<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Larry Kingâ€™s Dictator Trilogy â€“ The Malignant Narcissism of Hugo Chavez</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/05/larry-king-hugo-chavez/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/05/larry-king-hugo-chavez/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:34:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Swemson</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/05/larry-king-hugo-chavez/#comment-15228</link>
		<dc:creator>Swemson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 04:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10705#comment-15228</guid>
		<description>And if we&#039;re to have ANY chance at success, we have to start a full court press with every asset at our disposal right now..

Remember: The left is going to engage in the most massive amount of voter fraud of all times in the next two elections... they&#039;ve got hundreds of BILLIONS of our dollars to spend, and 90% of the lawyers and the judiciary under their thumb.

I hate to be a downer here, but I think out chances of success are slim, and that the inevitable conclusion of this will involve an armed rebellion.. I HOPE I&#039;m wrong, but doubt that I am...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if we&#8217;re to have ANY chance at success, we have to start a full court press with every asset at our disposal right now..</p>
<p>Remember: The left is going to engage in the most massive amount of voter fraud of all times in the next two elections&#8230; they&#8217;ve got hundreds of BILLIONS of our dollars to spend, and 90% of the lawyers and the judiciary under their thumb.</p>
<p>I hate to be a downer here, but I think out chances of success are slim, and that the inevitable conclusion of this will involve an armed rebellion.. I HOPE I&#8217;m wrong, but doubt that I am&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swemson</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/05/larry-king-hugo-chavez/#comment-15256</link>
		<dc:creator>Swemson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 04:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10705#comment-15256</guid>
		<description>And if we&#039;re to have ANY chance at success, we have to start a full court press with every asset at our disposal right now..

Remember: The left is going to engage in the most massive amount of voter fraud of all times in the next two elections... they&#039;ve got hundreds of BILLIONS of our dollars to spend, and 90% of the lawyers and the judiciary under their thumb.

I hate to be a downer here, but I think out chances of success are slim, and that the inevitable conclusion of this will involve an armed rebellion.. I HOPE I&#039;m wrong, but doubt that I am...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if we&#8217;re to have ANY chance at success, we have to start a full court press with every asset at our disposal right now..</p>
<p>Remember: The left is going to engage in the most massive amount of voter fraud of all times in the next two elections&#8230; they&#8217;ve got hundreds of BILLIONS of our dollars to spend, and 90% of the lawyers and the judiciary under their thumb.</p>
<p>I hate to be a downer here, but I think out chances of success are slim, and that the inevitable conclusion of this will involve an armed rebellion.. I HOPE I&#8217;m wrong, but doubt that I am&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/05/larry-king-hugo-chavez/#comment-15227</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 04:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10705#comment-15227</guid>
		<description>Swemson,
Count me in. An acquaintance that attended Pelosi&#039;s wing-ding at her winery last month told me  that Pelosi, Waxman,Reid and other supporters of strict gun control had been discussing a CC for the past two years. In effect they could modify the 2nd amendment a favorite target. Apparently Pelosi  was  strutting her stuff and proud of her accomplishments and no stranger to shooting off at the mouth. Glenn Beck touched on this briefly last year just after Obama won the presidency. Currently, we are in deep trouble with these people at the helm.Every day that goes by, I see our Constitution fading from sight. We must make demands with the next election and elect people that will serve, not subvert.I do agree with your analysis of the modifications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swemson,<br />
Count me in. An acquaintance that attended Pelosi&#8217;s wing-ding at her winery last month told me  that Pelosi, Waxman,Reid and other supporters of strict gun control had been discussing a CC for the past two years. In effect they could modify the 2nd amendment a favorite target. Apparently Pelosi  was  strutting her stuff and proud of her accomplishments and no stranger to shooting off at the mouth. Glenn Beck touched on this briefly last year just after Obama won the presidency. Currently, we are in deep trouble with these people at the helm.Every day that goes by, I see our Constitution fading from sight. We must make demands with the next election and elect people that will serve, not subvert.I do agree with your analysis of the modifications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/05/larry-king-hugo-chavez/#comment-15255</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 04:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10705#comment-15255</guid>
		<description>Swemson,
Count me in. An acquaintance that attended Pelosi&#039;s wing-ding at her winery last month told me  that Pelosi, Waxman,Reid and other supporters of strict gun control had been discussing a CC for the past two years. In effect they could modify the 2nd amendment a favorite target. Apparently Pelosi  was  strutting her stuff and proud of her accomplishments and no stranger to shooting off at the mouth. Glenn Beck touched on this briefly last year just after Obama won the presidency. Currently, we are in deep trouble with these people at the helm.Every day that goes by, I see our Constitution fading from sight. We must make demands with the next election and elect people that will serve, not subvert.I do agree with your analysis of the modifications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swemson,<br />
Count me in. An acquaintance that attended Pelosi&#8217;s wing-ding at her winery last month told me  that Pelosi, Waxman,Reid and other supporters of strict gun control had been discussing a CC for the past two years. In effect they could modify the 2nd amendment a favorite target. Apparently Pelosi  was  strutting her stuff and proud of her accomplishments and no stranger to shooting off at the mouth. Glenn Beck touched on this briefly last year just after Obama won the presidency. Currently, we are in deep trouble with these people at the helm.Every day that goes by, I see our Constitution fading from sight. We must make demands with the next election and elect people that will serve, not subvert.I do agree with your analysis of the modifications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swemson</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/05/larry-king-hugo-chavez/#comment-15226</link>
		<dc:creator>Swemson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10705#comment-15226</guid>
		<description>Judy:

I go one step further...

I say that as great as our Constitution is, the founding fathers didn&#039;t get it 100% right, as the last 50 years has amply demonstrated, so we simply MUST change the rules a bit...

Throughout history, there has always been a steady stream of megalomaniacs who were driven to seek complete power over  everyone...

Genghis Kahn, Alexander, Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin, and now Obama.. to name but a few....

We now KNOW what their tools are and how they use them, and the only chance we have of stopping this vicious cycle is to permanently make those tools unavailable to them. I say the only way to do that here and now is to hold another constitutional convention to make some changes to our Constitution in order to adjust to these times..

The first thing we must do, is insure that this permanent ruling class, that our founding fathers justifiably feared, can never be reinstated, and that involves some pretty serious term limits, as well as a broader definition of the meaning of impeachable offenses.

The second thing we need to do, is take the money out of their hands. We must permanently stop them from ever being able to use public funds to buy votes. To do this, we need some kind of a â€œFairness in Taxation Amendmentâ€.

This amendment would simply place fair and rational limitations on what our lawmakers can raise taxes for. Its primary purpose would be as said above, to prevent politicians from using, or promising to use public funds to buy votes.

The list of specific limitations on what the government could raise taxes for might look something like this.

1: It cannot be allowed to raise taxes for the purposes of income redistribution (welfare) of any kind.

2: It cannot be allowed to raise taxes to support social engineering programs such as the â€œCommunity Reinvestment Actâ€ which is the direct cause of the Sub Prime debacle that led to our current economic crisis.

3: Both federal and state governments cannot be allowed to raise taxes to fund any kind of aid other than for FEMA or other such emergency disaster relief services that no individual state could afford to pay for on its own, and when used, the funds would need to be repaid.

4: All corporate and business income taxes must be abolished. They are by far the most destructive form of taxation. The stockholders and owners of all businesses pay income taxes on the dividends and profits they receive from their companies. Why should they pay double the taxes on that income as opposed to any other form of income ? There is no better way to stimulate growth in business and the economy than to eliminate all taxes levied against profits earned by American business. Every penny of their profits that business can save will go right back into the pursuit of more profits. thatâ€™s how a free economy works. Business creates wealth. All Governments can do is spend it.

5: It would restrict existing â€œpaid inâ€ entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare from disbursing funds to anyone who has not paid into that specific program, and insure that the capital reserves of such funds would be kept segregated from the governmentâ€™s â€œgeneral operating fundsâ€.

6: It would guarantee that when tax refunds or reductions are made, that they must be returned to or accrue to the benefit of the tax payers in the same proportion to the amount that said taxpayers paid in the first place. The people who pay the most taxes, get the most benefit from tax reductions or refunds. Individuals who didnâ€™t pay any taxes cannot receive any benefit from tax reductions or refunds on those specific taxes. Thatâ€™s not a tax reduction, thatâ€™s income redistribution, aka: welfare.

Contrary to many who share the widespread common misconception, the â€œhave-notsâ€ wouldnâ€™t all just starve and die if such an amendment were passed. What would happen, is that the vast majority of them would figure out how to make a living in order to survive. The truly helpless ones will be taken care of by private charities and the church&#039;s.

The American people have always been very charitable. Americans give an average of 1.67% of our gross national product to charitable causes, unlike people in countries like The Netherlands, which give less than 0.5% of their GDP. In 2007, Americans set a record for charitable giving by donating a record $300 Billion. You can rest assured that if our taxes went down dramatically, our charitable giving will go right through the roof.. If I want to give some of my hard earned money to charity, Iâ€™ll choose which charity I give it to. Iâ€™m more likely to support music scholarships for minority groups at schools like Julliard, than to the rebuilding fund for New Orleans. That&#039;s my right simply because I EARNED THE MONEY ! The helpless will still get the help they need to survive. As Dennis Miller said, I want to help the helpless, bit I donâ€™t give a damn about the clueless.

I feel no guilt or shame when people accuse me of being cold hearted and greedy about my ideas, because I know something that they don&#039;t.. and thats the FACT that a pure free market economy is the best, indeed the ONLY way to achieve widespread prosperity for all.

So let them continue their lame attempts to denigrate capitalists as those fat little Monopoly men in black suits &amp; top hats holding large bags of cash that we see in their cartoons... They&#039;re too damn blind to understand that those guys, the prime movers &amp; leaders in a free market system, are NOT out to grab ALL THE WEALTH for themselves so that all the have-nots would starve and perish.. It&#039;s not in their self interest to do so... because if that were to happen, there would be nobody left to buy all of the products that they make and sell !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judy:</p>
<p>I go one step further&#8230;</p>
<p>I say that as great as our Constitution is, the founding fathers didn&#8217;t get it 100% right, as the last 50 years has amply demonstrated, so we simply MUST change the rules a bit&#8230;</p>
<p>Throughout history, there has always been a steady stream of megalomaniacs who were driven to seek complete power over  everyone&#8230;</p>
<p>Genghis Kahn, Alexander, Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin, and now Obama.. to name but a few&#8230;.</p>
<p>We now KNOW what their tools are and how they use them, and the only chance we have of stopping this vicious cycle is to permanently make those tools unavailable to them. I say the only way to do that here and now is to hold another constitutional convention to make some changes to our Constitution in order to adjust to these times..</p>
<p>The first thing we must do, is insure that this permanent ruling class, that our founding fathers justifiably feared, can never be reinstated, and that involves some pretty serious term limits, as well as a broader definition of the meaning of impeachable offenses.</p>
<p>The second thing we need to do, is take the money out of their hands. We must permanently stop them from ever being able to use public funds to buy votes. To do this, we need some kind of a â€œFairness in Taxation Amendmentâ€.</p>
<p>This amendment would simply place fair and rational limitations on what our lawmakers can raise taxes for. Its primary purpose would be as said above, to prevent politicians from using, or promising to use public funds to buy votes.</p>
<p>The list of specific limitations on what the government could raise taxes for might look something like this.</p>
<p>1: It cannot be allowed to raise taxes for the purposes of income redistribution (welfare) of any kind.</p>
<p>2: It cannot be allowed to raise taxes to support social engineering programs such as the â€œCommunity Reinvestment Actâ€ which is the direct cause of the Sub Prime debacle that led to our current economic crisis.</p>
<p>3: Both federal and state governments cannot be allowed to raise taxes to fund any kind of aid other than for FEMA or other such emergency disaster relief services that no individual state could afford to pay for on its own, and when used, the funds would need to be repaid.</p>
<p>4: All corporate and business income taxes must be abolished. They are by far the most destructive form of taxation. The stockholders and owners of all businesses pay income taxes on the dividends and profits they receive from their companies. Why should they pay double the taxes on that income as opposed to any other form of income ? There is no better way to stimulate growth in business and the economy than to eliminate all taxes levied against profits earned by American business. Every penny of their profits that business can save will go right back into the pursuit of more profits. thatâ€™s how a free economy works. Business creates wealth. All Governments can do is spend it.</p>
<p>5: It would restrict existing â€œpaid inâ€ entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare from disbursing funds to anyone who has not paid into that specific program, and insure that the capital reserves of such funds would be kept segregated from the governmentâ€™s â€œgeneral operating fundsâ€.</p>
<p>6: It would guarantee that when tax refunds or reductions are made, that they must be returned to or accrue to the benefit of the tax payers in the same proportion to the amount that said taxpayers paid in the first place. The people who pay the most taxes, get the most benefit from tax reductions or refunds. Individuals who didnâ€™t pay any taxes cannot receive any benefit from tax reductions or refunds on those specific taxes. Thatâ€™s not a tax reduction, thatâ€™s income redistribution, aka: welfare.</p>
<p>Contrary to many who share the widespread common misconception, the â€œhave-notsâ€ wouldnâ€™t all just starve and die if such an amendment were passed. What would happen, is that the vast majority of them would figure out how to make a living in order to survive. The truly helpless ones will be taken care of by private charities and the church&#8217;s.</p>
<p>The American people have always been very charitable. Americans give an average of 1.67% of our gross national product to charitable causes, unlike people in countries like The Netherlands, which give less than 0.5% of their GDP. In 2007, Americans set a record for charitable giving by donating a record $300 Billion. You can rest assured that if our taxes went down dramatically, our charitable giving will go right through the roof.. If I want to give some of my hard earned money to charity, Iâ€™ll choose which charity I give it to. Iâ€™m more likely to support music scholarships for minority groups at schools like Julliard, than to the rebuilding fund for New Orleans. That&#8217;s my right simply because I EARNED THE MONEY ! The helpless will still get the help they need to survive. As Dennis Miller said, I want to help the helpless, bit I donâ€™t give a damn about the clueless.</p>
<p>I feel no guilt or shame when people accuse me of being cold hearted and greedy about my ideas, because I know something that they don&#8217;t.. and thats the FACT that a pure free market economy is the best, indeed the ONLY way to achieve widespread prosperity for all.</p>
<p>So let them continue their lame attempts to denigrate capitalists as those fat little Monopoly men in black suits &amp; top hats holding large bags of cash that we see in their cartoons&#8230; They&#8217;re too damn blind to understand that those guys, the prime movers &amp; leaders in a free market system, are NOT out to grab ALL THE WEALTH for themselves so that all the have-nots would starve and perish.. It&#8217;s not in their self interest to do so&#8230; because if that were to happen, there would be nobody left to buy all of the products that they make and sell !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swemson</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/05/larry-king-hugo-chavez/#comment-15254</link>
		<dc:creator>Swemson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10705#comment-15254</guid>
		<description>Judy:

I go one step further...

I say that as great as our Constitution is, the founding fathers didn&#039;t get it 100% right, as the last 50 years has amply demonstrated, so we simply MUST change the rules a bit...

Throughout history, there has always been a steady stream of megalomaniacs who were driven to seek complete power over  everyone...

Genghis Kahn, Alexander, Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin, and now Obama.. to name but a few....

We now KNOW what their tools are and how they use them, and the only chance we have of stopping this vicious cycle is to permanently make those tools unavailable to them. I say the only way to do that here and now is to hold another constitutional convention to make some changes to our Constitution in order to adjust to these times..

The first thing we must do, is insure that this permanent ruling class, that our founding fathers justifiably feared, can never be reinstated, and that involves some pretty serious term limits, as well as a broader definition of the meaning of impeachable offenses.

The second thing we need to do, is take the money out of their hands. We must permanently stop them from ever being able to use public funds to buy votes. To do this, we need some kind of a â€œFairness in Taxation Amendmentâ€.

This amendment would simply place fair and rational limitations on what our lawmakers can raise taxes for. Its primary purpose would be as said above, to prevent politicians from using, or promising to use public funds to buy votes.

The list of specific limitations on what the government could raise taxes for might look something like this.

1: It cannot be allowed to raise taxes for the purposes of income redistribution (welfare) of any kind.

2: It cannot be allowed to raise taxes to support social engineering programs such as the â€œCommunity Reinvestment Actâ€ which is the direct cause of the Sub Prime debacle that led to our current economic crisis.

3: Both federal and state governments cannot be allowed to raise taxes to fund any kind of aid other than for FEMA or other such emergency disaster relief services that no individual state could afford to pay for on its own, and when used, the funds would need to be repaid.

4: All corporate and business income taxes must be abolished. They are by far the most destructive form of taxation. The stockholders and owners of all businesses pay income taxes on the dividends and profits they receive from their companies. Why should they pay double the taxes on that income as opposed to any other form of income ? There is no better way to stimulate growth in business and the economy than to eliminate all taxes levied against profits earned by American business. Every penny of their profits that business can save will go right back into the pursuit of more profits. thatâ€™s how a free economy works. Business creates wealth. All Governments can do is spend it.

5: It would restrict existing â€œpaid inâ€ entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare from disbursing funds to anyone who has not paid into that specific program, and insure that the capital reserves of such funds would be kept segregated from the governmentâ€™s â€œgeneral operating fundsâ€.

6: It would guarantee that when tax refunds or reductions are made, that they must be returned to or accrue to the benefit of the tax payers in the same proportion to the amount that said taxpayers paid in the first place. The people who pay the most taxes, get the most benefit from tax reductions or refunds. Individuals who didnâ€™t pay any taxes cannot receive any benefit from tax reductions or refunds on those specific taxes. Thatâ€™s not a tax reduction, thatâ€™s income redistribution, aka: welfare.

Contrary to many who share the widespread common misconception, the â€œhave-notsâ€ wouldnâ€™t all just starve and die if such an amendment were passed. What would happen, is that the vast majority of them would figure out how to make a living in order to survive. The truly helpless ones will be taken care of by private charities and the church&#039;s.

The American people have always been very charitable. Americans give an average of 1.67% of our gross national product to charitable causes, unlike people in countries like The Netherlands, which give less than 0.5% of their GDP. In 2007, Americans set a record for charitable giving by donating a record $300 Billion. You can rest assured that if our taxes went down dramatically, our charitable giving will go right through the roof.. If I want to give some of my hard earned money to charity, Iâ€™ll choose which charity I give it to. Iâ€™m more likely to support music scholarships for minority groups at schools like Julliard, than to the rebuilding fund for New Orleans. That&#039;s my right simply because I EARNED THE MONEY ! The helpless will still get the help they need to survive. As Dennis Miller said, I want to help the helpless, bit I donâ€™t give a damn about the clueless.

I feel no guilt or shame when people accuse me of being cold hearted and greedy about my ideas, because I know something that they don&#039;t.. and thats the FACT that a pure free market economy is the best, indeed the ONLY way to achieve widespread prosperity for all.

So let them continue their lame attempts to denigrate capitalists as those fat little Monopoly men in black suits &amp; top hats holding large bags of cash that we see in their cartoons... They&#039;re too damn blind to understand that those guys, the prime movers &amp; leaders in a free market system, are NOT out to grab ALL THE WEALTH for themselves so that all the have-nots would starve and perish.. It&#039;s not in their self interest to do so... because if that were to happen, there would be nobody left to buy all of the products that they make and sell !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judy:</p>
<p>I go one step further&#8230;</p>
<p>I say that as great as our Constitution is, the founding fathers didn&#8217;t get it 100% right, as the last 50 years has amply demonstrated, so we simply MUST change the rules a bit&#8230;</p>
<p>Throughout history, there has always been a steady stream of megalomaniacs who were driven to seek complete power over  everyone&#8230;</p>
<p>Genghis Kahn, Alexander, Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin, and now Obama.. to name but a few&#8230;.</p>
<p>We now KNOW what their tools are and how they use them, and the only chance we have of stopping this vicious cycle is to permanently make those tools unavailable to them. I say the only way to do that here and now is to hold another constitutional convention to make some changes to our Constitution in order to adjust to these times..</p>
<p>The first thing we must do, is insure that this permanent ruling class, that our founding fathers justifiably feared, can never be reinstated, and that involves some pretty serious term limits, as well as a broader definition of the meaning of impeachable offenses.</p>
<p>The second thing we need to do, is take the money out of their hands. We must permanently stop them from ever being able to use public funds to buy votes. To do this, we need some kind of a â€œFairness in Taxation Amendmentâ€.</p>
<p>This amendment would simply place fair and rational limitations on what our lawmakers can raise taxes for. Its primary purpose would be as said above, to prevent politicians from using, or promising to use public funds to buy votes.</p>
<p>The list of specific limitations on what the government could raise taxes for might look something like this.</p>
<p>1: It cannot be allowed to raise taxes for the purposes of income redistribution (welfare) of any kind.</p>
<p>2: It cannot be allowed to raise taxes to support social engineering programs such as the â€œCommunity Reinvestment Actâ€ which is the direct cause of the Sub Prime debacle that led to our current economic crisis.</p>
<p>3: Both federal and state governments cannot be allowed to raise taxes to fund any kind of aid other than for FEMA or other such emergency disaster relief services that no individual state could afford to pay for on its own, and when used, the funds would need to be repaid.</p>
<p>4: All corporate and business income taxes must be abolished. They are by far the most destructive form of taxation. The stockholders and owners of all businesses pay income taxes on the dividends and profits they receive from their companies. Why should they pay double the taxes on that income as opposed to any other form of income ? There is no better way to stimulate growth in business and the economy than to eliminate all taxes levied against profits earned by American business. Every penny of their profits that business can save will go right back into the pursuit of more profits. thatâ€™s how a free economy works. Business creates wealth. All Governments can do is spend it.</p>
<p>5: It would restrict existing â€œpaid inâ€ entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare from disbursing funds to anyone who has not paid into that specific program, and insure that the capital reserves of such funds would be kept segregated from the governmentâ€™s â€œgeneral operating fundsâ€.</p>
<p>6: It would guarantee that when tax refunds or reductions are made, that they must be returned to or accrue to the benefit of the tax payers in the same proportion to the amount that said taxpayers paid in the first place. The people who pay the most taxes, get the most benefit from tax reductions or refunds. Individuals who didnâ€™t pay any taxes cannot receive any benefit from tax reductions or refunds on those specific taxes. Thatâ€™s not a tax reduction, thatâ€™s income redistribution, aka: welfare.</p>
<p>Contrary to many who share the widespread common misconception, the â€œhave-notsâ€ wouldnâ€™t all just starve and die if such an amendment were passed. What would happen, is that the vast majority of them would figure out how to make a living in order to survive. The truly helpless ones will be taken care of by private charities and the church&#8217;s.</p>
<p>The American people have always been very charitable. Americans give an average of 1.67% of our gross national product to charitable causes, unlike people in countries like The Netherlands, which give less than 0.5% of their GDP. In 2007, Americans set a record for charitable giving by donating a record $300 Billion. You can rest assured that if our taxes went down dramatically, our charitable giving will go right through the roof.. If I want to give some of my hard earned money to charity, Iâ€™ll choose which charity I give it to. Iâ€™m more likely to support music scholarships for minority groups at schools like Julliard, than to the rebuilding fund for New Orleans. That&#8217;s my right simply because I EARNED THE MONEY ! The helpless will still get the help they need to survive. As Dennis Miller said, I want to help the helpless, bit I donâ€™t give a damn about the clueless.</p>
<p>I feel no guilt or shame when people accuse me of being cold hearted and greedy about my ideas, because I know something that they don&#8217;t.. and thats the FACT that a pure free market economy is the best, indeed the ONLY way to achieve widespread prosperity for all.</p>
<p>So let them continue their lame attempts to denigrate capitalists as those fat little Monopoly men in black suits &amp; top hats holding large bags of cash that we see in their cartoons&#8230; They&#8217;re too damn blind to understand that those guys, the prime movers &amp; leaders in a free market system, are NOT out to grab ALL THE WEALTH for themselves so that all the have-nots would starve and perish.. It&#8217;s not in their self interest to do so&#8230; because if that were to happen, there would be nobody left to buy all of the products that they make and sell !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/05/larry-king-hugo-chavez/#comment-15218</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10705#comment-15218</guid>
		<description>Swemson,
I don&#039;t know . It certainly meets the definition of insanity. Repeating the same behavior over and over again expecting a different outcome. I guess that there will always be a segment of this world&#039;s population that believes that they have the absolute true and perfect solution for us. You would think that through the study of world history and of the failures, we would learn. But,as In The Know said, there are always revisionists, which is prevalent today among those that would seek to change this countries history. This is why we should never give up on correcting those that seek to change the history of this country and substitute a model of America as a corrupt and destructive empire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swemson,<br />
I don&#8217;t know . It certainly meets the definition of insanity. Repeating the same behavior over and over again expecting a different outcome. I guess that there will always be a segment of this world&#8217;s population that believes that they have the absolute true and perfect solution for us. You would think that through the study of world history and of the failures, we would learn. But,as In The Know said, there are always revisionists, which is prevalent today among those that would seek to change this countries history. This is why we should never give up on correcting those that seek to change the history of this country and substitute a model of America as a corrupt and destructive empire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/05/larry-king-hugo-chavez/#comment-15246</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10705#comment-15246</guid>
		<description>Swemson,
I don&#039;t know . It certainly meets the definition of insanity. Repeating the same behavior over and over again expecting a different outcome. I guess that there will always be a segment of this world&#039;s population that believes that they have the absolute true and perfect solution for us. You would think that through the study of world history and of the failures, we would learn. But,as In The Know said, there are always revisionists, which is prevalent today among those that would seek to change this countries history. This is why we should never give up on correcting those that seek to change the history of this country and substitute a model of America as a corrupt and destructive empire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swemson,<br />
I don&#8217;t know . It certainly meets the definition of insanity. Repeating the same behavior over and over again expecting a different outcome. I guess that there will always be a segment of this world&#8217;s population that believes that they have the absolute true and perfect solution for us. You would think that through the study of world history and of the failures, we would learn. But,as In The Know said, there are always revisionists, which is prevalent today among those that would seek to change this countries history. This is why we should never give up on correcting those that seek to change the history of this country and substitute a model of America as a corrupt and destructive empire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In the know</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/05/larry-king-hugo-chavez/#comment-15225</link>
		<dc:creator>In the know</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10705#comment-15225</guid>
		<description>As many times as the watchdogs allow them to erase history and repaint it to fit their agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As many times as the watchdogs allow them to erase history and repaint it to fit their agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In the know</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/05/larry-king-hugo-chavez/#comment-15253</link>
		<dc:creator>In the know</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10705#comment-15253</guid>
		<description>As many times as the watchdogs allow them to erase history and repaint it to fit their agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As many times as the watchdogs allow them to erase history and repaint it to fit their agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swemson</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/05/larry-king-hugo-chavez/#comment-15224</link>
		<dc:creator>Swemson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10705#comment-15224</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right...

However I can&#039;t get away from one question:

How many times does the world have to go through this collectivist madness before everyone realizes that it just doesn&#039;t work.. ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right&#8230;</p>
<p>However I can&#8217;t get away from one question:</p>
<p>How many times does the world have to go through this collectivist madness before everyone realizes that it just doesn&#8217;t work.. ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swemson</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/05/larry-king-hugo-chavez/#comment-15252</link>
		<dc:creator>Swemson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10705#comment-15252</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right...

However I can&#039;t get away from one question:

How many times does the world have to go through this collectivist madness before everyone realizes that it just doesn&#039;t work.. ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right&#8230;</p>
<p>However I can&#8217;t get away from one question:</p>
<p>How many times does the world have to go through this collectivist madness before everyone realizes that it just doesn&#8217;t work.. ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

