<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Illegal Aliens and the Border Fence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/09/19/8729/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/09/19/8729/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:10:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Aluminum Fence</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/09/19/8729/#comment-50633</link>
		<dc:creator>Aluminum Fence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=8729#comment-50633</guid>
		<description>I think we need a fence and I think its needs to happen now... why waste money  on the car companies when we can use it on a fence. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we need a fence and I think its needs to happen now&#8230; why waste money  on the car companies when we can use it on a fence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marylou</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/09/19/8729/#comment-34932</link>
		<dc:creator>Marylou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 02:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=8729#comment-34932</guid>
		<description>I think I get it.  We are the bad guys, once again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I get it.  We are the bad guys, once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/09/19/8729/#comment-34916</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=8729#comment-34916</guid>
		<description>They shouldn&#039;t have to maintain the fence, but they should be forced to build it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They shouldn&#8217;t have to maintain the fence, but they should be forced to build it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/09/19/8729/#comment-34913</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=8729#comment-34913</guid>
		<description>A 14-mile fence separating San Diego from Tijuana. By 2005, security barriers stretched along at least seventy miles of the border. Recognizing the success of the San Diego corridor barrier, Congress passed the Secure Fence Act of 2006 mandating the construction of 700 miles of border fence along the Mexico border including â€œtwo layers of reinforced fencing and listed five specific sections of border where it should be installed. Just before Christmas 2007, Congress passed an Omnibus spending bill that removed the two-tier requirement and the list of locations specified. Also, an additional kicker was slipped into the bill, the Hutchinson Amendment which allowed the secretary of DHS to not build the fence anywhere he deemed it inappropriate.

Okay, why not the whole southern border first? I&#039;m not being racist, but realistic. There&#039;s far more violence in the south than the north.


Although, I am biased on this issue with Cuban Nationals. They came from an island surrounded by water in extremely harsh conditions. Cuban travel for all citizens should be lifted immediately. 

Cuban and American economic gains could benefit a great deal. We&#039;ve had a trade embargo with them for almost half a century. Are they violent towards us? Are we at war with them? Or did someone&#039;s feelings get hurt and this is their punishment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 14-mile fence separating San Diego from Tijuana. By 2005, security barriers stretched along at least seventy miles of the border. Recognizing the success of the San Diego corridor barrier, Congress passed the Secure Fence Act of 2006 mandating the construction of 700 miles of border fence along the Mexico border including â€œtwo layers of reinforced fencing and listed five specific sections of border where it should be installed. Just before Christmas 2007, Congress passed an Omnibus spending bill that removed the two-tier requirement and the list of locations specified. Also, an additional kicker was slipped into the bill, the Hutchinson Amendment which allowed the secretary of DHS to not build the fence anywhere he deemed it inappropriate.</p>
<p>Okay, why not the whole southern border first? I&#8217;m not being racist, but realistic. There&#8217;s far more violence in the south than the north.</p>
<p>Although, I am biased on this issue with Cuban Nationals. They came from an island surrounded by water in extremely harsh conditions. Cuban travel for all citizens should be lifted immediately. </p>
<p>Cuban and American economic gains could benefit a great deal. We&#8217;ve had a trade embargo with them for almost half a century. Are they violent towards us? Are we at war with them? Or did someone&#8217;s feelings get hurt and this is their punishment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/09/19/8729/#comment-34912</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=8729#comment-34912</guid>
		<description>We are also a Nation built on laws. 

If we have a law, either enforce it or get rid of it. 

I personally see the investment of deporting all illegals based on the amount spent on them at the tax-payer&#039;s expense rather than the amount this country gains from them, as the right thing to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are also a Nation built on laws. </p>
<p>If we have a law, either enforce it or get rid of it. </p>
<p>I personally see the investment of deporting all illegals based on the amount spent on them at the tax-payer&#8217;s expense rather than the amount this country gains from them, as the right thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/09/19/8729/#comment-34911</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=8729#comment-34911</guid>
		<description>Legalize marijuana and make it taxable to grow, and illegal to sell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legalize marijuana and make it taxable to grow, and illegal to sell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/09/19/8729/#comment-34910</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=8729#comment-34910</guid>
		<description>Legalize marijuana and it has no value. Pay an annual tax to grow it, it&#039;d be illegal to try to sell marijuana. The marijuana black market might vanish, but the push to Enforce stronger pressure on hard drug dealers should increase. All non-violent drug offenders with misdemeanor offenses should be released. Freeing up our prisons and jails, not incurring unnecessary cost; and some will say profit; and focusing on the more serious offenses in this country.


This country at the very least should recommend treatment in the court systems before jails/prisons if you are found breaking the law for a petty drug crime. 

I agree with you though, hard drug use for the majority of people who use them, have a problem, destroy their lives, and usually nearly everyone in connection with them sees the dark side of addiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legalize marijuana and it has no value. Pay an annual tax to grow it, it&#8217;d be illegal to try to sell marijuana. The marijuana black market might vanish, but the push to Enforce stronger pressure on hard drug dealers should increase. All non-violent drug offenders with misdemeanor offenses should be released. Freeing up our prisons and jails, not incurring unnecessary cost; and some will say profit; and focusing on the more serious offenses in this country.</p>
<p>This country at the very least should recommend treatment in the court systems before jails/prisons if you are found breaking the law for a petty drug crime. </p>
<p>I agree with you though, hard drug use for the majority of people who use them, have a problem, destroy their lives, and usually nearly everyone in connection with them sees the dark side of addiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/09/19/8729/#comment-34907</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=8729#comment-34907</guid>
		<description>BBC: 2009 February - Reports say about 1,000 people died in a further upsurge in drug-related violence in the first six weeks of 2009.

*

Once denied healthcare for not having proof of being an American citizen, you are turned away. I know that&#039;s harsh, but it would stop the downward spiral. 

We don&#039;t need a National ID Card. 

I have mixed feelings on the U.S. and Mexico&#039;s &quot;War on Drugs&quot;, but the violence in Mexico has increased despite what (our) tax dollars, military equipment and personnel we have gifted Mexico, and there is more violence in our border towns. 

Wikipedia: Drug cartels in Mexico control approximately 70% of the foreign narcotics that flow into the United States. 

Although, if we decriminalize marijuana, free-up our prisons of non-violent offenders,  legalize medicinal use, and protect the doctor&#039;s decision to prescribe it without fear of retribution. Marijuana would have little value on the black market. 

The Government could tax it, it would be free to grow, and you couldn&#039;t sell it. Growers could qualify for tax credits if they are caregivers to a patient needing his service. Insurance companies can&#039;t deny coverage.  Which in turn would create more bureaucracy. 

The street violence for marijuana sales would plummet. Robberies would probably increase seeing how they are growing marijuana. Harder drugs would be sky rocket in price, there&#039;d be greater law enforcement concentrated on them, but if they only concentrated on the dealers, and not the users I think the world could quite possibly be a bit more peaceful.

Mexican drug cartels pushing cocaine should be targets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BBC: 2009 February &#8211; Reports say about 1,000 people died in a further upsurge in drug-related violence in the first six weeks of 2009.</p>
<p>*</p>
<p>Once denied healthcare for not having proof of being an American citizen, you are turned away. I know that&#8217;s harsh, but it would stop the downward spiral. </p>
<p>We don&#8217;t need a National ID Card. </p>
<p>I have mixed feelings on the U.S. and Mexico&#8217;s &#8220;War on Drugs&#8221;, but the violence in Mexico has increased despite what (our) tax dollars, military equipment and personnel we have gifted Mexico, and there is more violence in our border towns. </p>
<p>Wikipedia: Drug cartels in Mexico control approximately 70% of the foreign narcotics that flow into the United States. </p>
<p>Although, if we decriminalize marijuana, free-up our prisons of non-violent offenders,  legalize medicinal use, and protect the doctor&#8217;s decision to prescribe it without fear of retribution. Marijuana would have little value on the black market. </p>
<p>The Government could tax it, it would be free to grow, and you couldn&#8217;t sell it. Growers could qualify for tax credits if they are caregivers to a patient needing his service. Insurance companies can&#8217;t deny coverage.  Which in turn would create more bureaucracy. </p>
<p>The street violence for marijuana sales would plummet. Robberies would probably increase seeing how they are growing marijuana. Harder drugs would be sky rocket in price, there&#8217;d be greater law enforcement concentrated on them, but if they only concentrated on the dealers, and not the users I think the world could quite possibly be a bit more peaceful.</p>
<p>Mexican drug cartels pushing cocaine should be targets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/09/19/8729/#comment-34896</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=8729#comment-34896</guid>
		<description>I agree with you 100%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you 100%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/09/19/8729/#comment-34895</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=8729#comment-34895</guid>
		<description>I think we electrify the border fences, electrified on the Mexican Border, and have a second neutral fence between the electricity on the U.S. side, signs on both sides with the native language, and deport everyone who is here illegally.

This country has lost billions in tax revenue and will continue to do so, and that&#039;s not okay!! In turn, our ratesgo up. Illegal immigrants drag our hospitals down financially, they do cheaper labor compared to Americans for under-the-table wages, send &quot;untaxed&quot; money back to their native country. The person who employed them should face a heavy fine and business license suspension, like a DUI consequence. I&#039;m not blaming Mexico directly, but Canadians don&#039;t seem to be barging into our country, using our country&#039;s well-mannered humanitarian effort (at our cost) when they use our services.

I think it&#039;s wrong. Clearly the beginning paragraph seems unappoligetic and wrong, but &quot;How many President&#039;s have given amnesty to millions&quot;? Historically, California has been a target. Reported by Dateline: December, 2004   Illegal Immigration Costs California Over Ten Billion Annually.

California&#039;s already struggling K-12 education system spends approximately $7.7 billion a year to school the children of illegal aliens who now constitute 15 percent of the student body. Another $1.4 billion of the taxpayers&#039; money goes toward providing health care to illegal aliens and their families, the same amount that is spent incarcerating illegal aliens criminals.

July 10, 2009, LATimes, To save money, activists may try to cut aid for U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants. 

If we have laws we don&#039;t enforce, they shouldn&#039;t be laws.

Montana has instances where the illegals take skilled construction employment away from us.. 

Washington needs to step it up!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we electrify the border fences, electrified on the Mexican Border, and have a second neutral fence between the electricity on the U.S. side, signs on both sides with the native language, and deport everyone who is here illegally.</p>
<p>This country has lost billions in tax revenue and will continue to do so, and that&#8217;s not okay!! In turn, our ratesgo up. Illegal immigrants drag our hospitals down financially, they do cheaper labor compared to Americans for under-the-table wages, send &#8220;untaxed&#8221; money back to their native country. The person who employed them should face a heavy fine and business license suspension, like a DUI consequence. I&#8217;m not blaming Mexico directly, but Canadians don&#8217;t seem to be barging into our country, using our country&#8217;s well-mannered humanitarian effort (at our cost) when they use our services.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s wrong. Clearly the beginning paragraph seems unappoligetic and wrong, but &#8220;How many President&#8217;s have given amnesty to millions&#8221;? Historically, California has been a target. Reported by Dateline: December, 2004   Illegal Immigration Costs California Over Ten Billion Annually.</p>
<p>California&#8217;s already struggling K-12 education system spends approximately $7.7 billion a year to school the children of illegal aliens who now constitute 15 percent of the student body. Another $1.4 billion of the taxpayers&#8217; money goes toward providing health care to illegal aliens and their families, the same amount that is spent incarcerating illegal aliens criminals.</p>
<p>July 10, 2009, LATimes, To save money, activists may try to cut aid for U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants. </p>
<p>If we have laws we don&#8217;t enforce, they shouldn&#8217;t be laws.</p>
<p>Montana has instances where the illegals take skilled construction employment away from us.. </p>
<p>Washington needs to step it up!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brittanicus</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/09/19/8729/#comment-10771</link>
		<dc:creator>brittanicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=8729#comment-10771</guid>
		<description>Nothing is a 100 percent perfect and that goes for the government application E-Verify? The answer for any irate hired worker is simple, that if the employer is not satisfied with the results of the immigration verification identity process? You take a copy of your 1-9 form to the Social security agency, to resolve the issue? YOU WILL OBVIOUSLY NOT APPEAR BEFORE AN AGENT OF THE GOVERNMENT, IF YOU HAVE NO AUTHENTIC PAPERS? This is not a complex approach to the problem, although the US Chamber of Commerce, ACLU and a multitude of detrimental businesses have tried to escalate this situation? They say categorically nothing about how to rectify the matter, owing to their main objective is to demonize the process any way they can? Even their adolescent attitude of filing some frivolous lawsuit with the courts fell through?

E-Verification--MUST--become a permanent law, not just subject to an employerâ€™s whim?  The public who savor their jobs not being appropriated by foreign workers--AS HAPPENED IN EUROPE--should demand E-Verify in every industry, every business with heavy penalties for those who rebuke the law including mandatory jail sentences. EUROPE over several decades has also been  overwhelmed by legal and illegal immigrants, thats why health care across the Atlantic has become compromised?   E-Verify could be easily expanded for many other uses in the US, including admittance to health care, drivers licenses, government subsidies that would include education and home mortgages?

But we must remain vigilant as the status quo has in their influence a group of stalwart politicians. They have secretly conspired to table E-Verify in the past and will no doubt try to eradicate it&#039;s accessibility in the future. Hundreds of pariah businesses are devoid of a conscious towards the American working man or woman. They have corrupted the lawmakers in Washington, with special interest money and extravagant favors. They have already indoctrinated some of our previously honest leaders with favors and in return we have seen the weakening of 287 G police training apprehension of illegal immigrants. Already President Obama has listened to Sen.Harry Reid D-NV, California&#039;s own Nancy Pelosi and Napolitano who have weakened other enforcement laws. NO! Innocent children of illegal immigrants who were transplanted by their parents here are not to blame. Our borders have remained like sieves, thanks to  some of the  lawmakers whom we voted for over the years. Legislators are ultimately culpable as they make the decisions, as by inheritance of each administration  who  resides in the White House?

Money was wasted on building the single length border fence instead of Rep.Duncan Hunters planned two-tier barrier as in San Diego?  ICE raids have been reduced and even the No-match-rescinded. More money is wasted overturning enforcement laws, instead of using the full force of these procedures in combating the illegal immigrant invasion.  IF YOU HAVE SOME SOLID KNOWLEDGE OF ILLEGAL WORKERS, CONTACT ICE!  ADDRESS YOUR POLITICIANS AT 202-224-3121 NO MORE COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION REFORM! IT IS NOT IN THE COUNTRIES INTEREST.  USE AMENDMENTS TO RESOLVE PROBLEMS WITH THE 1986 IMMIGRATION LAWS ALREADY ENACTED. Learn facts not rhetoric or lies at NUMBERSUSA &amp; JUDICIAL WATCH &amp; CAPSWEB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing is a 100 percent perfect and that goes for the government application E-Verify? The answer for any irate hired worker is simple, that if the employer is not satisfied with the results of the immigration verification identity process? You take a copy of your 1-9 form to the Social security agency, to resolve the issue? YOU WILL OBVIOUSLY NOT APPEAR BEFORE AN AGENT OF THE GOVERNMENT, IF YOU HAVE NO AUTHENTIC PAPERS? This is not a complex approach to the problem, although the US Chamber of Commerce, ACLU and a multitude of detrimental businesses have tried to escalate this situation? They say categorically nothing about how to rectify the matter, owing to their main objective is to demonize the process any way they can? Even their adolescent attitude of filing some frivolous lawsuit with the courts fell through?</p>
<p>E-Verification&#8211;MUST&#8211;become a permanent law, not just subject to an employerâ€™s whim?  The public who savor their jobs not being appropriated by foreign workers&#8211;AS HAPPENED IN EUROPE&#8211;should demand E-Verify in every industry, every business with heavy penalties for those who rebuke the law including mandatory jail sentences. EUROPE over several decades has also been  overwhelmed by legal and illegal immigrants, thats why health care across the Atlantic has become compromised?   E-Verify could be easily expanded for many other uses in the US, including admittance to health care, drivers licenses, government subsidies that would include education and home mortgages?</p>
<p>But we must remain vigilant as the status quo has in their influence a group of stalwart politicians. They have secretly conspired to table E-Verify in the past and will no doubt try to eradicate it&#8217;s accessibility in the future. Hundreds of pariah businesses are devoid of a conscious towards the American working man or woman. They have corrupted the lawmakers in Washington, with special interest money and extravagant favors. They have already indoctrinated some of our previously honest leaders with favors and in return we have seen the weakening of 287 G police training apprehension of illegal immigrants. Already President Obama has listened to Sen.Harry Reid D-NV, California&#8217;s own Nancy Pelosi and Napolitano who have weakened other enforcement laws. NO! Innocent children of illegal immigrants who were transplanted by their parents here are not to blame. Our borders have remained like sieves, thanks to  some of the  lawmakers whom we voted for over the years. Legislators are ultimately culpable as they make the decisions, as by inheritance of each administration  who  resides in the White House?</p>
<p>Money was wasted on building the single length border fence instead of Rep.Duncan Hunters planned two-tier barrier as in San Diego?  ICE raids have been reduced and even the No-match-rescinded. More money is wasted overturning enforcement laws, instead of using the full force of these procedures in combating the illegal immigrant invasion.  IF YOU HAVE SOME SOLID KNOWLEDGE OF ILLEGAL WORKERS, CONTACT ICE!  ADDRESS YOUR POLITICIANS AT 202-224-3121 NO MORE COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION REFORM! IT IS NOT IN THE COUNTRIES INTEREST.  USE AMENDMENTS TO RESOLVE PROBLEMS WITH THE 1986 IMMIGRATION LAWS ALREADY ENACTED. Learn facts not rhetoric or lies at NUMBERSUSA &amp; JUDICIAL WATCH &amp; CAPSWEB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swemson</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/09/19/8729/#comment-10770</link>
		<dc:creator>Swemson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=8729#comment-10770</guid>
		<description>You write:

&quot;if the USA were to &quot;LEAD&quot; in the puerile (sp) notion of legalizing drugs&quot;

&quot;PUERILE&quot; notion...?

In your first sentence you show your hatred and lack of objectivity...

&quot;All thats missing from your scenario Mr. Swemson are unicorns crapping rainbows.&quot;

You&#039;re so sure that you&#039;re right, you can&#039;t even listen to a different idea without twisting EVERYTHING I say, and then pronounce YOUR opinions as if they were FACTS.

EXAMPLE:

&quot;â€œWe get rid of the crime, and with it a huge % of the violenceâ€
I have allready show that the opposite is true. Ending Prohibition did NOT stop criminals from continuing their violence. They just moved onto other enterprises &quot;

You haven&#039;t shown ANYTHING.. all you did was disagree with me, and your OPINION, as shown immediately above, is so absurd as to be pathetic.

&quot;Ending Prohibition did NOT stop criminals from continuing their violence.&quot;

It sure as hell stopped the violence associated with illegal booze... And yet you try to imply that I think that legalizing drugs will cause the elimination of ALL crime...

&quot; They just moved onto other enterprises and kept the killing going.&quot;

Yeah right... as if there was never any crime before prohibition....

That&#039;s as stupid as Carter, who, looking at the sign &quot;Bury Obamacare with Kennedy&quot; said that the right wanted to bury Obama himself.

You don&#039;t offer ONE opinion based on facts...

Your solutions have been tried for years, and have NEVER worked, and some of them are so absurd that no reasonable person would ever agree to it...

Harsh penalties ?

&quot;Local dealers, 5 years hard labor first offense. Life after second. Drug trafficking , first offense, life no parole.&quot;

Like America is really going to support the idea of putting a college kid selling dime bags away for 5 years on a first bust or life on a second...  Your idea would require the creation of hundreds of thousands of new prisons beds.....  Only a very small % of drug criminals ever get caught, and we already have 1 adult out of every hundred in America.

So if all you can do is spout stupid and failed ideas, twist the facts to suit your OPINIONS, and insult those who disagree with you, then why don&#039;t you just shut up. You have proven that you have nothing to add to the debate, and that you&#039;re not even worth talking to....

As Groucho said: &quot;Go, and never darken my towels again&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You write:</p>
<p>&#8220;if the USA were to &#8220;LEAD&#8221; in the puerile (sp) notion of legalizing drugs&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;PUERILE&#8221; notion&#8230;?</p>
<p>In your first sentence you show your hatred and lack of objectivity&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;All thats missing from your scenario Mr. Swemson are unicorns crapping rainbows.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re so sure that you&#8217;re right, you can&#8217;t even listen to a different idea without twisting EVERYTHING I say, and then pronounce YOUR opinions as if they were FACTS.</p>
<p>EXAMPLE:</p>
<p>&#8220;â€œWe get rid of the crime, and with it a huge % of the violenceâ€<br />
I have allready show that the opposite is true. Ending Prohibition did NOT stop criminals from continuing their violence. They just moved onto other enterprises &#8221;</p>
<p>You haven&#8217;t shown ANYTHING.. all you did was disagree with me, and your OPINION, as shown immediately above, is so absurd as to be pathetic.</p>
<p>&#8220;Ending Prohibition did NOT stop criminals from continuing their violence.&#8221;</p>
<p>It sure as hell stopped the violence associated with illegal booze&#8230; And yet you try to imply that I think that legalizing drugs will cause the elimination of ALL crime&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8221; They just moved onto other enterprises and kept the killing going.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah right&#8230; as if there was never any crime before prohibition&#8230;.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s as stupid as Carter, who, looking at the sign &#8220;Bury Obamacare with Kennedy&#8221; said that the right wanted to bury Obama himself.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t offer ONE opinion based on facts&#8230;</p>
<p>Your solutions have been tried for years, and have NEVER worked, and some of them are so absurd that no reasonable person would ever agree to it&#8230;</p>
<p>Harsh penalties ?</p>
<p>&#8220;Local dealers, 5 years hard labor first offense. Life after second. Drug trafficking , first offense, life no parole.&#8221;</p>
<p>Like America is really going to support the idea of putting a college kid selling dime bags away for 5 years on a first bust or life on a second&#8230;  Your idea would require the creation of hundreds of thousands of new prisons beds&#8230;..  Only a very small % of drug criminals ever get caught, and we already have 1 adult out of every hundred in America.</p>
<p>So if all you can do is spout stupid and failed ideas, twist the facts to suit your OPINIONS, and insult those who disagree with you, then why don&#8217;t you just shut up. You have proven that you have nothing to add to the debate, and that you&#8217;re not even worth talking to&#8230;.</p>
<p>As Groucho said: &#8220;Go, and never darken my towels again&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

