Comments on: Fox News: Sotomayor Opposes Gun Rights http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/14/fox-sotomayor-opposes-gun-rights/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:10:03 +0000 hourly 1 By: marlene http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/14/fox-sotomayor-opposes-gun-rights/#comment-3491 marlene Sun, 04 Oct 2009 16:59:39 +0000 http://newsrealblog.com/?p=2433#comment-3491 Who cares what Sotomayor opposes? She's supposed to uphold the Constitution - period. If she doesn't and puts in her own personal two cents, throw her off the bench. I'm tired of the press enlightening us on what these for-life (ugh!) judges "feel" about American issues. It's about time we heard about what the Constitution "says" about American issues. Obviously, the average American can't think for him/herself - look who they voted for! So enlighten them; educate them; inspire them, and by the way, report some important news for a change AND stop milking yesterday's news. Of course, I'm not complaining about this great site. I'm complaining about the supremeless court judges, the media, etc. Do you agree? Who cares what Sotomayor opposes? She’s supposed to uphold the Constitution – period. If she doesn’t and puts in her own personal two cents, throw her off the bench. I’m tired of the press enlightening us on what these for-life (ugh!) judges “feel” about American issues. It’s about time we heard about what the Constitution “says” about American issues. Obviously, the average American can’t think for him/herself – look who they voted for! So enlighten them; educate them; inspire them, and by the way, report some important news for a change AND stop milking yesterday’s news. Of course, I’m not complaining about this great site. I’m complaining about the supremeless court judges, the media, etc. Do you agree?

]]> By: Linda Rivera http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/14/fox-sotomayor-opposes-gun-rights/#comment-3490 Linda Rivera Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:21:47 +0000 http://newsrealblog.com/?p=2433#comment-3490 It is a hostile act against America that ANTI-CONSTITUTION Sotomayor is nominated for the Supreme Court. Sotomayor's known radical leftist political beliefs threaten the rights and safety of ALL Americans. Unlike Sotomayor and Acorn's Maria Polanco, the overwhelming majority of Latinos cherish freedom. Cherish the rights the Constitution gives to ALL Americans. MAY WE NEVER LOSE OUR FREEDOM! It is a hostile act against America that ANTI-CONSTITUTION Sotomayor is nominated for the Supreme Court. Sotomayor’s known radical leftist political beliefs threaten the rights and safety of ALL Americans.

Unlike Sotomayor and Acorn’s Maria Polanco, the overwhelming majority of Latinos cherish freedom. Cherish the rights the Constitution gives to ALL Americans. MAY WE NEVER LOSE OUR FREEDOM!

]]> By: Roy Pitta http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/14/fox-sotomayor-opposes-gun-rights/#comment-3489 Roy Pitta Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:44:04 +0000 http://newsrealblog.com/?p=2433#comment-3489 Though I am an independent and I'm not a fan of either political party, I am a big supporter of the 2nd Amendment. It was not only to be able to defend ourselves against our homes, but to defend ourselves against our government should it get out of control. I do not like this aspect of our current administration nor of our new Supreme court Nominee, though I do think that she does gartner some merit and has made good decisions in other areas, this is an area that I do not agree with when it comes to her. States rights are to come out of the scope of the Constitution. The Constitution supercedes everything else, and that worries me that she does not acknowledge that fact. As a lawyer and a judge she should understand that completely, so from my perspective she is choosing to ignore this fact and in my eyes this makes her a major liability as she is not to be put on the court to express her own personal beliefs, but to enforce the constitution whether or not she agrees with it. Though I am an independent and I’m not a fan of either political party, I am a big supporter of the 2nd Amendment. It was not only to be able to defend ourselves against our homes, but to defend ourselves against our government should it get out of control. I do not like this aspect of our current administration nor of our new Supreme court Nominee, though I do think that she does gartner some merit and has made good decisions in other areas, this is an area that I do not agree with when it comes to her. States rights are to come out of the scope of the Constitution. The Constitution supercedes everything else, and that worries me that she does not acknowledge that fact. As a lawyer and a judge she should understand that completely, so from my perspective she is choosing to ignore this fact and in my eyes this makes her a major liability as she is not to be put on the court to express her own personal beliefs, but to enforce the constitution whether or not she agrees with it.

]]> By: Matthew Vadum http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/14/fox-sotomayor-opposes-gun-rights/#comment-3488 Matthew Vadum Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:24:55 +0000 http://newsrealblog.com/?p=2433#comment-3488 You're right, Alabama Roadrunner. If the Doctrine of Incorporation (14th Amendment) applies to the states with respect to the other rights in the Bill of Rights why wouldn't it apply to the Second Amendment? You’re right, Alabama Roadrunner. If the Doctrine of Incorporation (14th Amendment) applies to the states with respect to the other rights in the Bill of Rights why wouldn’t it apply to the Second Amendment?

]]> By: Alabama Roadrunner http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/14/fox-sotomayor-opposes-gun-rights/#comment-3487 Alabama Roadrunner Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:54:17 +0000 http://newsrealblog.com/?p=2433#comment-3487 Too bad she has no logic to her. If the Second Amendment does not apply to the states, then none of the others amendments do either. Therefore, states could control all media within their borders, people could be forced to testify against themselves, and all the federal government would have to do is turn terror suspects over to the states, as the states would not have to guarantee a speedy trial. May some people in the Senate wake up! Too bad she has no logic to her. If the Second Amendment does not apply to the states, then none of the others amendments do either. Therefore, states could control all media within their borders, people could be forced to testify against themselves, and all the federal government would have to do is turn terror suspects over to the states, as the states would not have to guarantee a speedy trial. May some people in the Senate wake up!

]]> By: James E. McMullen, III http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/14/fox-sotomayor-opposes-gun-rights/#comment-3486 James E. McMullen, III Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:05:28 +0000 http://newsrealblog.com/?p=2433#comment-3486 In the words of Charlton Heston: "...from my cold dead hands." And I am on record in an interview with our local television station with my opposition to anyone who would step on the Second Amendment. In the words of Charlton Heston: “…from my cold dead hands.” And I am on record in an interview with our local television station with my opposition to anyone who would step on the Second Amendment.

]]> By: dka http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/14/fox-sotomayor-opposes-gun-rights/#comment-3485 dka Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:32:26 +0000 http://newsrealblog.com/?p=2433#comment-3485 Sotomayor is covered with a thin veneer trying to 'get by'. The constitution means nothing to her! She wants to get in, then she will do the work for Acorn and other political groups who want to take America down. Just another czarina that Obama just could not get in through the back door. She does not deserve to be on the high court! Sotomayor is covered with a thin veneer trying to ‘get by’. The constitution means nothing to her! She wants to get in, then she will do the work for Acorn and other political groups who want to take America down.
Just another czarina that Obama just could not get in through the back door.
She does not deserve to be on the high court!

]]> By: Glen Schorzman http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/14/fox-sotomayor-opposes-gun-rights/#comment-3484 Glen Schorzman Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:55:22 +0000 http://newsrealblog.com/?p=2433#comment-3484 One wonders what other provisions of the constitution Judge Sotomayor would make optional? One wonders what other provisions of the constitution Judge Sotomayor would make optional?

]]> By: Barry Loberfeld http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/07/14/fox-sotomayor-opposes-gun-rights/#comment-3483 Barry Loberfeld Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:35:46 +0000 http://newsrealblog.com/?p=2433#comment-3483 <a href="http://abcdunlimited.com/ideas/arms.html" rel="nofollow">How to defend the 2nd Amendment.</a> How to defend the 2nd Amendment.

]]>