<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSNBC: Opposing Obama&#039;s Olympic Push &quot;Rivals Jane Fonda Sitting on a Gun in North Vietnam&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/03/msnbc-opposing-obamas-olympic-push-rivals-jane-fonda-sitting-on-a-gun-in-north-vietnam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/03/msnbc-opposing-obamas-olympic-push-rivals-jane-fonda-sitting-on-a-gun-in-north-vietnam/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:34:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: What The Left Really Pledges Allegiance To &#171; NewsReal Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/03/msnbc-opposing-obamas-olympic-push-rivals-jane-fonda-sitting-on-a-gun-in-north-vietnam/#comment-14729</link>
		<dc:creator>What The Left Really Pledges Allegiance To &#171; NewsReal Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10376#comment-14729</guid>
		<description>[...] of patriotism&#8221; and insisting opposition to Obama&#8217;s myopic focus on the Chicago Olympics &#8220;rivals Jane Fonda sitting on a gun in North Vietnam,&#8221; Ed Schultz decided to talk patrotism with Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-IL, who enjoys a cozy relationship [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of patriotism&#8221; and insisting opposition to Obama&#8217;s myopic focus on the Chicago Olympics &#8220;rivals Jane Fonda sitting on a gun in North Vietnam,&#8221; Ed Schultz decided to talk patrotism with Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-IL, who enjoys a cozy relationship [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hampton</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/03/msnbc-opposing-obamas-olympic-push-rivals-jane-fonda-sitting-on-a-gun-in-north-vietnam/#comment-14691</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10376#comment-14691</guid>
		<description>Thomas
That is one of the few ways to create real change not the Commie socialist change that the Obamanites want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas<br />
That is one of the few ways to create real change not the Commie socialist change that the Obamanites want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Hibbard</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/03/msnbc-opposing-obamas-olympic-push-rivals-jane-fonda-sitting-on-a-gun-in-north-vietnam/#comment-14728</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Hibbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10376#comment-14728</guid>
		<description>Jack, I&#039;m talking about a Term Limits Initiative that was on the California Ballot. I was only minimally involved, probably just in helping to pay a few bills, as we had some campaign funds available at the time â€” so little was my involvement in fact that I don&#039;t recall any of the details. But, it was after 1990 when our Term Limits Initiative for the California State Legislature was passed by the voters.

I&#039;m thinking about getting involved in pushing for a Part Time Legislature for California in 2010. The Legislature has no sense when it comes to spending money. If you and I spent our money like the legislators in Sacramento we&#039;d be broke. And if I am to believe the media reports, that&#039;s roughly the state of things in California.

Glad you are following the subject of Term Limits in Congress. I wish more voters were paying attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack, I&#8217;m talking about a Term Limits Initiative that was on the California Ballot. I was only minimally involved, probably just in helping to pay a few bills, as we had some campaign funds available at the time â€” so little was my involvement in fact that I don&#8217;t recall any of the details. But, it was after 1990 when our Term Limits Initiative for the California State Legislature was passed by the voters.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking about getting involved in pushing for a Part Time Legislature for California in 2010. The Legislature has no sense when it comes to spending money. If you and I spent our money like the legislators in Sacramento we&#8217;d be broke. And if I am to believe the media reports, that&#8217;s roughly the state of things in California.</p>
<p>Glad you are following the subject of Term Limits in Congress. I wish more voters were paying attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hampton</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/03/msnbc-opposing-obamas-olympic-push-rivals-jane-fonda-sitting-on-a-gun-in-north-vietnam/#comment-14727</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 11:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10376#comment-14727</guid>
		<description>Thomas
 actually term limits were passed by the US congress and that great Statesman Tom Foley his butt got the boot, sued and it was overturned by the US supreme court. But I do believe there can be one written that would pass constitutional muster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas<br />
 actually term limits were passed by the US congress and that great Statesman Tom Foley his butt got the boot, sued and it was overturned by the US supreme court. But I do believe there can be one written that would pass constitutional muster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hampton</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/03/msnbc-opposing-obamas-olympic-push-rivals-jane-fonda-sitting-on-a-gun-in-north-vietnam/#comment-14726</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 11:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10376#comment-14726</guid>
		<description>Joy
For some reason that screed sounded like it came from Jean Garafalo. I would like to know how you determined that these people on the OIC are all racist and anti-Semite? Is it some new kind of meter that you posess if so where did you purchase this remarkable instrument. I am sure there decision had nothing to do with the Obama&#039;s smug presentation and decrying what a sacrifice it was to appear and there self centered concentration on there personal fame and rock star status not to mention Hoprah ate up all the good Danish pastries. I despise the UN and many of these nutty organizations but I can see where they just might be weary of the Barack and Michelle road show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joy<br />
For some reason that screed sounded like it came from Jean Garafalo. I would like to know how you determined that these people on the OIC are all racist and anti-Semite? Is it some new kind of meter that you posess if so where did you purchase this remarkable instrument. I am sure there decision had nothing to do with the Obama&#8217;s smug presentation and decrying what a sacrifice it was to appear and there self centered concentration on there personal fame and rock star status not to mention Hoprah ate up all the good Danish pastries. I despise the UN and many of these nutty organizations but I can see where they just might be weary of the Barack and Michelle road show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevroc</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/03/msnbc-opposing-obamas-olympic-push-rivals-jane-fonda-sitting-on-a-gun-in-north-vietnam/#comment-14725</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevroc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10376#comment-14725</guid>
		<description>QUOTE: &quot;Sit down in a friendly fashion with a beer and one never knows what common ground one might find.&quot;

 Are you saying that Big Ed acted &quot;stupidly&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QUOTE: &#8220;Sit down in a friendly fashion with a beer and one never knows what common ground one might find.&#8221;</p>
<p> Are you saying that Big Ed acted &#8220;stupidly&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marylou</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/03/msnbc-opposing-obamas-olympic-push-rivals-jane-fonda-sitting-on-a-gun-in-north-vietnam/#comment-14724</link>
		<dc:creator>Marylou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 22:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10376#comment-14724</guid>
		<description>Wow! so this guy (who I have only been able to watch for less than 2 minutes before I had to switch.  He&#039;s the one who yells in a gravely voice, right?), this Ed S... has had a brain bubble that switched from Blame Bush to blame the conservatives.

OK.  Simple.  Just too simple.  Incredible is right!!

So sad.  There&#039;s probably a pretty good mind in there somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! so this guy (who I have only been able to watch for less than 2 minutes before I had to switch.  He&#8217;s the one who yells in a gravely voice, right?), this Ed S&#8230; has had a brain bubble that switched from Blame Bush to blame the conservatives.</p>
<p>OK.  Simple.  Just too simple.  Incredible is right!!</p>
<p>So sad.  There&#8217;s probably a pretty good mind in there somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swemson</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/03/msnbc-opposing-obamas-olympic-push-rivals-jane-fonda-sitting-on-a-gun-in-north-vietnam/#comment-14723</link>
		<dc:creator>Swemson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10376#comment-14723</guid>
		<description>Tom wrote:

&quot;I suspect we will never see Congressional Term Limits. Spending time on that is a waste of time.&quot;

We could if we could convene a new Constitutional Convention and change a few of the rules to suit a few problems that we&#039;re currently experiencing that no reasonable person would argue that the founding fathers could have foreseen...

&quot;That said, I hope voters throw most members of Congress out of office when they vote in 2010 â€” and Iâ€™m talking about both Republicans and Democrats. Itâ€™s time to clean house.&quot;

And if we do that and DON&#039;T change a few of the rules, then we&#039;re just going to be repeating this exercise again in a few years.

Where do think the new candidates will come from and why do you assume they will be any different.... The people motivated to run for office are ALL seeking POWER OVER US !.. They will come out of the same political machines that gave us the current crop of looters, and many of the worst of the ones we get rid of, will still be drawing full pay and benefits, and they&#039;ll still be in the back rooms plotting their next moves through their surrogates...

It&#039;s not just the liars and looters that&#039;s the problem any more... It&#039;s the way we&#039;ve allowed them to subvert the basic principals that our country was founded on, and transform it into something that the founding fathers were trying to prevent... We HAVE to change a few of the rules...

This last election, &amp; the primaries leading up to it, really clarified things for me when I began to think about all of the things that people simply accepted as being the responsibility of the government to provide...I remember several occasions in which the subject of universal health care was being discussed and the reaction of the people involved when I asked the question: â€œWhat makes you think that free health care is a basic right or entitlement of some kind?â€

The answer was always something like: â€œBecause itâ€™s so important.â€ or: â€œPeople can die if they canâ€™t get good health care.â€

To which I always replied: â€œBut someone has to pay for it, nothing in life is free, and healthcare happens to be rather expensive.â€

And the reply is always the same: â€œGovernment has to pay for it.â€

Of course what they meant by that is that taxpayers like you and I have to pay for it, and not just for our own health care, but for the health care of everyone who canâ€™t afford to pay for their own, as well as those who simply prefer to spend their own money on cigarettes and junk food.

I usually exit the conversation shortly after asking the group the following question: â€œI thought you folks were a bunch of liberals, since when do you believe in slavery ?â€

This never fails to stop the conversation cold. The usual response is â€œSlavery ?  What the hell are you talking about ?â€ To which I reply: â€œWhat else would you call a system in which a small group of people are forced to work for the unearned benefit of others ?â€ (Someone much smarter than I is responsible for that line.)

To date Iâ€™ve never received an answer to that question worth repeating here.

Last night I heard a discussion on TV about the public schools failing in its duty to our children by not providing school lunches with the proper nutritional content... Was I the only listener who wondered, where the hell did anyone get the idea that it was their responsibility to feed them in the first place? When I was in school, we all brought our lunch from home.. Is there even such a thing as a lunch box anymore ? Sure.. some ate better than others... that&#039;s the way it is in the real world.

Whatever happened to the idea that the parents were responsible for the health &amp; welfare of their kids ?

The more the govt does for the people, the less free and independent the people become.

We MUST put a stop to the spread of this cancer which is tearing our republic down !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;I suspect we will never see Congressional Term Limits. Spending time on that is a waste of time.&#8221;</p>
<p>We could if we could convene a new Constitutional Convention and change a few of the rules to suit a few problems that we&#8217;re currently experiencing that no reasonable person would argue that the founding fathers could have foreseen&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;That said, I hope voters throw most members of Congress out of office when they vote in 2010 â€” and Iâ€™m talking about both Republicans and Democrats. Itâ€™s time to clean house.&#8221;</p>
<p>And if we do that and DON&#8217;T change a few of the rules, then we&#8217;re just going to be repeating this exercise again in a few years.</p>
<p>Where do think the new candidates will come from and why do you assume they will be any different&#8230;. The people motivated to run for office are ALL seeking POWER OVER US !.. They will come out of the same political machines that gave us the current crop of looters, and many of the worst of the ones we get rid of, will still be drawing full pay and benefits, and they&#8217;ll still be in the back rooms plotting their next moves through their surrogates&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not just the liars and looters that&#8217;s the problem any more&#8230; It&#8217;s the way we&#8217;ve allowed them to subvert the basic principals that our country was founded on, and transform it into something that the founding fathers were trying to prevent&#8230; We HAVE to change a few of the rules&#8230;</p>
<p>This last election, &amp; the primaries leading up to it, really clarified things for me when I began to think about all of the things that people simply accepted as being the responsibility of the government to provide&#8230;I remember several occasions in which the subject of universal health care was being discussed and the reaction of the people involved when I asked the question: â€œWhat makes you think that free health care is a basic right or entitlement of some kind?â€</p>
<p>The answer was always something like: â€œBecause itâ€™s so important.â€ or: â€œPeople can die if they canâ€™t get good health care.â€</p>
<p>To which I always replied: â€œBut someone has to pay for it, nothing in life is free, and healthcare happens to be rather expensive.â€</p>
<p>And the reply is always the same: â€œGovernment has to pay for it.â€</p>
<p>Of course what they meant by that is that taxpayers like you and I have to pay for it, and not just for our own health care, but for the health care of everyone who canâ€™t afford to pay for their own, as well as those who simply prefer to spend their own money on cigarettes and junk food.</p>
<p>I usually exit the conversation shortly after asking the group the following question: â€œI thought you folks were a bunch of liberals, since when do you believe in slavery ?â€</p>
<p>This never fails to stop the conversation cold. The usual response is â€œSlavery ?  What the hell are you talking about ?â€ To which I reply: â€œWhat else would you call a system in which a small group of people are forced to work for the unearned benefit of others ?â€ (Someone much smarter than I is responsible for that line.)</p>
<p>To date Iâ€™ve never received an answer to that question worth repeating here.</p>
<p>Last night I heard a discussion on TV about the public schools failing in its duty to our children by not providing school lunches with the proper nutritional content&#8230; Was I the only listener who wondered, where the hell did anyone get the idea that it was their responsibility to feed them in the first place? When I was in school, we all brought our lunch from home.. Is there even such a thing as a lunch box anymore ? Sure.. some ate better than others&#8230; that&#8217;s the way it is in the real world.</p>
<p>Whatever happened to the idea that the parents were responsible for the health &amp; welfare of their kids ?</p>
<p>The more the govt does for the people, the less free and independent the people become.</p>
<p>We MUST put a stop to the spread of this cancer which is tearing our republic down !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doberman2</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/03/msnbc-opposing-obamas-olympic-push-rivals-jane-fonda-sitting-on-a-gun-in-north-vietnam/#comment-14722</link>
		<dc:creator>doberman2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10376#comment-14722</guid>
		<description>So now we&#039;re compaired to Stalinists?
 Kinda like the proverbial pot calling the kettle black, eh?
 DOESN&#039;T THIS CLOWN EVEN DO HIS HOMEWORK?
 So far, this administration is neck and neck to the Clinton administration in the corruption arena, and it&#039;s only been 9 months!!!

 QUESTION; How much room will be left under the bus at the end of Community Organizer Obama&#039;s term in office?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now we&#8217;re compaired to Stalinists?<br />
 Kinda like the proverbial pot calling the kettle black, eh?<br />
 DOESN&#8217;T THIS CLOWN EVEN DO HIS HOMEWORK?<br />
 So far, this administration is neck and neck to the Clinton administration in the corruption arena, and it&#8217;s only been 9 months!!!</p>
<p> QUESTION; How much room will be left under the bus at the end of Community Organizer Obama&#8217;s term in office?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Hibbard</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/03/msnbc-opposing-obamas-olympic-push-rivals-jane-fonda-sitting-on-a-gun-in-north-vietnam/#comment-14721</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Hibbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 16:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10376#comment-14721</guid>
		<description>A few years ago, after voters approved Term Limits for the California State Legislature and other state officials, like the governor, they approved a similar ballot initiative to limit terms of California members of Congress. The law, as I recall, was ruled unconstitutional. Bottom line: I suspect we will never see Congressional Term Limits. Spending time on that is a waste of time.

While I was involved in getting the 1990 California Term Limits Initiative passed, I&#039;m ambivalent about a similar law for Congress. I won&#039;t go into the rationale here. That said, I hope voters throw most members of Congress out of office when they vote in 2010 â€” and I&#039;m talking about both Republicans and Democrats. It&#039;s time to clean house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few years ago, after voters approved Term Limits for the California State Legislature and other state officials, like the governor, they approved a similar ballot initiative to limit terms of California members of Congress. The law, as I recall, was ruled unconstitutional. Bottom line: I suspect we will never see Congressional Term Limits. Spending time on that is a waste of time.</p>
<p>While I was involved in getting the 1990 California Term Limits Initiative passed, I&#8217;m ambivalent about a similar law for Congress. I won&#8217;t go into the rationale here. That said, I hope voters throw most members of Congress out of office when they vote in 2010 â€” and I&#8217;m talking about both Republicans and Democrats. It&#8217;s time to clean house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/03/msnbc-opposing-obamas-olympic-push-rivals-jane-fonda-sitting-on-a-gun-in-north-vietnam/#comment-14720</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 16:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10376#comment-14720</guid>
		<description>Kudos to Collete &amp; Judy for spot-on observations about the Obamanation - there were many forces at work to groom this Manchurian Candidate.

I&#039;m just old enough to recall the OLD IOC - i.e., the old farts who made up this very exclusive and dictatorial committee of elites.  Avery (??) Bundidge or some name like that (with the aforementioned age comes memory lapse, sad but true...) was absolute &quot;dictator&quot; among this very WASPish group of MEN - NO women; and, as the old saying goes, &quot;No Jews or Japs need apply!&quot; As for African-Americans, well, fegheddaboutit!  They weren&#039;t even on the radar of those aforementioned WASP anti-Semite racists.

The point is, even in this supposedly &quot;enlightened&quot; age and with more &quot;people of color&quot; (I HATE that PC expression!) rightfully taking their respective places in various rungs of the ruling hierarchy, the IOC still, gentically, clings to its racist/anti-semitic/exclusivity past - even the newer members represent some aspect of that old, out-dated ruling elite from all corners of the globe.  I think different skin pigmentations have made it onto the IOC, but in a very carefully orchestrated &amp; controlled manner.   This is truly a case of a small group of totally UN-elected elites ruling a very powerful, world-wide IDEA - the arena of international spots competition.  Now, of course, this power includes and is welcome to tons of monetary &amp; other bribes/perks - however one wishes to characterize them.  And by having Olympics competitions every Two years now (Summer &amp; Winter), instead of the original four-year intervals, these corrupted and corruptible bastards are guaranteed mucho hashish....

Back to Copenhagen, Chicago, the Obamas, Oprah and the IOC:  If ever there were a clash of oil &amp; water, this one was the perfect storm:  &quot;Uppity Blacks&quot; trying to shill for a corrupted village of human types below the stuffy, patrician gaze of these self-important elites, was a recipe bound for disaster.  Of course, money &amp; power blinded the Obamas &amp; Oprah from the fundamental truth of an international cabel of life-long racists.  Everyone seems to have missed this point; they just assumed that the IOC joined the rest of the world in a more enlighted perspective with the dawn of the 21st century.  NOT!  Take off your rose-colored glasses and see what is Truth in the Real World.  No amount of spin or self-congratulatory appraisals will defeat an ingrained system of elitism &amp; racism - which is the REAL face of the IOC.

The Obamas and their minions were totally blinded and fooled by the outward civility of the IOC (quite a few has-been titles are usually among the lot); from the get-go, they (the Obamas) were NOT part of the equation.  Perhaps had a resurrected John McCormick or some other old-style (and dead) Chicago power elite dominated the application process, the outcome MIGHT have been different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos to Collete &amp; Judy for spot-on observations about the Obamanation &#8211; there were many forces at work to groom this Manchurian Candidate.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just old enough to recall the OLD IOC &#8211; i.e., the old farts who made up this very exclusive and dictatorial committee of elites.  Avery (??) Bundidge or some name like that (with the aforementioned age comes memory lapse, sad but true&#8230;) was absolute &#8220;dictator&#8221; among this very WASPish group of MEN &#8211; NO women; and, as the old saying goes, &#8220;No Jews or Japs need apply!&#8221; As for African-Americans, well, fegheddaboutit!  They weren&#8217;t even on the radar of those aforementioned WASP anti-Semite racists.</p>
<p>The point is, even in this supposedly &#8220;enlightened&#8221; age and with more &#8220;people of color&#8221; (I HATE that PC expression!) rightfully taking their respective places in various rungs of the ruling hierarchy, the IOC still, gentically, clings to its racist/anti-semitic/exclusivity past &#8211; even the newer members represent some aspect of that old, out-dated ruling elite from all corners of the globe.  I think different skin pigmentations have made it onto the IOC, but in a very carefully orchestrated &amp; controlled manner.   This is truly a case of a small group of totally UN-elected elites ruling a very powerful, world-wide IDEA &#8211; the arena of international spots competition.  Now, of course, this power includes and is welcome to tons of monetary &amp; other bribes/perks &#8211; however one wishes to characterize them.  And by having Olympics competitions every Two years now (Summer &amp; Winter), instead of the original four-year intervals, these corrupted and corruptible bastards are guaranteed mucho hashish&#8230;.</p>
<p>Back to Copenhagen, Chicago, the Obamas, Oprah and the IOC:  If ever there were a clash of oil &amp; water, this one was the perfect storm:  &#8220;Uppity Blacks&#8221; trying to shill for a corrupted village of human types below the stuffy, patrician gaze of these self-important elites, was a recipe bound for disaster.  Of course, money &amp; power blinded the Obamas &amp; Oprah from the fundamental truth of an international cabel of life-long racists.  Everyone seems to have missed this point; they just assumed that the IOC joined the rest of the world in a more enlighted perspective with the dawn of the 21st century.  NOT!  Take off your rose-colored glasses and see what is Truth in the Real World.  No amount of spin or self-congratulatory appraisals will defeat an ingrained system of elitism &amp; racism &#8211; which is the REAL face of the IOC.</p>
<p>The Obamas and their minions were totally blinded and fooled by the outward civility of the IOC (quite a few has-been titles are usually among the lot); from the get-go, they (the Obamas) were NOT part of the equation.  Perhaps had a resurrected John McCormick or some other old-style (and dead) Chicago power elite dominated the application process, the outcome MIGHT have been different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hampton</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/03/msnbc-opposing-obamas-olympic-push-rivals-jane-fonda-sitting-on-a-gun-in-north-vietnam/#comment-14719</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 12:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=10376#comment-14719</guid>
		<description>Saoirse
I do not believe that the gentlemans coment inferred that he wanted to see them drug out and dumped in a gulag which is what they would do to some of the more sensible comentators that they disagree with. I also do not think it is wrong if the American people vote with there pocket books and time and do not watch people like Sergeant Schultz or Katie Curic and there feeble propaganda arm dies on the vine so to speak in the hope it is replaced by a more honest one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saoirse<br />
I do not believe that the gentlemans coment inferred that he wanted to see them drug out and dumped in a gulag which is what they would do to some of the more sensible comentators that they disagree with. I also do not think it is wrong if the American people vote with there pocket books and time and do not watch people like Sergeant Schultz or Katie Curic and there feeble propaganda arm dies on the vine so to speak in the hope it is replaced by a more honest one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

