A degree is not a golden ticket to escape lousy jobs!

2009 August 12
by David Swindle

goldenticket

It looks like Andrew Sullivan is taking a break from daily blogging. His assistants and other assorted bloggers are taking his place in manning the Daily Dish.

Chris Bodenner highlighted the thoughts of two readers on “The Value of Shi**y Work.” The sentiment of this is one that I find really, really annoying:

To the people who say that the unemployed should accept menial jobs, I would say… why should I? Speaking from personal experience, I put in 4 years getting an undergraduate degree and 2 years getting a professional certification so that I wouldn’t have to work in a warehouse. From an economic standpoint, does it make sense to force talented workers into dead-end jobs just to survive? Or to give them a safety net, and let them find a job more suited to their skills?

Why should you? Why should you?

Bodenner’s reader’s comment infuriates me far more than anything that Keith Olbermann, Bill Maher, or Rachel Maddow have said in the past few weeks.

Why should you get a job to support yourself? Why should you take responsibility to support yourself and earn a living? Why is it that just because you have a bachelor’s degree perhaps you are not entitled to your dream job as soon as you graduate?

This whole mentality reminds me of the health care debate. A few weeks ago I saw an interview on CNN in which an unemployed woman said that President Barack Obama’s plan of a “public option” was not good enough for her. If she was unemployed how could she afford to pay the monthly premiums for the government plan? That was actually her argument. And she made it with a straight face.

Again, a tremendously frustrating sentiment to hear.

The reason why the unemployed CNN guest and Bodenner’s Dish reader infuriate me at such a base level is they’re basically making a personal attack on the life I’ve chosen to live since graduating from college in 2006. It’s usually difficult to land one’s dream job fresh out school — no matter what career you’re pursuing. So what’d I do? I took responsibility for supporting myself. I took “shi**y jobs,” made sure that I got health insurance through them, and pursued the job that was “more suited to my skills” (to use the Dish reader’s terms) on a part-time basis until I finally got it.

Is it really that “heartless” of me to advocate this kind of philosophy? I know what my “progressive” friends are going to say. They’re going to lambast the “pull yourself up by your own bootstraps” philosophy. They’re going to say that no one makes it on their own. They’re going to try and paint me as some social Darwinist who just wants the poor to die because the government won’t give them cheap or free medical care.

gene-wilder-willy-wonka

But is this really that unreasonable? My point is this: if you want health insurance, go get a job that provides health insurance. Take some responsibility for getting your own health insurance. Don’t rely on Barack Wonka the Candyman to give it to you covered in colorful wrapping on a stick. There are plenty of jobs out there, and at my two “shi**y” jobs they seemed to always be hiring new people every month.

And on the question of fresh college graduates not wanting to settle for these mediocre jobs so they can get health insurance and a livable wage, the point made by Bodenner’s second, more thoughtful reader has a lot of value:

These experiences have led to my “shi**y job” theory: everyone should have to work a shi**y job at least once in their lives. It does two important things for you:

1) It inspires you to achieve something greater. We called the full-time year-round workers at McDonald’s “McLifers”. It was a future I would have done anything to avoid — I viewed it as the prison sentence it sounds like — and I worked hard to make sure when I left I wouldn’t have to come back.

2) It gives you some empathy for people who have to make a living at a shi**y job.

Education is not completed when you stop going to school. In the three years I spent working “shi**y jobs” I learned just as much about our world, our economy, American Freedom, and the people of this country as I did in school. This might not be the sweetest food for thought but sometimes we need to eat our intellectual vegetables.

  • Share/Bookmark

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

4 Responses leave one →
  1. August 12, 2009

    Most of us have had shi**y jobs, and have made choices based on the availability or cost of health insurance. After all, employer supplied health insurance costs about sixteen thousand dollars per year. That is $16,000 per year that we could be paid instead of having an employer pay the carrier. But that is way too honest for today’s health care debate, and A. Sullivan is about as far as one could go away from honesty. If we were to be honest, we could frame the debate by stating two very uncomfortable truths. Undeniable, and absolutely true:

    The single biggest problem with health care insurance is that the customer (patient) is completely removed from the consequences of cost. Patients MUST be made to pay part of every dollar spent on their behal;f, or nothing will get better in the area of cost of health care insurance.

    The single biggest problem with health care provision is lack of transparency in charges. When medicare pays the least expensive rate and therefore hospitals and doctors charge the indigent, who pay cash, at the highest possible rate you have the most unfair possible system. Insurors pay a rate somewhere in the middle.

    When congress and the president promise to pay for more of the currently uninsured with cuts in medicare they are promising to make the system MORE unfair, not less, but all is fair in the quest for power, and make no mistake, this is all about the transfer of power from us to the politicians.

  2. davidforsmark permalink
    August 12, 2009

    Andrew went nuts during the Bush Administration, mostly in a hissy fit over gay marriage. His descent was complete with his pushing of the Sarah Palin’s baby really belongs to her daughter conspiracy that he pushed long after even most of the loonies had abandoned it.

  3. David Swindle
    August 12, 2009

    I know Sullivan isn’t the most popular figure as far as most conservatives are concerned. And the Right certainly has some legitimate grievances. That being said, Sullivan’s book The Conservative Soul is really worth reading. It was one of the key books that led to me abandoning my leftist faith. It really set me up for Horowitz’s The Politics of Bad Faith quite nicely.

    Some good points on health care, btw.

  4. David Swindle
    August 14, 2009

    Yeah, you’re right, but still check out The Conservative Soul. It’s a great book and you’re missing out if you avoid it because of his recent lapses.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS