Hey Ed, I have been listening to you on and off for years. I particularly enjoyed the off years. But to the point, I did not realize you even had a TV show until I saw the clip about religious “Christian” leaders coming to support healthcare reform. You and your messianic leader can keep your unpublished healthcare plan to yourselves, I’ll die from cancer before I give up myliberty, my children’s or my grandchildren’s liberty for a hollow promise and a pocket full of Obama “change”.

It is said that nurses work for the hospital not for the patient.
The PLAN: This video will show give you an understanding of what has been going on in our world. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3399796904891753774

The government has been working on a giant data base for 10 years that will hold as much information on American citizens as they can gather from all information sources including school and police records.

This Information Technology (IT) data base will contain from the cradle to the grave information on each US citizen.

In 2004, President Bush signed into law “Project Bioshield Act of 2004,” which authorizes the secretaries of the DHS and the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) to take virtual control of the bodies of all American citizens during a national emergency. Health officials are empowered to compel everyone to receive state-mandated medications, vaccinations or devices (implants).
http://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Legislation/FederalFoodDrugandCosmeticActFDCAct/FDCActChaptersIandIIShortTitleandDefinitions/ucm086297.htm

Former Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson (who also ran for US president in 2008) became the largest share holder in Verichip (manufactures implant devices that will track humans and work with the government health data base. Tommy Thompson wanted every US citizen implanted with the device by the end of 2005. That did not happen but it is happening gradually and also in other countries.

If a law for governmental health insurance goes through, what will stop the government from implanting those data storage devices? Whether or not the government tries to force citizens to be injected with drugs, immunizations or devices, they will know what is going on with you and you might not.

HIPPA can prevent people from information while handing it out at any time to entities like organ transplantation industry.

Doctors are now admitting that it is the organ harvesting that kills the patient who had been falsely pronounced dead.

Still now the perverted transplantation industry is looking for more and easier ways to pronounce a living person DEAD so that they can use that living body for harvesting of organs, or living dissection (research/education) –SEE: CONTROVERIES IN THE DETERMINATION OF DEATH “A White Paper by the President’s Council on Bioethics” DECEMBER 2008 http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/death/index.html

SEE: May 13, 2009 Brain death, states of impaired consciousness, and physician-assisted death for end-of-life organ donation and transplantation http://www.springerlink.com/content/xu6n305k7q7475t3/
Which states: “(5) The scientific uncertainty of defining and determining states of impaired consciousness including brain death have been neither disclosed to the general public nor broadly debated by the medical community or by legal and religious scholars. Heart-beating or non-heart-beating organ procurement from patients with impaired consciousness is de facto a concealed practice of physician-assisted death, and therefore, violates both criminal law and the central tenet of medicine not to do harm to patients”. How organs are harvested and the state of the patient during harvesting is also not being told to society.

If you think you have power over yourself by advance directive – might not! The organ transplantation industry steps in and keeps you ventilated so they can harvest your parts (if they want to).
SEE: “The default choice trumps the expressed intent in an individual’s advance health care directive to withhold and/or withdraw life support systems at the end-of-life. The Revised UAGA (2006) overrides advance directives on utilitarian grounds, which is a serious ethical challenge to society”.
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2001294
http://www.chestjournal.org/content/133/1/320.1.full?ck=nck

Placing trust in Representatives and Senators have gotten us to this point, and “We the “People” have been deceived for a very long time by these end-of-life actions.

The TRUTH is not hard to understand so why have elected officials not been protecting “The People” in the past when passing bills into laws? Unfortunately most Representatives and Senators have walked along with “Big Business” instead of doing what is truly best for “The People” and those choices have taken us on the road we now stand.

The most important part of a good health bill would be declaration to protect the life of each and every American citizen by giving good thorough medical care that is only geared to help heal that patient in view of them being a whole and unique human being.

Do you know that in the past two years almost all states of the USA have passed into law what is called the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act 2006 that makes the care of your “parts” (organs) more important than the care of yourself (as a patient).

“Measures necessary for the suitability of the part” can mean anything the organ industry wants it to mean but it’s all about making your “parts” optimal for someone else to use and this is done while the patient is very much alive. Those measures, procedures and treatments can certainly harm the patient. Commonly used on injured, vulnerable patients are large quantities of intravenous fluids, induced hypothermia, paralyzing drugs, induced coma, etc. Unknown to families, donors can be drugged and kept unconscious until death.

The House bill states on page 425: “(A) An explanation by the practitioner of advance care planning, including key questions and considerations, important steps, and suggested people to talk to”. The push here is to get every citizen to have an advanced directive, living will and durable powers of attorney. A “living will” has nothing to do with living but has the ability to be a license to kill (by way of “comfort drugs” that can cause breathing to stop) handed to a doctor (and of course an organ procurement person will be hovering over that patient in hopes to use (it) for harvesting/research/education. A patient’s durable power of attorney may not know their loved one is being drugged into an unconscious state and never given a chance to recover because the plan is to shorten that patient’s life for one reason or another. Statements have been made such as “that ICU bed could be used for someone else”! Organs can be exchanged through Health and Human Services Medicare for big money. A single person parts especially the young can make a million dollars for the industry.

The UAGA 2006 bill was wrote in 2006 and has currently passed in almost all states in the USA.

This is what the UAGA 2006 has changed: The unsound minded person can now become a donor but will have a more difficult time to state a refusal to be a donor (a refusal will require that statement and two signatures and with the unsound minded person their guardian must do it for them).

The UAGA 2006 lacks the requirement for full and explicit informed consent standards. In fact, they want to keep you in the dark because the truth is the harvested people were never dead when their organs are removed.

The UAGA 2006 allows technicians instead of surgeons to harvest body parts.

A donor’s revocation (changing their mind about being a donor) of an anatomical gift of the donor’s body or part is not a refusal and shall not bar another person from making an anatomical gift of the donor’s body or part. Now more people are on a list that can make this donation decision for you including friends!
The UAGA 2006 allows children as young as 15 ½ years of age to consent to organ donation when they go for their drivers permits. Children’s parts may be taken without any extra consent although the law states “if a parent is reasonably available”. But do you think the search for a parent will be as diligent when a child has consented to be a donor as the search for a parent of a child who has refused to be a donor?

In the House bill, the “suggested people to talk to” will be professional end-of-life sales people who would be able to talk most people into anything. But they will not tell you that a person who enters a hospital with a DNR is referred to the organ donation center industry. Most people are unaware that the government passed laws requiring hospitals to contact the organ industry and now years later it has advanced to where organ harvesting personnel are actually stationed in hospitals waiting for the injured to arrive through ER.

Chuck Norris recently wrote this: ["Dirty secret No. 1 in Obamacare is about the government's coming into homes and usurping parental rights over child care and development.

The bill says that the government agents, "well-trained and competent staff," would "provide parents with knowledge of age-appropriate child development in cognitive, language, social, emotional, and motor domains ... modeling, consulting, and coaching on parenting practices," and "skills to interact with their child to enhance age-appropriate development.""]

Any one with knowledge in eugenics (ridding the world of undesirables) can understand where this part of the bill where these government agents can take our country. Don’t think it can’t happen, because it already is in the Netherlands. Young living babies are being screened and determined whether or not to be put to death.
Page 840 sums it up when it states: “(D) home visitation programs supported using such funds will, when appropriate, provide referrals to other programs serving children and families; and
“(E) the State will comply with subsection (i), and cooperate with any evaluation conducted under subsection (j).

Video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3399796904891753774

And maybe most workers will not even know what is truly going on because the determinations will be made by the Health and Human “Secretary” by means of the giant data base. Ex-Governor of Alaska, Sara Palin has described the selectors as the “death panel”.

I can tell you haven’t listened to his radio show or watched his tv program that long. He’s criticized Obama and his failure to lead on healthcare, allowing unions to organize, etc. a lot on radio.

Granted, Schultz is a lot nicer to Obama than people on the widely recognized Left (Chomsky, Zinn, Nader, etc.) are, but he has to maintain a mass audience or his show won’t suceed. I used to listen to quite a bit of progressive radio in Seattle, and for the record, I think Schultz is among the fairest, most level-headed progressive commentators out there.

Mike Malloy is entertaining, but over-the-top. Thom Hartman: informative, but sometimes his pace is plodding and he can bore you after a while. Randi Rhodes comes off like a leftwing Town Hall screamer sometimes.

Schultz can take on the rightwingers anyday, but he’s not afraid to deliver an asskicking on the Democrats when they fail to represent their consituents either.

Here is just one small but powerful example that shows the absurdity of the claims that Christian leaders’ silence about DeathCare are unchristian and contrary to Christ’s teachings.

(Jesus’ own words)
Matthew 6:1-4. “Be careful not to do your ‘acts of righteousness’ before men, to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from you Father in Heaven.
So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.”