<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HBO: Just because you have an excuse to be racist doesn&#039;t mean we&#039;ll tolerate your racism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/18/hbo-just-because-you-have-an-excuse-to-be-racist-doesnt-mean-well-tolerate-your-racism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/18/hbo-just-because-you-have-an-excuse-to-be-racist-doesnt-mean-well-tolerate-your-racism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 04:49:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Maher, now with more racism: GOP is &#8216;party of apes,&#8217; singles out Allen West &#124; Twitchy</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/18/hbo-just-because-you-have-an-excuse-to-be-racist-doesnt-mean-well-tolerate-your-racism/#comment-582815</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Maher, now with more racism: GOP is &#8216;party of apes,&#8217; singles out Allen West &#124; Twitchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=2680#comment-582815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] When Bill Maher called President Obama not a &#8220;real black president,&#8221; he also said that if you are &#8220;a racist in America today, you are probably a Republican.&#8220; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When Bill Maher called President Obama not a &#8220;real black president,&#8221; he also said that if you are &#8220;a racist in America today, you are probably a Republican.&#8220; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Sears</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/18/hbo-just-because-you-have-an-excuse-to-be-racist-doesnt-mean-well-tolerate-your-racism/#comment-95316</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Sears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 09:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=2680#comment-95316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Continuing the thought.... 
 
I am very conservative politically and do vote Republican, though I&#8217;m not registered as such. I will go so far as to recognize (how can we not?) that many Americans who are prejudiced against blacks and Hispanics would hardly be likely to vote Democrat but rather Republican. That said, Maher&#8217;s comment is STILL pure unadulterated idiocy. Why? 
 
Because R-A-C-I-S-M is the worldview that divides that humanity into the &#8220;good&#8221; and the &#8220;bad&#8221; on the basis of a skin color. For Maher to think (if he really does) that all such people maintaining that kind of worldview are to be found in or associated with the Republican party is, at best, moronically naive and, at worst, intentionally&#8230; and slimily&#8230; insidious. Neither of which puts Maher in a very shining light. I suspect that&#8217;s the last time they&#8217;ll ever have THAT comedian (joker, clown&#8230;) on &#8220;This Week&#8221;. 
 
I am quite sure you&#8217;ll find that the dramatic preponderance of those Americans with an inner, ingrained, constitutional antagonism towards white people&#8230; are voting Democrat. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continuing the thought&#8230;. </p>
<p>I am very conservative politically and do vote Republican, though I&rsquo;m not registered as such. I will go so far as to recognize (how can we not?) that many Americans who are prejudiced against blacks and Hispanics would hardly be likely to vote Democrat but rather Republican. That said, Maher&rsquo;s comment is STILL pure unadulterated idiocy. Why? </p>
<p>Because R-A-C-I-S-M is the worldview that divides that humanity into the &ldquo;good&rdquo; and the &ldquo;bad&rdquo; on the basis of a skin color. For Maher to think (if he really does) that all such people maintaining that kind of worldview are to be found in or associated with the Republican party is, at best, moronically naive and, at worst, intentionally&hellip; and slimily&hellip; insidious. Neither of which puts Maher in a very shining light. I suspect that&rsquo;s the last time they&rsquo;ll ever have THAT comedian (joker, clown&hellip;) on &ldquo;This Week&rdquo;. </p>
<p>I am quite sure you&rsquo;ll find that the dramatic preponderance of those Americans with an inner, ingrained, constitutional antagonism towards white people&hellip; are voting Democrat. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Sears</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/18/hbo-just-because-you-have-an-excuse-to-be-racist-doesnt-mean-well-tolerate-your-racism/#comment-95274</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Sears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 15:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=2680#comment-95274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you hate white people, you&#039;re certainly a Democrat. 
Not that all Democrats hate white people (don&#039;t twist my words!) 
But the people who hate white people are all Democrats. 
Just sayin&#039;.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you hate white people, you&#039;re certainly a Democrat.<br />
Not that all Democrats hate white people (don&#039;t twist my words!)<br />
But the people who hate white people are all Democrats.<br />
Just sayin&#039;.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HBO: Bill, one can&#8217;t pick minorities&#8217; &#8220;side&#8221; when one denies the Left&#8217;s lie of a racial war &#171; NewsReal Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/18/hbo-just-because-you-have-an-excuse-to-be-racist-doesnt-mean-well-tolerate-your-racism/#comment-3581</link>
		<dc:creator>HBO: Bill, one can&#8217;t pick minorities&#8217; &#8220;side&#8221; when one denies the Left&#8217;s lie of a racial war &#171; NewsReal Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=2680#comment-3581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] If you ask me, to quote John Dean, there is a cancer on the Republican Party and it is racism. I told this to Joe Scarborough last week&#8230; For a party that is trying to attract minorities or claims to be&#8230; One time side with the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you ask me, to quote John Dean, there is a cancer on the Republican Party and it is racism. I told this to Joe Scarborough last week&#8230; For a party that is trying to attract minorities or claims to be&#8230; One time side with the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/18/hbo-just-because-you-have-an-excuse-to-be-racist-doesnt-mean-well-tolerate-your-racism/#comment-3580</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=2680#comment-3580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well Dan

Quite a nice summary of the Political Correct position.  Lets have a little look.

First point, slavery is close to a universal custom, all races and cultures have practiced it at one time or another.  Historically whites have been slaves as often as slave owners.  Suggest you stop using historical arguments if they require a re-write of history.

Second point.  Your racism.  According to you the only thing one needs to know is the color of the persons skin.  White = all racist.  Not true incidentally, the vast majority of whites never owned slaves. strictly an elite practice.  But that is irrelevant to you.  You be white, you be guilty - a blatantly racist position.  Blacks of course, following the PC agenda, are all noble and oppressed.  Black slave owners, and African slavery simply disappear down the memory hole.  Many blacks in the US are not the decedents of slaves, no matter.  Skin color is all you need to determine moral superiority.  So again a purely racist position.  All you need to know is what color a person is and you can determine their your moral worth and rights.

Blacks are stopped more often.  A restatement of the whites bad, blacks good mantra.  I suppose the much higher black crime rates are not a factor in who gets stopped?  Going to give me the spin that whites are responsible for that too.

Hateful comments about Obama, oh my the humanity.  Curiously, the same people who where ballistic about Bush and were loud in abuse are now  Victorian spinsters when their guy is criticized.  Another double standard.  One standard for what can be said about whites and who can say it and another about blacks.  So freedom of speech goes through the racism filter too.

As to your higher moral ground of race guilt.  Are you aware that race guilt is the primary justification of anti-sematism?  Some higher ground.

To sum it up your entire PC position is ahistorical and racist, abet PC correct reverse racism.  Still racism though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Dan</p>
<p>Quite a nice summary of the Political Correct position.  Lets have a little look.</p>
<p>First point, slavery is close to a universal custom, all races and cultures have practiced it at one time or another.  Historically whites have been slaves as often as slave owners.  Suggest you stop using historical arguments if they require a re-write of history.</p>
<p>Second point.  Your racism.  According to you the only thing one needs to know is the color of the persons skin.  White = all racist.  Not true incidentally, the vast majority of whites never owned slaves. strictly an elite practice.  But that is irrelevant to you.  You be white, you be guilty &#8211; a blatantly racist position.  Blacks of course, following the PC agenda, are all noble and oppressed.  Black slave owners, and African slavery simply disappear down the memory hole.  Many blacks in the US are not the decedents of slaves, no matter.  Skin color is all you need to determine moral superiority.  So again a purely racist position.  All you need to know is what color a person is and you can determine their your moral worth and rights.</p>
<p>Blacks are stopped more often.  A restatement of the whites bad, blacks good mantra.  I suppose the much higher black crime rates are not a factor in who gets stopped?  Going to give me the spin that whites are responsible for that too.</p>
<p>Hateful comments about Obama, oh my the humanity.  Curiously, the same people who where ballistic about Bush and were loud in abuse are now  Victorian spinsters when their guy is criticized.  Another double standard.  One standard for what can be said about whites and who can say it and another about blacks.  So freedom of speech goes through the racism filter too.</p>
<p>As to your higher moral ground of race guilt.  Are you aware that race guilt is the primary justification of anti-sematism?  Some higher ground.</p>
<p>To sum it up your entire PC position is ahistorical and racist, abet PC correct reverse racism.  Still racism though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/18/hbo-just-because-you-have-an-excuse-to-be-racist-doesnt-mean-well-tolerate-your-racism/#comment-3579</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=2680#comment-3579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruce, come on man!  White folk (our ancestors) bought slaves.  We then brought them over here, treated them like dirt, and then continued to mistreat them with segregation and general prejudice.  This went on for centuries!  And to top it all off you can read study after study showing that blacks are far more likely to be pulled over than whites, and case after case of systemic racism to this day!  We owe them because our ancestors created this whole mess in the first place.  And amidst all the hateful, racist comments that have come up around the Obama presidency it&#039;s clear we have a long, long way to go.

Jill, there were racists in both parties.  Jesse Helms, Strom Thurmond, and many other Republicans were/are bigoted, hateful people.  Neither party is without sin, and both would do well to remember that.

Now, as far as the examples given, I agree 100% - I don&#039;t care what color someone&#039;s skin is, racism is wrong.  And you know, there are a lot of people on the left who agree with me.  In fact I&#039;ve never heard this &#039;canned argument&#039; before - that it&#039;s OK for some people to be racist.  So if this is a popular leftist slogan then there must be some conspiracy where they make sure only to say it when I&#039;m not around... I think what&#039;s more likely is that people aren&#039;t aware of some of the racism that happens on &#039;their side,&#039; and that - mixed with a little unwillingness to admit that &#039;their side&#039; makes mistakes - is why people tend to be reluctant to acknowledge the problem of racism within their political party/affiliation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce, come on man!  White folk (our ancestors) bought slaves.  We then brought them over here, treated them like dirt, and then continued to mistreat them with segregation and general prejudice.  This went on for centuries!  And to top it all off you can read study after study showing that blacks are far more likely to be pulled over than whites, and case after case of systemic racism to this day!  We owe them because our ancestors created this whole mess in the first place.  And amidst all the hateful, racist comments that have come up around the Obama presidency it&#8217;s clear we have a long, long way to go.</p>
<p>Jill, there were racists in both parties.  Jesse Helms, Strom Thurmond, and many other Republicans were/are bigoted, hateful people.  Neither party is without sin, and both would do well to remember that.</p>
<p>Now, as far as the examples given, I agree 100% &#8211; I don&#8217;t care what color someone&#8217;s skin is, racism is wrong.  And you know, there are a lot of people on the left who agree with me.  In fact I&#8217;ve never heard this &#8216;canned argument&#8217; before &#8211; that it&#8217;s OK for some people to be racist.  So if this is a popular leftist slogan then there must be some conspiracy where they make sure only to say it when I&#8217;m not around&#8230; I think what&#8217;s more likely is that people aren&#8217;t aware of some of the racism that happens on &#8216;their side,&#8217; and that &#8211; mixed with a little unwillingness to admit that &#8216;their side&#8217; makes mistakes &#8211; is why people tend to be reluctant to acknowledge the problem of racism within their political party/affiliation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HBO: Bill Maher&#8217;s redemptive moments &#171; NewsReal Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/18/hbo-just-because-you-have-an-excuse-to-be-racist-doesnt-mean-well-tolerate-your-racism/#comment-3578</link>
		<dc:creator>HBO: Bill Maher&#8217;s redemptive moments &#171; NewsReal Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=2680#comment-3578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] talk show host Bill Maher all the time for all sorts of reasons. (Most recent examples include his tolerance of anti-white racism and his tendency to frequently stage debates that range in ideology from the hard, Nation Left to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] talk show host Bill Maher all the time for all sorts of reasons. (Most recent examples include his tolerance of anti-white racism and his tendency to frequently stage debates that range in ideology from the hard, Nation Left to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Swindle</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/18/hbo-just-because-you-have-an-excuse-to-be-racist-doesnt-mean-well-tolerate-your-racism/#comment-3577</link>
		<dc:creator>David Swindle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=2680#comment-3577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well hold on just a moment, Jill. Not to defend Maher but I think I know what he&#039;s talking about. Both Barry Goldwater and William F. Buckley, Jr. opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. (Regardless, though, the bill passed the house with most Republicans supporting it.) This was a case in which two Conservative Movement standardbearers were on the wrong side of history. I know Buckley later admitted his error here, not sure if Goldwater did. Probably. Regardless, Goldwater&#039;s opposition came  from his libertarianism -- it was a painful, principled stand -- not any sort of racist sentiment.

Regardless, you&#039;re right that the Democratic Party has plenty of racial skeletons in its closet. However I really wouldn&#039;t say either party has more racists than the other or a more odious history of racism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well hold on just a moment, Jill. Not to defend Maher but I think I know what he&#8217;s talking about. Both Barry Goldwater and William F. Buckley, Jr. opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. (Regardless, though, the bill passed the house with most Republicans supporting it.) This was a case in which two Conservative Movement standardbearers were on the wrong side of history. I know Buckley later admitted his error here, not sure if Goldwater did. Probably. Regardless, Goldwater&#8217;s opposition came  from his libertarianism &#8212; it was a painful, principled stand &#8212; not any sort of racist sentiment.</p>
<p>Regardless, you&#8217;re right that the Democratic Party has plenty of racial skeletons in its closet. However I really wouldn&#8217;t say either party has more racists than the other or a more odious history of racism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/18/hbo-just-because-you-have-an-excuse-to-be-racist-doesnt-mean-well-tolerate-your-racism/#comment-3576</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=2680#comment-3576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes the guilt! the guilt!

tell me which race was it that freed the slaves?
in the US?
in Europe?
in Africa?

and why exactly do we owe them?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes the guilt! the guilt!</p>
<p>tell me which race was it that freed the slaves?<br />
in the US?<br />
in Europe?<br />
in Africa?</p>
<p>and why exactly do we owe them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/18/hbo-just-because-you-have-an-excuse-to-be-racist-doesnt-mean-well-tolerate-your-racism/#comment-3575</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 08:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrealblog.com/?p=2680#comment-3575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wrong side of history on the Civil Rights Movement? The Civil Rights Movement was a Republican Movement. The Democratic Party was the opposition ever since Democrats were kicked out of Congress for twelve years after the Civil War for trying to pass national Jim Crow laws. Talk about white washing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong side of history on the Civil Rights Movement? The Civil Rights Movement was a Republican Movement. The Democratic Party was the opposition ever since Democrats were kicked out of Congress for twelve years after the Civil War for trying to pass national Jim Crow laws. Talk about white washing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
