Comments on: So Many Czars, So Little Time: Michelle Malkin Explains Who Obama's "Special Assistants" Are

By: Top DoD Appointments Unfilled (However, Unaccountable Czars Abound) | Democrat = Socialist

Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:40:52 +0000

[...] Newsreal [...]

By: Joseph White

Joseph White — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 22:44:02 +0000

Once again, people need to read their history. CZar, is a russian shortening of the word Ceaser. As in the roman emperor.

In this land of freedom, we don’t need Czar’s, who the senate can’t control, the house can’t get information out of, and who are beyond the law. In my opinion, Czar’s are no better than Communist party officials, or KGB agents.

What someone needs to do is put these Czar’s under congressional oversight, and make them answerable to somebody. Or better yet, fire them and make them get real jobs.

By: Roy

Roy — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:55:48 +0000

I think we need Czar to keep an eye on the other Czars.

By: Len Powder

Len Powder — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 03:50:43 +0000

To understand Obama and his cronies we need to understand this one thing: they do not have any use for the Constitution, for American traditions or history, for churches, Bibles, or – in their view – “cherished” but anachronistic ideals and morals.

They have taken the American government hostage and will probably not surrender it except at the point of a gun. They are like the tyrants we have detested and defeated many times over in our history, whether at home or abroad. We need to see them for what they really are and stop listening to their propaganda and lies. We need to rise up and throw them overboard, like tea bags, before 2012 – if not sooner.

By: Shirley McMahan

Shirley McMahan — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 22:47:05 +0000

Thanks to Michelle Malkin’s explanation of the Czars. Is there anywhere in our Constitution that says the President can appoint Czars to be special assistants? And why is no one protesting, or is it just that the media has blocked the protests. I’m disgusted at even the idea of Czars in America, or are we still the United States of America?

By: Carole Frazier

Carole Frazier — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:44:20 +0000

Never mind the Czars, who says Obama has the right to be President. He refuses to show his Long Form Birth Certificate, why? Hes had his attornies in the cost of 800,000 plus to stop anyone from viewing it. The document lists Obama’s parents as Barack Hussein Obama and Stanley Ann Obama, formerly Stanley Ann Dunham, the birth date as Aug. 4, 1961, and the hospital of birth as Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya.
So I ask you, is this President really our President or is there someone in office that has fooled us all trying to destroy America?
If there is nothing to hide then he would show his Long Form Birth Certificate and allow it to be Verified. Why not clear this all up if he has nothing to hide.

Go to: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105764 and read all abut it.

By: Len Powder

Len Powder — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:07:18 +0000

The Czars exist for two reasons: (1) To server their Emperor Obama, and (2) to enrich themselves. They have no use for constitutional limits or restraints and for congressional oversight. They represent a concentration of power in the Executive Branch which is unprecedented and dangerous. But then, the entire Obama Administration presents more danger and risk to this nation than Radical Islam. Obama & Associates have accomplished a coup de’tat while we were busy watching ‘American Idol’.

By: austin personal trainers

austin personal trainers — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 23:35:07 +0000

We need a cheeseburger czar. There is too much fat in those burgers and I need the government to protect me.