SUBSCRIBE:
Claude Cartaginese

Free Speech TV: The Government Thinks You're Too Fat (and What They're Going to do About it)

by
Posted on July 29 2009 12:12 am

A segment last night on Democracy Now!, the voice of American Marxism, made casual reference to a report issued recently by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). According to that report, the cost of treating obesity-related ailments soared to a high of $147 billion last year, which is a staggering 9% of all health-care costs. In the last eight years, the proportion of obese Americans is up 37%, and the cost of treating the obese is twice as high as for people of normal weight.

Sounds like there’s a “Fat Czar” on the horizon.

We know that President Barack Obama, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, and other believers in big-government central planning have identified the “reform” of the health care system as their number one priority (this month, at any rate). Universal health care, if passed, is going to be prohibitively expensive, and in order to cut costs, those of you who frequent the buffet table will soon find yourselves squarely in the government’s crosshairs.

Since the average American is, according to the CDC, now about 23 pounds overweight, the CDC report includes a list of “proposals” designed to counteract this obesity epidemic. If you like the idea of having the government micromanage every aspect of your life, then you will love these guidelines from the CDC. Here’s a sampling from the report:

  1. Communities should restrict availability of less healthy foods and beverages in public service venues.
  2. Communities should institute smaller portion size options in public service venues.
  3. Communities should limit advertisements of less healthy foods and beverages.
  4. Communities should discourage consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages.
  5. Communities should reduce screen time in public service venues. (Licensed child care facilities [will be] required to limit screen viewing time to no more than 2 hours per day for children aged ≥2 years.)

 

One has to wonder if the formation of a nanny state is the kind of “change” that people had in mind when they went to the polls last November. While no one will deny that maintaining a sensible bodyweight is advantageous, do you really want the government peering over you shoulder scrutinizing the size and the contents of your dinner plate — and imposing punitive taxes on foods that are unapproved ?

3 Responses leave one →

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

Copyright 2014 NewsReal Blog

The Theme Foundry