The ACLU and the Unholy Alliance
The O’Reilly Factor went after the John Adams Project tonight. Kudos to O’Reilly for doing this. The project is to follow CIA officials around and photograph them and show the photographs to Guantanamo terrorists. O’Reilly condemned this exposure of America’s defenders to America’s enemies as disgusting. And he zeroed in on the olympic hypocrisy of liberals who pretended to be concerned over the exposure of Valerie Plame’s covert identity but think nothing of exposing other CIA officials (who don’t share Plame’s leftwing agendas). Yes, but hypocrisy is second nature to radicals because they are on a mission from their god and like the Islamic terrorists they believe that lying to infidels is fair game. What O’Reilly doesn’t concede yet (you could gather this from his discussion with Glenn Beck in the next segment of his show) is that radicals like these ACLUers are willing and self-conscioius accomplices of America’s enemies. In Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left, I explained why they are. I described who the leaders of the the ACLU are and why their campaign to get nearly 400 American city councils to pass resolutions saying they would not cooperate with Homeland Security was an expression of their desire that our enemies would win the war on terror. Oh yes they deplore some of terrorist’s tactics (while explaining why we made them do it). But the goals — the destruction of the free market system (Michael Moore’s got the film coming up) — the defeat of “imperialist” America, that they’re for. In Unholy Alliance I showed how the ACLU works with pro-Communist and pro-Hamas organizations like the Center for Constitutional Rights to defend terrorists and undermine America’s security. What we are witnessing in this conflation of “liberal” with “radical” is a 21st century version of the 1930’s popular front between Communists and liberals.
In Unholy Alliance I described the new radicals as “neo-Communists” because they shared the same view of American society as the old communists and their prescriptions for radical change were drawn from same the moth-eaten and bloody pages of the Marxist left. It’s interesting that people think nothing of referring to neo-conservatives (even though the neo-conservatives think of themselves as old fashioned liberals) but if you call anti-American, marxist radicals “neo-communists” you’re a McCarthyite. I failed to resurrect the term, but now that Van Jones has surfaced as a protege of liberals (Alan Colmes has even described Jones as “a mainstream liberal”) perhaps conservatives and patriotic Americans will start to call neo-communists by a name that actu7ally describes them (as “liberal” does not).
The Democratic Party has major task in front of it which is to dissociate itself from the Communists in its ranks and in its alliances. This happened before in 1948 and the years that followed when socialists like Walter Reuther purged Communists from the CIO and Harry Truman nudged them out of the Democratic Party (they formed the Progressive Party to run against Truman in 1948). Unfortunately, the Communists — now neo-Communists — came back into the Democratic Party in the McGovern campaign of 1972. It’s time to eject them again. Unfortunately this will not be as easy a task since the “progressive caucus” of the Democratic Party in the House numbers over 100 representatives. Because that is not really a feasible task it is doubly important for conservatives to make the distinction between radicals and liberals, between patriots and self-conceived enemies and to hope that the Democratic Party will come back to its senses before it is too late.
I saw that report on The Factor and was shocked (I know I shouldn’t be) that no other media seems to be covering this issue. Thanks for being so quick to highlight it with your blog.
And don’t forget that the ACLU defends NAMBLA’s right to meet and conspire to seduce little boys.
After years of everyone lumped into one pot (with resulting raw feelings that subsequently close minds& hearts), I like the neo-Communist moniker. It’s appropriate, & tight in its implication.
I’ll use it immediately.
Too bad my key board doesn’t have a hammer & sickle to use instead of the ‘C’
Julie
ACLU to work on this
Advocacy of the truth is missing in action the only thing for certin is self interest is being served in the U.S. House of Representatives has Nancy Pelosi let the power go to her head. or has she shown weakness and stuipted Speaker Pelosi has tryed to coverup the art of misrepresentation the character of N.Y. Charlie Rangel ranking Democrat on the Ways and Means committee.1 million dolars taxs cheet.
Misconduct and ethics violations seems to be standard operating procedure Senate Ethics Committee.cleared Democratic Sens. Christopher J. Dodd and Kent Conrad of wrongdoing they just had a lack of judgment.Ethics don’t matter
Mr. Durbin’s great sell-off started the day after this privileged briefing.
Sen. Richard J. Durbin, Illinois Democrat and assistant majority leader, looked like such a great investor. On Sept. 19, he sold off $42,696 in mutual-fund shares, and quickly sold off another $73,000 during the rest of September. The stock market collapsed after that. Within two weeks, by Oct. 3, the Dow Jones Industrial Average had fallen by 9 percent. A month later, by Oct. 17, it had plummeted over 22 percent. On Tuesday this week, the average is still down about 25 percent from Sept. 19.2008
(Chair)John Conyers, Jr. Committee on the Judiciary Conyers is the one not doing his job here letting these other in the Legislature branch off but can Conyers save his wifes ass from going to jail for taking bribes Detroit MI.
Who funds these radical entities? I hope it isn’t the taxpayers.
It is. Both the ACLU and ACORN get funding from the government, which means that you and I are paying for this.
The ACLU and ACORN should lose their funding, as should any other organization, that gets government funding.
My home County has 37,000 people and is home to 393 non-profit organizations whose combined income is $735,065,214 and net worth of $1,815,404,436!!!!
{from http://www.taxexemptworld.com/organizations/addison-county-vt-vermont.asp}
Also, become a member (free) of guidestar.org – from this site you can check IRS form 990 from any non-profit org earning >$25K. See where the money is coming from & who’s getting it.
Julie
It is quite amazing all the funding these groups get and may explain why we are finding it difficult to stop wasteful spending for they would all be signing up for Medicaid. I don’t think they want that to happen.
It would be interesting to discover the percentage of them that do not show up as government employees, but actually are!