“Conservative” Kathleen Parker Outdoes Leftie Joan Walsh in Palin Derangement Syndrome
Here’s an etiquette tip for Kathleen Parker, self-appointed arbiter of what’s acceptable for conservatives to do–and be–while mixing with polite society: When a radical moonbat like Salon.com;s Joan Walsh effuses that your column is “awesome,” you should pause to reconsider your arguments, not flutter your eyelids and say “Thank you.”
Palin Derangement Syndrome (“PDS”) reached a new high (or low) on Chris Matthews’s MSNBC show Hardball Wednesday night,, when Parker essentially called Palin an illiterate tool for racists, to the delight of Matthews and Walsh.
Parker, a Washington Post columnist who instantly became one of the mainstream media’s favorite “conservatives” when she was one of the first to blast the Palin pick by John McCain, outdid herself in a recent column. While “A Tip for The GOP: Look Away” was ostensibly about Ohio Senator George Voinovich’s recent comments that the Republican Party is being ruined by “Southerners,” Parker couldn’t resist mixing in a little northern exposure.
Even lines like “Southern Republicans, it seems, have seceded from sanity,” are not enough, you see, to guarantee an invite to the cocktail circuit and garner media appearances. No, for that you need to throw into a tired rehash of the GOP’s supposed racist “southern strategy,” slurs like this:
That same rage was on display again in the fall of 2008, but this time the frenzy was stimulated by a pretty gal with a mocking little wink. Sarah Palin may not have realized what she was doing, but Southerners weaned on Harper Lee [author of To Kill a Mockingbird] heard the dog whistle.
Fellow PDS sufferer Chris Matthews could hardly contain his glee. “I’ve never seen a stronger column in the newspapers,” he gushed. And opened his segment with the question: “Kathleen, ‘heard the dog whistle.’ Is Sarah Palin a poster girl for racism? Yes or no?”
Parker’s weak response? “Not consciously.” But lest you think she was conceding a moral point to Palin, read on. Parker was merely suggesting that illiterate Sarah Palin had never heard of one of America’s best loved and most celebrated novels, Harper Lee’s classic book.
Read the self-satirical exchange for yourself.
MATTHEWS: Not consciously?
PARKER: Not consciously. I don`t think — I certainly don’t think she, Sarah Palin, knows anything about Harper Lee or this deep history in the South, where you don’t position a white woman and a black male and pretend like there’s nothing happening there. There’s a deep, deep history. That’s why I mentioned, dropped the Harper Lee in there. You want to talk about the Southern Strategy…
MATTHEWS: Well, it’s like To Kill a Mockingbird. I just saw it again, one of the great movies ever, where the white woman claimed that she’d been, you know, molested, whatever, by this totally innocent black guy.
PARKER: Right.
MATTHEWS: And she was believed for no reason, except she said so.
PARKER: Right. Look — and please let me be really, really clear. I’m not saying Sarah Palin did that. I’m just saying that there’s this subliminal level, subliminal level of communication that goes on. The Southern Strategy has always been — well, since they stopped using the N-word and being explicit about what they’re trying to do with race and, you know, creating this “us versus them” dynamic, it became increasingly vague through the years. You started talking about states rights at a certain point. Then you started talking about, you know, these wedge issues like gay marriage and on and on. But ultimately, it’s always about an “us and them” dynamic.
JOAN WALSH: Right.
PARKER: And Sarah Palin’s really very good at that. And she is, you know, when she plays her populist role, there’s no one better at it.
MATTHEWS: Is she connecting the dots, Joan, among Henry Louis Gates [the black Harvard professor who irresponsibly accused a white Cambridge sergeant of racism] , the birther movement, the [Supreme Court Justice nominee] Sotomayor testimony and confirmation questioning, so tribalistic? There’s no doubt about it. All that stuff has become very tribalistic, something we thought we’d begun to crack in this country. Uh, is Sarah the dog whistle that says, “yeah, that’s what it’s about”?
WALSH: I think Sarah Palin’s overall message is one of “us versus them.” I think that she took the lead on the campaign trail — and you and I talked about it back in September and October, Chris — in really making Obama “the other.” She would literally say things like, you know, we don’t know enough about him. We’re not sure where he’s from. She would talk about the regular America, you know, and palling around with terrorists. We’ve taken that apart. So she was the person, not John McCain — maybe behind the scenes the McCain people were encouraging her, but she had a real zest for it, you know. She did it with a real zing and panache. She really, you know, she had that visceral appearance of enjoying it when she was really saying some pretty hateful and not founded things. Barack Obama is one of us. He’s very much so. The only thing different about him is–he’s black. He’s our first black President. And, you know, I think we’ve made enormous racial progress. I don’t want to, and I know Kathleen doesn’t want to overstate what’s going on right now. But we’re in a moment right now with the birthers, with the reaction to the Gates affair, with the trashing of Sonia Sotomayor, and, you know, even John McCain saying he’s not going to vote for her, where the Republican party seems, seems to believe that its best route is tribalism and scaring people. Whether they’re scaring people about Obama is going to take away your health care or they’re scaring you about we don’t know what he’s about; he’s a Muslim, he’s a socialist, it’s fear. The tactic is fear and fear alone. And I loved Kathleen’s column. It was awesome.
PARKER: Thank you.
To sum up Parker’s Political Etiquette:
- 1. If a black man is on one ticket, a white woman cannot be on the other.
- 2. If the above ever happens, the woman cannot campaign in the South.
- 3. Said woman can never, ever, seem to enjoy connecting with the crowd.
- 4. Democrats can say that people who come to town halls are Nazis, health insurers are profiting off your misery, Homeland Security under Republicans are reading your emails, and Big Oil is stealing your kids’ lunch money; but if a Republican says government is taking too much of your paycheck, socialized medicine is a bad idea, marriage is for a man and a woman, law-abiding citizens have a right to defend themselves, environmentalists should not keep us from cheap, efficient energy supplies, and unborn babies have a right to live, that’s divisive “us vs. them” politics and probably racist to boot.
But wait, there’s more!
After Matthews invoked a suspect poll commissioned by the leftwing hatefest website, The Daily Kos, asserting that a majority of Southerners will not affirm President Obama’s birth status, the conversation became, if anything, even more surreal.
Matthews begged the question, “So why is the South alone in this regard? Not Northeast, not Midwest, not West. But the South stands out there uniquely and regionally and racially opposed to this guy?”
While Walsh didn’t bite, saying “I’m not sure,” Parker had the answer:
PARKER: One word, Chris, one word: Confederacy. I mean, you know, the South is very, I live there, okay? I want to make that clear, too, because I`m not bashing southerners. I love the South and I am a southerner. But-
MATTHEWS: But 40 percent of those states like yours are black.
PARKER: It’s part of the history.
MATTHEWS: So it’s the 60 percent that are white!
PARKER: It’s part of the culture to be secessionist.
MATTHEWS: Like Rick Perry effectively is?
PARKER: To always view the federal government as the enemy. And it`s very, yeah, yes, I can’t, I can’t-
MATTHEWS: How about Palin? Let’s talk about Palin. Palin has attacked New York, Washington and Los Angeles. She goes after the government, after the media, after Hollywood. Anything that’s on the coast is evil to her. She’s an Alaskan who, I bet you any money, is going to spend most of her time down in the middle parts of the country, the rural white parts. She’s going to find those cul de sacs of whitedom, and exploit the hell out of them, right?
Saturday Night Live’s Darryl Hammond couldn’t outdo this in a satical Hardball sketch. At least if the Washington Post goes bankrupt like so many other liberal newspapers, Kathleen Parker can find a home for her PDS at Salon.com. Hopefully their health insurance covers psychological pre-existing conditions.
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Trackbacks and Pingbacks
- Everything Now about Race for Chris Matthews « NewsReal Blog
- Sullivan’s Travels: Andrew’s Alternate Universe. « NewsReal Blog
- NewsReal Sunday: Liberals are Culturally Programmed to Honor the Dead, but Ignore Their Valor « NewsReal Blog
- Chris Matthews’s All-White Panel Notes Melanin Deficiency in Palin Audience « NewsReal Blog
- Protesting While White: Chris Matthews’s New PC Crime | NewsReal Blog





















WALSH: “I think Sarah Palin’s overall message is one of “us versus them.â€
Heck “us verses them” is the entire subtext of Obama, his campaign and politics. But they won’t see it.
The concerted effort to demonize and destroy Sarah Palin is a result of their fear of an attractive candidate who can garner a populist groundswell to a view of life that progressive socialists fear most. The marxist-socialist movement did not die with the Soviet Union. It has always found refuge among a hard core group of elitists in academia, labor, law, government, media and journalism. The infiltration into even “conservative” outlets can be a warning to all of the incredible tenacity of the collective virus. Palin may be no Renaissance scholar, but her core values and success really underline the American experience. Never in my life have I witnessed such a attempt to destroy, no, obliterate, a person who poses such a threat to the progressive socialist’s agenda. There is not a racist bone in her body. The Democratic Party, a party I have disowned, has been usurped by the radicals who encourage the divisiveness inherent in their ideology. They are not unifiers. They are sowers of discord with their Luciferian thought police. Their division of people into class, race and gender and the agitation propaganda and activism that fuels it, are right out of the KGB/Novosti playbook. Subversion of American principles is their undeclared goal by weakening our primary institutions. Sarah Palin, like her or leave her, is one one of the Amazons in this world war.
She presented so much in that article and opened up a real can of whoopee-cushion there. So condescending as is “typical” of liberals. I usually know a liberal when h/her attempt at sincere discussion is to insult you first.(sometimes without realizing it) But you are always supposed to take their effort as genuine and benign. The other factor about Parker is assumes she is the spokesperson for the GOP. Another common tic of liberals to claim to speak for their opposition — and take them sincerely, chuckle. Now Kathleen is claiming to speak for Southerners here. She’s an ordained authority, supposedly. However, Parker is more of the Washington player, and much of her thinking embodies the mindset.
Yet she’s an authority on GOP and Southerners, but also Washington elites, which she doesn’t mention. She is an authority on everything. She’s a real southern belle … with a bold-faced crack in it. A crack in a bell affects every ring or thud. How about writing something she knows even better, an elite Washington curmudgeon, and maybe we all could benefit from finding out about their characteristics.
Fascinating exchange. The liberals are totally insane, aren’t they? I mean, they’ve finally really gone ’round the bend. The conversation sounds like a weird kind of liberal “pillow talk,” stroking each other and propping up each other’s delusions.
The real question is: Are liberals actually native to planet Earth?
I conceded last year, after Obama looked like he was going to win the democratic nomination, that Parker was already in his camp. She was enthralled by him. You could tell by the change of rhetoric in her columns. I have only remained more disappointed with time, so now I never read her articles.
This is just another “Let’s insult Southerners as being ignorant” tirade from so-called elite progressives. Didn’t Matthews work for one of those biased, ignorant hoo-haws who inhabited the WH at one time?
Are all of us ignorant or is it just conservative Southerners? It seems as if one segment of the population can’t go an hour without telling us how out of touch we are. As far as Parker being a Southern belle, I would have called her a lot of things but not that. She insults the South every time she opens her mouth or hits a keyboard. As for Matthews, no one is more adept as spewing insults as he. And far as Palin is concerned, I don’t care how she looks, attractive or not, she touched a nerve in the conservative community with her common sense and attempt to relate how and where this country is headed. Matthews is such as ass and really can’t help hating Palin because she is prettier than he is and he drops a hint on her looks or demeanor every time he talks about her. I wonder about males who are threatned by a woman’s looks and brains and I have concluded in his case that he has to tear someone, anyone, down to elevate himself.
And I might add, I do view the federal government as enemy and have done so for a long time now. I say kick them all out and start over and make sure that term limits are in place before replacing them.
By the way, I loved the phrase “cul de sacs of whitedome”. I won’t hold my breath to hear a progressive use the phrase “cul de sacs of blackdom”. Blackdom=racist, whitedom=accepted verbiage.
If you take “you know” out of Parker’s conversation, it would take up 1/2 the space, but then there would be no content.
Oh, so NOW, Sarah Palin is a Southerner?! This is simply “that woman thing”, where one woman is jealous of, and puts down another. Losers hate winners. This begins in grade school, and for a good percentage of women, it is a lifelong ego syndrome.
As a resident of the SF Bay Area, I always thought derangement against the South was a liberal mental disease. That’s all I hear from my Leftie friends: “If it weren’t for all the states east of New Mexico and south of the Mason-Dixon line, the U.S. would be a good country,” “Those fat, inbred, morons are holding back the nation,” etc. I see now that Southerner Derangement Syndrome (SDS…. errr, a new twist on a old acronym) is just the world view of elitist snobs–on the Left and the Right.