Marxist Communism with Woodrow Wilson at the helm. And he was also hiding behind the title of &quot;Progressive Democrat.&quot;  Here&#039;s the history, including minutes of Communist meetings held in NYC, (&quot;We are not fighting for co-operative commonwealths, for any abstract idea of human brotherhood.  We are fighting to enthrone ourselves in power, and after that we will see what we will do. [Applause.]&quot;
http://www.rense.com/general88/uscom.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US was supposed to be a Republic, but it descended into a state of Socialism embracing Marxist Communism with Woodrow Wilson at the helm. And he was also hiding behind the title of &#8220;Progressive Democrat.&#8221;  Here&#8217;s the history, including minutes of Communist meetings held in NYC, (&#8220;We are not fighting for co-operative commonwealths, for any abstract idea of human brotherhood.  We are fighting to enthrone ourselves in power, and after that we will see what we will do. [Applause.]&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.rense.com/general88/uscom.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.rense.com/general88/uscom.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Trevor</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/07/neo-communist-left-michael-moore-debates-neo-socialist-left-bill-maher-on-real-time-part-2/#comment-15800</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10689#comment-15800</guid>
		<description>From the New Oxford American Dictionary that is included in  Mac OS 10.

&quot;republic &#124;riËˆpÉ™blik&#124;
noun
a state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch.
â€¢ archaic figurative a community or group with a certain equality between its members.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the New Oxford American Dictionary that is included in  Mac OS 10.</p>
<p>&#8220;republic |riËˆpÉ™blik|<br />
noun<br />
a state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch.<br />
â€¢ archaic figurative a community or group with a certain equality between its members.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy Donovan</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/07/neo-communist-left-michael-moore-debates-neo-socialist-left-bill-maher-on-real-time-part-2/#comment-15799</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy Donovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10689#comment-15799</guid>
		<description>Good to see a civilized conversation between people who may disagree</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see a civilized conversation between people who may disagree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hammer</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/07/neo-communist-left-michael-moore-debates-neo-socialist-left-bill-maher-on-real-time-part-2/#comment-15798</link>
		<dc:creator>Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10689#comment-15798</guid>
		<description>&quot;The majority of people want a public health insurance option as well as the majority of doctors and nurses, so whatâ€™s the problem?&quot;

If this were true we would have had this option when Clinton was in office or there wouldnâ€™t be as much of an issue getting it now.  Many doctors and nurses are outspoken about Obama-care

&quot;The big insurance companies have far too much power and have many congressmen and even Obama in their pockets.&quot;

Then why is Obama trying to cut them out and have a public run healthcare system?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The majority of people want a public health insurance option as well as the majority of doctors and nurses, so whatâ€™s the problem?&#8221;</p>
<p>If this were true we would have had this option when Clinton was in office or there wouldnâ€™t be as much of an issue getting it now.  Many doctors and nurses are outspoken about Obama-care</p>
<p>&#8220;The big insurance companies have far too much power and have many congressmen and even Obama in their pockets.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then why is Obama trying to cut them out and have a public run healthcare system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Trevor</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/07/neo-communist-left-michael-moore-debates-neo-socialist-left-bill-maher-on-real-time-part-2/#comment-15797</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10689#comment-15797</guid>
		<description>What needs to be consistently pointed out by definition is the perils of majority rules (Democratic form of Government) and contrasted from the democratic process.

When well defined; people will see the tyranny proposed by Michael Moore et al.
Hopefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What needs to be consistently pointed out by definition is the perils of majority rules (Democratic form of Government) and contrasted from the democratic process.</p>
<p>When well defined; people will see the tyranny proposed by Michael Moore et al.<br />
Hopefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keithrage</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/07/neo-communist-left-michael-moore-debates-neo-socialist-left-bill-maher-on-real-time-part-2/#comment-15796</link>
		<dc:creator>keithrage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10689#comment-15796</guid>
		<description>They have both been in the &quot;fools&#039; list for quite some time, continual confirmation continues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have both been in the &#8220;fools&#8217; list for quite some time, continual confirmation continues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Swindle</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/07/neo-communist-left-michael-moore-debates-neo-socialist-left-bill-maher-on-real-time-part-2/#comment-15795</link>
		<dc:creator>David Swindle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 01:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10689#comment-15795</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re describing a democratic republic, which is accurate.

Watch this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7M-7LkvcVw

Do read &quot;Life Inc.&quot; and fight corporations in that fashion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re describing a democratic republic, which is accurate.</p>
<p>Watch this video:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7M-7LkvcVw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7M-7LkvcVw</a></p>
<p>Do read &#8220;Life Inc.&#8221; and fight corporations in that fashion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/07/neo-communist-left-michael-moore-debates-neo-socialist-left-bill-maher-on-real-time-part-2/#comment-15792</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 01:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10689#comment-15792</guid>
		<description>No, we have a democracy that&#039;s constrained by laws (the Constitution). The majority can enact pretty much any legislation provided it doesn&#039;t violate the constitution.

That said, I&#039;ll have to check out this Douglas Rushkoff character. That Frontline episode &quot;Merchants of Cool&quot; sounds interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, we have a democracy that&#8217;s constrained by laws (the Constitution). The majority can enact pretty much any legislation provided it doesn&#8217;t violate the constitution.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;ll have to check out this Douglas Rushkoff character. That Frontline episode &#8220;Merchants of Cool&#8221; sounds interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Swindle</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/07/neo-communist-left-michael-moore-debates-neo-socialist-left-bill-maher-on-real-time-part-2/#comment-15794</link>
		<dc:creator>David Swindle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10689#comment-15794</guid>
		<description>We aren&#039;t a democracy. (And your definition of democracy is inaccurate.) We&#039;re a republic. A democracy is a tyranny of the majority. We aren&#039;t ruled by people we&#039;re ruled by laws. In a democracy 51% of the people can vote to torture and rape the other 49% percent. That&#039;s not the system of government we have.

By all means fight corporatism. I&#039;ll stand with you for that. Just do it Douglas Rushkoff-style:
http://97.74.65.51/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=35663

-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We aren&#8217;t a democracy. (And your definition of democracy is inaccurate.) We&#8217;re a republic. A democracy is a tyranny of the majority. We aren&#8217;t ruled by people we&#8217;re ruled by laws. In a democracy 51% of the people can vote to torture and rape the other 49% percent. That&#8217;s not the system of government we have.</p>
<p>By all means fight corporatism. I&#8217;ll stand with you for that. Just do it Douglas Rushkoff-style:<br />
<a href="http://97.74.65.51/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=35663" rel="nofollow">http://97.74.65.51/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=35663</a></p>
<p>-D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/07/neo-communist-left-michael-moore-debates-neo-socialist-left-bill-maher-on-real-time-part-2/#comment-15793</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10689#comment-15793</guid>
		<description>If you define democracy as a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, we are indeed far from that ideal. What we have to a great extent is corporatism. The majority of people want a public health insurance option as well as the majority of doctors and nurses, so what&#039;s the problem? The big insurance companies have far too much power and have many congressmen and even Obama in their pockets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you define democracy as a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, we are indeed far from that ideal. What we have to a great extent is corporatism. The majority of people want a public health insurance option as well as the majority of doctors and nurses, so what&#8217;s the problem? The big insurance companies have far too much power and have many congressmen and even Obama in their pockets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

