Comments on: Artificial Sweetener: A Second Round of ACORN Covering Fire, a Defense From Our Childhood

By: Artificial Sweetener: A Second Round of ACORN Covering Fire, a … | Acorn Issues

Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:52:39 +0000

[...] See the original post: Artificial Sweetener: A Second Round of ACORN Covering Fire, a … [...]

By: Tim and Alissa Birkel Call Out Rachel Maddow’s Spoonful of Leftism « NewsReal Blog

Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:53:21 +0000

[...] Part 5: A Second Round of ACORN Covering Fire, a Defense From OurÂ Childhood [...]

By: In the know

In the know — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:41:01 +0000

Bill Clinton is a Rhodes Scholar. Our actions define our character, not a piece of paper. Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, were not mental midgets either. How many proud individuals have awards and accolades bestowed by them? Are they regarded as intelligent therefore unquestionable? GW went to Yale. Did that stop the neo communists? They disregard logic when it is used against them and then selectively use it to against their critics.

By: Jack Hampton

Jack Hampton — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:33:20 +0000

The problem is that Maddow is in the tank for the Obama administration just like everyone at NBC because there parent company has a moneyed interest in his legislation that he wishs to pass Crap& Trade they stand to make a fortune off of it. Now that is what the FCC should be investigating.

By: john

john — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:31:12 +0000

They did some bad but they did some good to? That’s a defence? This whole thing has spiritual implications. Satan for example is known as the Father of lies. He’s very good at it. What he does is take some truth and mix it with a lie, that way it doesn’t look bad, but if you disect it you will find that whatever truth is in it was compromised but a lie turning the whole thing into a lie Arrange a cow patty just the right way, paint it up a little, add some perfume or false smell and it might look good but one bite will tell you for sure it’s not what it appears to be, so is ACORN and acorn is not the only one.

By: Geppetto

Geppetto — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:15:27 +0000

How can any reasonably intelligent, thoughtful, logical person watch the ACORN videos and conclude that the “prostitute,” the “pimp” and the conservative media are the most evil, vile, devious individuals on the planet?

I would agree with pbrauer…..Rachael Maddow probably has all the necessary credentials to prove that she is an extremely well educated intellectual having all the credentials necessary to place her on the looney left. It takes extremely convoluted reasoning, the more illogical the better, to completely confuse those of us struggling with the disability of our normal inteligence, to arrive at conclusions designed to stun and subdue us with their elusive intellectual nuances.

Then there are those of us who recognize it for what it is………B.S.

By: David Swindle

David Swindle — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:11:49 +0000

This rude, ad hominem attack is the straw that has broken the camel’s back. It’s off topic and contributes nothing to the discussion — as is characteristic of almost all of Pbrauer’s posts. I’ve had enough.

By: politicalmoxie

politicalmoxie — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:50:25 +0000

I tuned in to the Friday Maddow show. I wanted to see if Peter Dreier was again opining. No Dreier AND his name was not mentioned. Peter Dreier, the altruistic defender of ACORN and those they unselfishly
serve. Do you think she was told the history of Peter Dreier? His whinning diatribe on the Huff Post Friday was tedious. After 10 seconds of scrolling, I did not care who “they” had come for and who the Democrats had failed to defend.
I loved your analogy of children saying “they did it too”. Simply put, Maddows’ show does border on childishness. For heavens’sake this woman is a Rhodes Scholar. I “HAD” always thought that was an honor to be admired, even though I do know several ivy league graduates who are idiots.
I think Maddows’ been short changed in common sense and charm, but almost all hosts on MSNBC suffer that affliction. It must be a requirement for employment at that network.

By: pbrauer

pbrauer — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:34:41 +0000

LOL. I suppose at times I can be a little dense, but I finally realized what your Schick really is. As “creative writers” you aim to portray Dr. Maddow as an ignorant childlike figure that makes outlandish claims to demonize conservatives. That simply isnâ€™t the case. Dr. Maddow is extremely intelligent and is a force to be reckoned with and ‘creative writers’ such as yourselves will never win in the end. I must say, I do like the cartoons you guys pick, very funny.

Here is Dr. Maddow’s educational background From Wikipedia:
Maddow earned a degree in public policy from Stanford University in 1994. At graduation she was awarded the John Gardner Fellowship. She was also the recipient of a Rhodes Scholarship and began her postgraduate study in 1995 at Lincoln College, Oxford. In 2001, she completed her Doctor of Philosophy degree (styled a DPhil) in politics from the University of Oxford.

You might want to take Sunday afternoon and read the following piece:
.The Dr. Maddow Show

I can hardly wait until next creative ‘Artificial Sweetener’ concoction you guys write, it should be a doozy.
Isn’t Google such a great research tool?

By: j c original

j c original — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:26:04 +0000

I’ve never watched maddow but I do appreciate Tim & Alissa’s commentary. One question: What state governments(governor’s) are not investigating and/or prosecuting acorn’s voter fraud,mixing taxpayer monies with election agenda’s, This should be a major issue in every state where they operate.Is there a state scorecard available? I figure the far-left is hoping this acorn issue blows away before 2010.
Remember acorn has many tenacles or front organizations and we need very deep investigations to expose and prosecute. Daily sunlight is needed on this extremely important issue. Thanks

By: jbtrevor

jbtrevor — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 01:39:26 +0000

Just imagine, one day there will be no more ACORN, ahhh